Click here to download

Architectural features and social changes in gentrifying Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin
Journal Title: TERRITORIO 
Author/s: Federica Amoruso 
Year:  2015 Issue: 73 Language: English 
Pages:  9 Pg. 14-22 FullText PDF:  276 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TR2015-073003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Il dibattito accademico sulla gentrification si è principalmente interessato degli aspetti socioeconomici del fenomeno. Ma come si trasforma lo spazio e l’estetica del quartiere all’arrivo di un nuovo gruppo sociale? Il contributo di questo testo è quello di analizzare i cambiamenti sociali in relazione alle trasformazioni del costruito nel quartiere e di dimostrare che l’omogeneità dei gentrifiers si riflette sugli aspetti architettonici ed estetici, causando omogeneità spaziale ed estetica. Questa lettura del processo di gentrification viene applicata sul quartiere di Prenzlauer Berg, a Berlino, e intende approfondire il fenomeno di displacement dei gruppi squatters dovuto al processo di gentrification
Keywords: Gentrification; architettura; Berlino

  1. Abel C., 1997, Architecture and Identity, Architectural Press, Oxford.
  2. Atkinson R., 1986, «The Hidden Costs of Gentrification: Displacement in Central London», in Smith N., Williams P. (eds.), Gentrification in the City, Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 178 -200.
  3. Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass.
  4. Bernt M., 2012, «The ‘Double Movements’ of Neighbourhood Change: Gentrification and Public Policy in
  5. Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg», Urban Studies, vol. 49, n. 14, pp. 3045-3062., DOI: 10.1177/0042098012437746
  6. Bernt M., Holm A., 2005, «Exploring the Substance and Style of Gentrification », in Atkinson R., Bridge G. (eds.), Gentrification in a Global Context. The new urban colonialism, Routledge, London, pp. 106-120.
  7. Bent M., Holm A., 2005, «Gentrification of a Particular Type. The Case of Prenzlauer Berg», in Atkinson R., Bridge G. (eds.), Gentrification in a Global Perspective, Blackwell, London, pp. 106-125.
  8. Bent M., Holm A., 2009, «Is it or is it not? The Conceptualisation of Gentrification and Displacement and its Political Implications in the Case of Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg», City Special Issue, vol. 13, n. 2-3, pp. 312-324., DOI: 10.1080/13604810902982268
  9. Bridge G., 2001, «Estate Agents as Interpreters of Economic and Cultural Capital: The Gentrification Premium in Sydney House Market», International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 25, n. 1, pp. 87-101., DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00299
  10. Connolly K., 2012, «Berlin’s Oldest Squatters in Town Defend Threatened Community Centre», The Guardian (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  11. Drissel D., 2011, «Anarchist Punks Resisting Gentrification: Countercultural Contestations of Space in the New Berlin», The International Journal of the Humanities, vol. 8, n. 10, pp. 19-44.
  12. Emms S., 2009, «Two Decades of Clubbing in Berlin, City of the Night», The Guardian (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  13. Foucault M., 1984, Space, Knowledge and Power, Pantheon, New York.
  14. Glass R., 1964, London: Aspects of Change, Centre for Urban Studies, London.
  15. Hensher P., 2013, «Bohemia has Fallen to the Bankers», The Independent (; accessed 22/2/2015).
  16. Holm A., 2006, «Urban Renewal and the End of Social Housing: The Roll Out of Neoliberalism in East Berlin’s Prenzlauer Berg: Urban Renewal, Urban Policy and Modes of Regulation», Social Justice, vol. 33, n. 3, pp. 114-132.
  17. Holm A., Kuhn A., 2010, «Squatting and Urban Renewal: The Interaction of Squatter Movements and Strategies of Urban Restructuring in Berlin », International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 33, n. 3, pp. 644-658., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.001009.x
  18. Huron A.M., 2002, Gentrification and Individualization: The Case of Fehrbelliner Strasse 6, Unpublished Master thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  19. Jager M., 1986, «Class Definition and the Esthetics of Gentrification: Victoriana in Melbourne», Gentrification of the City, vol. 9, n. 2, pp. 223- 232.
  20. Japha D.V., 1991, «Identity Through Detail: Architectural and Cultural Aspiration in Montagu, South Africa, 1850-1915», Tdsr, vol. 2, n. 1, pp. 7-33.
  21. Katz S., Mayer M., 1985, «Gimme Shelter: Self-help Housing Struggles within and Against the State», International Journal of urban and Regional Research , vol. 9, n. 1, pp. 15-47., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1985.tb00419.x
  22. Lees L., 2008, «Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?», Urban Studies , vol. 45, n. 12, pp. 2449-2470., DOI: 10.1177/0042098008097099
  23. Levine M.A., 2004, «Government Policy, the Local State and Gentrification: The Case of Prenzlauer Berg (Berlin), Germany», Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 89-108., DOI: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.007.x
  24. Lynch K., 1964, L’immagine della città, Marsilio, Venezia.
  25. Mayer M., 2003, «The ‘Career’ of Urban Social Movements in German Cities», in Fisher R., Kling J. (eds.), Mobilizing the Community: Local Politics in a Global Era, Sage, Newbury Park.
  26. Marcuse P., 1986, «Abandonment, Gentrification and Displacement: The Linkages in New York City», in Smith N., Williams P. (eds.), Gentrification of the City, Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 153-177.
  27. Massey D., 1994, Space, Place and Gender, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
  28. Massey D., 2005, For Space, Sage Publications, London.
  29. Mc Kay G., 1998, DiY Culture. Party & Protest in Nineties Britain, Verso, London.
  30. Niessen B.M., 2009, Going Commercial. L’integrazione degli artisti underground a Milano e Berlino, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Milano-Bicocca.
  31. Norberg-Shulz C., 1979, Genius Loci: paesaggio, ambiente, architettura, Electa, Milan.
  32. Pidd H., 2011, «Berlin Police Mount Huge Operation to Evict Tenants of Former Squat», The Guardian (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  33. Smith N., 1979, «Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, Not People», Journal of American Planning Association, vol. 45, n. 4, pp.538-48., DOI: 10.1080/01944367908977002
  34. Pruijt H., 2004, «Okupar en Europa», in Lopez M.M., Adell R., (eds), ¿Dónde están las llaves? El movimiento okupa: prácticas y contextos sociales (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  35. Urban F., 2007, «Designing the Past in East Berlin Before and After the German Reunification», Progress in Planning, vol. 68, n. 1, pp. 1-55.
  36. Van Heerden S., Bontje M., 2013, «What About Culture for the Ordinary Workforce? A Study of the Locational Preferences of the Creative Class in Prenzluaer Berg, Berlin», Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 36, n. 3, pp. 465-481., DOI: 10.1111/juaf.12048
  37. Van Heur B., 2009, «The Clustering of Creative Networks: Between Myth and Reality», Urban Studies, vol. 46, n. 8, pp. 1531- 1152., DOI: 10.1177/004209800910550
  38. Wates N., 1980, Squatting, The Real Story, Bay Leaf Books, London

Federica Amoruso, in "TERRITORIO" 73/2015, pp. 14-22, DOI:10.3280/TR2015-073003


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content