Click here to download

Journal Title: CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA) 
Author/s: Ermanno Calzolaio 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  20 Pg. 103-122 FullText PDF:  72 KB
DOI:  10.3280/CEU2015-001004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The following essay deals with Protocol no° 16 to the ECHR, which enables highest courts and tribunals of the Contracting Parties to request the Court to give advisory opinions on questions of principle relating to the interpretation or application of the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention or the protocols. Despite the fact that advisory opinions shall not be binding (art. 5), this new instrument could strengthen the role of the Court in the shaping of a system of protection of human rights which is essentially case law based, in view of a more intense dialogue between national judges and the Court. In this perspective, the Author makes also some critical remarks about the recent decision of the EU Court of Justice according to which the project of adhesion of the EU to the ECHR is contrary to the Union Law.

Ermanno Calzolaio, in "CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA)" 1/2015, pp. 103-122, DOI:10.3280/CEU2015-001004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content