Clicca qui per scaricare

L’evoluzione dei Participatory Guarantee Systems per l’agricoltura biologica: esperienze mondiali a confronto
Titolo Rivista: ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE 
Autori/Curatori: Giovanna Sacchi 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2015 Fascicolo: 2  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  16 P. 77-92 Dimensione file:  137 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ECAG2015-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


This paper highlights the importance and the emergence of Participatory Guarantee Systems (pgs) for quality assurance of organic products worldwide. The study provides an overview of several experiences of networks that have adopted pgs. As such, the paper represents a valuable instrument considering the different facets that these models have assumed over the years, in different countries and contexts, in response to different needs. The first network described is the Brazilian Rede Ecovida de Agroecologia. It is interesting to note that in this case the work and the products of the network are officially recognized within the national legislation. On the contrary, Certified Naturally Grown was founded from the need of diversification from the American National Organic Program. Finally, the Indian ngo Keystone Foundation, which promotes and stands for the protection of both cultivation and indigenous cultures. In Italy the CampiAperti association represents one of the best-organized network of producers and co-producers based on pgs principles. The Italian experience offers the chance to a widespread remark, also by Genuino Clandestino movement, on the need for policy adjustments to the variety of productive practices as well as looking at the several experiences of small processors. In this respect in Italy policymakers are starting to discuss a number of measures aimed at protecting family farmers and their production habits. For example, Regulation n. 19/2014 of Emilia Romagna Region recognizes and defends the application of solidarity economic activities. This regulation enhances the importance of peasant agriculture and its practices and it also recognizes the participatory guarantee as a model that ensures environmental and social sustainability and animal welfare as well as workers’ rights. Specific interest in this topic has also come up on the European agenda. In 2013 the EU launched an online public consultation on organic agriculture and the regulation of organic production. This survey contains some questions regarding EU citizens’ willingness to accept alternative certification schemes. Furthermore, in 2014 Horizon2020 published a call entitled Small farms but global markets: the role of small and family farms in food and nutrition security. This call recognizes the importance of the contribution of family farms, and in particular smallholder farms, to food and nutrition security. This is why, we have to encourage and develop the growing also at EU policy level for alternative safeguarding models for organic agriculture.


Keywords: Alternative food networks, alternative labelling systems for organic, participatory guarantee systems, organic regulation
Jel Code: O13, Q13, Q18

  1. aiab – Associazione Italiana per l’Agricoltura Biologica, Coldiretti &Legambiente (2011). I valori del Biologico: Sociali, Economici e Ambientali, Dossier, Roma.
  2. Chiorri, M., Paffarini, C. & Galioto, F. (2013). Orticoltura biologica e filiera corta: alcuni casi di studio. Agriregionieuropa, anno 9, n. 32, p. 40
  3. Council Regulation (EC) No 852/2004.
  4. LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:139:0001:0054:en:PDF.
  5. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.
  6. LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:189:0001:0023:EN:PDF.
  7. Courville, S. (2006). Organic standards and certification. In Kristiansen P., Taji A.,
  8. Renagold J. (Eds.), Organic Agriculture. A global perspective. New York: csiro publishing, pp. 201-219.
  9. Decreto n. 6.323, del 27 dicembre 2007. Presidenza della Repubblica, Brasilia, Brasile.
  10. Decreto n. 6.913, del 23 luglio 2009. Presidenza della Repubblica, Brasilia, Brasile. Decreto del Presidente della Provincia di Bolzano, 2 aprile 2012, n. 10 Pubblicato nel B.U. 17 aprile 2012, n. 16, art. 4, Requisiti dei locali e del materiale ai fini della lavorazione dei prodotti alimentari.
  11. Eernstman, N. & Wals, A.E.J. (2009). Jhum meets ifoam: introducing organic agriculture in a tribal society. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7(2), 95-106., DOI: 10.3763/ijas.2009.0398
  12. Fonseca, M.F., Wilkinson, J., Egelyng, H. & Mascarenhas, G. (2008). The institutionalization of Participatory Guarantee Systems (pgs) in Brazil: organic and fair trade initiatives In: 16th ifoam Organic World Congress, Modena, Italy, June 16-20, 2008. 5 pp.
  13. Franco, S. & Marino, D. (Eds.) (2012). Il mercato della Filiera corta. I farmers’ market come luogo di incontro di produttori e consumatori. Working paper n. 19, Gruppo 2012.
  14. Harris, P.J.C., Browne, A.W., Barrett, H.R. & Cadoret, K. (2001). Facilitating the Inclusion of the Resource-Poor in Organic Production and Trade: Opportunities and Constraints Posed by Certification. Rural Livelihoods Department, Department for International Development, London.
  15. ifoam (2003). Small holder group certification for organic production and processing, Technical report.
  16. ifoam (2007). Participatory Guarantee Systems. Shared Vision, Shared Ideals. Technical report. Bonn
  17. Legge n. 10.831, del 23 dicembre 2003. Presidenza della Repubblica, Brasilia, Brasile.
  18. May, C. (2008). pgs Guidelines, How Participatory Guarantee Systems Can Develop and Function. Bonn: IFOAM.
  19. Meirelles, L. (2003). La Certificación de Productos Orgánicos – Encuentros y Desencuentros. Brazil: Centro Ecologico Ipe.
  20. Nelson, E., Tovar, L.G., Rindermann, R.S. & Cruz, M.A.G. (2010). Participatory organic certification in Mexico: an alternative approach to maintaining thehing. integrity of the organic label. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(2), 227-237., DOI: 10.1007/s10460-009-9205-x
  21. Radomsky, G.F.W. (2009). Praticas de certificacao participativa na agricultura ecologica: rede, selos e processos de inovacao. IDeAS, 3(1), 133-164.
  22. Raynolds, L.T. (2000). Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(3), 297-309., DOI: 10.1023/A:1007608805843
  23. Rede Ecovida (2007). Uma identidade que se constrói em rede. Caderno de Formacao 01, Lapa, Parana, Brazil.
  24. Renting H., Marsden T.K. & Banks J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A, 35(3), 393-411., DOI: 10.1068/a3510
  25. Sacchi, G., Zanasi, C. & Canavari, M. (2011). Modelli alternativi di garanzia della qualita dei prodotti biologici alla luce della Teoria delle Convenzioni. Rivista di Economia Agro-Alimentare, 13(3), 57-80., DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2011-003005
  26. Vogl, C.R., Kilcher, L. & Schmidt, H. (2005). Are Standards and Regulations of Organic Farming Moving Away from Small Farmers’ Knowledge? Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 26(1), 5-26., DOI: 10.1300/J064v26n01_03
  27. Whatmore, S., Stassart, P. & Renting, H. (2003). What’s alternative about alternative food networks? Environment and Planning A, 35(3), 389-391., DOI: 10.1068/a3621
  28. Zanasi, C., Venturi, P., Setti, M. & Rota, C. (2009). Participative organic certification, trust and local rural communities development: the Case of Rede Ecovida. New Medit, 8(2), 56-64.



  1. Giovanna Sacchi, Social innovation matters: The adoption of participatory guarantee systems within Italian alternative agri‐food networks in Strategic Change /2019 pp. 241, DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2265

Giovanna Sacchi, in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2015, pp. 77-92, DOI:10.3280/ECAG2015-002005

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche