Click here to download

The effects of the Ecobonus incentive in the transport sector: an evaluation
Journal Title: RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO 
Author/s: Marica D'Elia, Guido Pellegrini, Agostina Zanoli 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  21 Pg. 56-76 FullText PDF:  127 KB
DOI:  10.3280/REST2015-003003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Objectives. The ex-post evaluation is a fundamental step to provide the policy makers with useful information about the implementation of past program. The present study focuses on the use of a method of evaluating causal effects produced by the Ecobonus incentive. It was granted to promote intermodal transport between road and sea.
Methods and Resultats
The evaluation method used is based on a counterfactual approach that compares the results generated with the introduction of the incentive scheme with the hypothetical results that would be obtained in the absence of it. It is the first time that the effects of this program are evaluated using a counterfactual framework. The performed analysis evaluates the validity of the incentive in terms of achieved modal transfer. The estimated average net effect was positive and equal to 58 percent of total traffic in the year 2011 on selected routes.
Conclusions
The final conclusion is that Ecobonus has promoted the use of sea routes favoring savings in terms of lower environmental costs.
Keywords: Ecobonus incentive, difference in differences, policy evaluation, intermodal transport, counterfactual analysis, motorways of the sea
Jel Code: R42.

  1. Benevolo F. (2013), The Italian Ecobonus – Concluding findings, documentazione del convegno “Joint Short Sea Shipping and Motorways of the Sea, Focal points and short sea promotion centres meeting”, Brussels.
  2. CETENA, COFIR (2002), Le autostrade del mare. Programma straordinario per lo sviluppo del cabotaggio marittimo e fluviale, Confitarma, Fincantieri. Roma: Fedarlinea.
  3. CIELI (2011), Analisi strutturale del trasporto combinato marittimo e proposte di potenziamento, contributo per la definizione del Piano nazionale della logistica, Università degli studi di Genova.
  4. Commissione delle Comunità Europee (2001), Libro Bianco “La politica europea dei trasporti fino al 2010: il momento delle scelte”, COM(2001) 370, Bruxelles, 12/9/2001.
  5. Commissione delle Comunità Europee (2011), Libro Bianco “Tabelle di marcia verso uno spazio unico Europeo dei trasporti. Per una politica dei trasporti competitiva e sostenibile”, COM(2011) 144, Bruxelles, 28/3/2011.
  6. Commissione delle Comunità Europee (2013), Marco Polo programme – Results and outlook, COM(2013) 278, Bruxelles, 14/5/2013.
  7. Confitarma – Confederazione Italiana Armatori (2006), Relazione del Consiglio per l’anno 2005, Roma.
  8. D’Elia M. (2015), Incentivi e intermodalità: una valutazione degli effetti dell’Ecobonus, tesi di laurea anno accademico 2013-2014, Facoltà di Scienze politiche, sociologia e comunicazione, Università La Sapienza di Roma.
  9. Europe Economics (2011), Evaluation of the Marco Polo Programme 2003-2010, Final Report, London.
  10. FORMEZ (2006), Valutare gli effetti delle politiche pubbliche – Metodi e applicazioni al caso italiano. Roma: Ufficio Stampa ed Editoria.
  11. Heckman J.J., Robb R. (1985), Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions, Journal of Econometrics, 30, pp. 239-267.
  12. Holland P.W. (1986), Statistics and Causal Inference, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 396, pp. 945-960.
  13. Imbens G., Wooldridge J. (2007), Difference-in-Differences Estimation, NBER. ISFORT (2014), Autostrade del mare 2.0 – Risultati, criticità, proposte per il rilancio, http://www.isfort.it/sito/osslog/documenti/179.pdf.
  14. ISTAT (2014), Annuario statistico italiano 2014. Roma: ISTAT.
  15. Istituto idrografico della Marina (2004), Tavola delle distanze.
  16. Italpress (2014), Trapani: Fit Cisl “porto in crisi, subito tavolo per suo rilancio”.
  17. Lombard P.L., Malocchi A. (2001), Navigazione e ambiente. Un confronto con i costi esterni delle altre modalità di trasporto. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  18. Meyer B.D. (1995), Natural and Quasi-Experiments in Economics, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13, 2, pp. 151-161.
  19. Moffit R. (1991), Program Evaluation with non Experimental Data, Evaluation Review, 15, 3, pp. 291-314.
  20. Mora R., Reggio I. (2012), Treatment Effect Identification using Alternative Parallel Assumption, Working Paper 12-33, Economic Series (48).
  21. Papke L. (1994), Tax Policy and Urban Development. Evidence from the Indiana Enterprise Zone Program, Journal of Public Economics, 54, pp. 37-49.

Marica D'Elia, Guido Pellegrini, Agostina Zanoli, The effects of the Ecobonus incentive in the transport sector: an evaluation in "RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO" 3/2015, pp. 56-76, DOI:10.3280/REST2015-003003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content