Click here to download

Mentally disordered offenders in Italy: social dangerousness and assessment of risk factors. Historical approach and current features
Journal Title: RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA 
Author/s: Laura Castelletti, Ettore Straticò 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  18 Pg. 133-150 FullText PDF:  1679 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RSF2016-001009
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The definitive closure of the six forensic psychiatric hospitals brought the scientific community, in Italy, to re-examine the existing organizational models and practices for mentally disordered offenders. The decades of isolation of forensic psychiatry, from other mental health services, explains why both the practices and evaluation systems of this field of psychiatry now need updating. The author - taking into account the historical reasons for the lingering cultural development of forensic psychiatry in Italy, compared to other European countries - examines the scientific, legislative and political factors that determined the promulgation of the Law 09/2012 and discusses the contents of the following Law 81/2014 on the risks and outcomes for mentally disordered offenders in forensic psychiatric rehabilitation. The author concludes that forensic psychiatric practices in Italy still follow principles of discretion and subjectivity and not evidence-based criteria.
Keywords: Forensic psychiatry, social dangerousness, violence risk assessment, needs assessment

  1. [1] Legge 17 febbraio 2012, n. 9. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 42 del 20/02/2012. http://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2012/02/20/012G0026/sg
  2. [2] Legge 30 maggio 2014, n. 81. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 125 del 31/05/2014. http://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2014/5/31/14G00093/sg
  3. [3] Lombroso C. L’uomo delinquente, in rapporto all’antropologia, alla giurisprudenza ed alla psichiatria (Torino: Fratelli Bocca; 1897). Milano: Bompiani; 2006.
  4. [4] Ferri E. L’imputabilità e la negazione del libero arbitrio. Bologna: Zanichelli 1881.
  5. [5] Pelissero M. Il doppio binario nel sistema penale italiano. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo 2011.
  6. [6] Legge 26 luglio 1975, n. 354. Norme sull’ordinamento penitenziario e sulla esecuzione delle misure privative e limitative della libertà (GU n.212 del 9-8-1975 - Suppl. Ordinario ).
  7. [7] De Vito CG. Forensic psychiatric units in Italy from the 1960s to the present. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2014; 37: 127-134.
  8. [8] Andreoli V. Anatomia degli Ospedali Psichiatrici Giudiziari Italiani, Dipartimento Amministrazione Penitenziaria. Roma: Ufficio Studi e Ricerche; 2002.
  9. [9] Harty MA, Tighe J, Leese M, Thornicroft G. Inverse care for mentally ill prisoners: unmet needs in forensic mental health services. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2003; 14: 600-614.
  10. [10] DPCM del 1/4/2008 Allegato C. Linee di indirizzo per gli interventi negli ospedali psichiatrici giudiziari (OPG) e nelle case di cura e custodia. [11] Collica MT. La crisi del concetto di autore non imputabile “pericoloso”. Diritto Penale Contemporaneo 2012.
  11. [12] Mangione A. La misura di prevenzione fra dogmatica e politica criminale. Padova: Cedam; 2001.
  12. [13] Fornari U. Lettura Magistrale: “La responsabilità professionale degli operatori psichiatrici nella gestione del rischio del comportamento violento”. Bergamo: VII Congresso Nazionale Coordinamento Spdc, “Il futuro degli SPDC tra continuità e innovazione”, 8 novembre 2014.
  13. [14] Catanesi R. Superare l’equivoco. Comunicato Stampa. Soc. It. Psichiatria, 2014. http://www.ispcapp.org/docs/OspedaliPG/Societa_Psichiatria.swf
  14. [15] Dowsett J. Measurement of risk by a community forensic mental health team. Psychiatric Bulletin 2005; 29: 9-12.
  15. [16] Khiroya R, Weaver T, Maden T. Use and perceived utility of structured violence risk assessments in English medium secure forensic units. Psychiatric Bulletin 2009; 33: 129-132.
  16. [17] Mossman D. Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994; 62: 783-792.
  17. [18] Steadman H, Cocozza J. Careers of Criminally Insane. Lexington Mass: Lexington books; 1974.
  18. [19] Douglas K. Version 3 of the Historical-Clinical-Risk management-20 (HCR-20): relevance to violence risk assessment and management in forensic conditional release contexts. Behavioral Sciences and Law 2014; 32: 557-576.
  19. [20] Swanson JW, Holzer CE, Ganju VK. Violence and psychiatric disorder in the community: evidence from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area surveys. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41: 761-770.
  20. [21] Fazel S, Langstrom N, Hjern A, Grann M, Lichtenstein P. Schizophrenia, substance abuse and violent crime. JAMA 2009; 301 (19): 2016-2023.
  21. [22] Hodgins S, Cree A, Khalid K, Sainz-Fuentes R, Shortt M, Mak T, et al. Do community mental health teams caring for severely mentally ill patients adjust treatments and services based on patients’ antisocial or criminal behaviours? European Psychiatry 2009; 24: 373-379.
  22. [23] Douglas K, Guy LS, Hart SD. Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2009; 135: 679-706.
  23. [24] Allnutt S, Ogloff J, Adams J, O’Driscoll C, Daffern M, Carroll A, Nanayakkara V, Chaplow D. Managing aggression and violence: the clinician’s role in contemporary mental health care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2013; 47: 728-736.
  24. [25] Monahan J. The prediction of violent behaviour: toward a second generation of theory and policy. American Journal of Psychiatry 1984; 47: 511-521.
  25. [26] Yang M, Wong S, Coid J. The Efficacy of Violence Prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin 2010; 136: 740-767.
  26. [27] Singh JP, Grann M, Fazel S. A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25.980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review 2011; 31: 499-513.
  27. [28] Castelletti L, Rivellini G, Straticò E. Predictive validity of violence risk assessment tools, implications for forensic and general psychiatry in Italy. A literature review. Journal of Psychopatology 2014; 20:153-162.
  28. [29] Maden A. Treating violence, a guide to risk management in mental health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007, p. 109-112.
  29. [30] Bonta J. Offender risk assessment. Criminal Justice and Behaviour 2002; 29: 355-379.
  30. [31] Haque Q, Webster C. Structured professional judgement and sequential redirections. Criminal Behaviour Mental Health 2013; 23: 241-251.
  31. [32] Ullrich S, Keers R, Coid J. Delusions, anger, and serious violence: new findings from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2014; 40:1174-81.
  32. [33] Douglas K, Hart SD, Webster C, Belfrage H. HCR-20 V3: assessing risk for violence: user guide. Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University; 2013.
  33. [34] Dolores JC, Redding RE. The effects of different forms of risk communication on judicial decision making. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2009; 8:142-146.
  34. [35] Mossman D. Critique of Pure Risk Assessment or, Kant meets Tarasoff. University of Cincinnati Law Review 2006; 75: 523-609.
  35. [36] Nielssen O. Scientific and ethical problems with risk assessment in clinical practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2012; 47:1198-1199.
  36. [37] Straticò E. L’Empowerment e i Servizi di Salute Mentale. Roma: CIC Edizioni Internazionali; 2009.
  37. [38] Webster C, Martin M, Brink J, Nicholls T, Desmarais S. Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). Coquitlam: St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Forensic Service, BC Mental Health and Addiction Services, British Columbia, Canada; 2009.
  38. [39] Shinkfield G, Ogloff J. A review and analysis of routine outcome measures for forensic mental health services. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2014; 13: 252-271.
  39. [40] Castelletti L, Lasalvia A. La valutazione dei bisogni di cura nei pazienti psichiatrici autori di reato. Il ruolo della Camberwell Assessement of Need – Forensic Version (CANFOR). In: Rapporto Istisan. Roma: ISS; 2013

Laura Castelletti, Ettore Straticò, Mentally disordered offenders in Italy: social dangerousness and assessment of risk factors. Historical approach and current features in "RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA" 1/2016, pp. 133-150, DOI:10.3280/RSF2016-001009

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content