Click here to download

Il gioco d’azzardo sfida i Ser.T.: uno studio di caso
Journal Title: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Author/s: Alessia Bertolazzi 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 103-118 FullText PDF:  599 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2016-002008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The Italian case is emblematic of the liberalization of gambling and the drive towards its commercialization, taking place in several countries. Despite an uncertain political-legal framework, public services for addiction treatment are adapting to face the challenge posed by gambling. Therefore, a qualitative study was conducted within a sample of public services for addiction (Ser.T.) of an Italian region, involving professionals dedicated to gambling. The Author has attempted to identify the theoretical and practical approach adopted by organizations and professionals, through the comparison with the "chronic disease model" and "public health model".
Keywords: Gambling, pathological gambling, public agencies for dependencies treatment, medical model, chronic disease model, public health model.

  1. Aasved M.J. (2003). The Sociology of Gambling. Vol. 2, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III). Washington, D.C.: APA.
  3. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington, D.C.: APA.
  4. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V). Washington, D.C.: APA.
  5. Berkman L.F. (1995). The Role of Social Relations in Health Promotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57 (3): 245-254., DOI: 10.1097/00006842-199505000-0000
  6. Bertolazzi A. (2013). Il gioco d’azzardo tra alea e sicurezza. In Cipolla C., a cura di, La sicurezza come politica, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  7. Bertolazzi A. (2014). Il gioco d’azzardo online: rischi per una pratica sociale a vincoli deboli. In Cipolla C., a cura di, Le implicazioni criminologiche e vittimologiche del gioco d’azzardo, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Blaszczynski A., Ladouceur R., Shaffer H.J. (2004), A science-based framework for responsible gambling: the Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20 (3): 301-17., DOI: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e
  9. Castellani B. (2000). Pathological gambling. The making of a medical problem. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  10. Cisneros Örnberg J. (2006). Nordic gambling markets and the possibilities for state-level control. Journal of Gambling Issues, 18: 9-29., DOI: 10.4309/jgi.2006.18.
  11. Cisneros Örnberg J., Tammi T. (2011). Gambling problems as a political framing. Safeguarding the monopolies in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Gambling Issues, 26: 110-125., DOI: 10.4309/jgi.2011.26.
  12. Cosgrave J.F., a cura di (2006). The Sociology of Risk and Gambling Reader. London: Routledge.
  13. Dielman T.E. (1979). Gambling: a social problem? Journal of Social Issues, 35: 36-42.
  14. Ferentzy P., Skinner W. (2003). Gamblers Anonymous: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Gambling Issues, 9., DOI: 10.4309/jgi.2003.9.
  15. Ferentzy P., Turner N.E. (2012). Morals, medicine, metaphors, and the history of the disease model of problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 27: 1-27., DOI: 10.4309/jgi.2012.27.
  16. Furedi F. (2008). Il nuovo conformismo. Troppa psicologia nella vita quotidiana, Milano: Feltrinelli.
  17. Hodgins D.C., el-Guebaly N. (2000). Natural and treatment-assisted recovery from gambling problems: a comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction, 95 (5): 777-789., DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95577713.
  18. Kingma S.F. (2008). The liberalization and (re)regulation of Dutch gambling markets: National consequences of the changing European context. Regulation & Governance, 2: 445-458., DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00045.
  19. Kingma S.F., a cura di (2010). Global gambling: cultural perspectives on gambling organizations. London: Routledge.
  20. Korn D., Shaffer H. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15 (4), 289-365., DOI: 10.1023/A:102300511593
  21. Marcum J., Rowen H. (1974). How many games in town? The pros and cons of legalized gambling. Public Interest, 36: 26-52.
  22. McMillen J. (1996). Understanding Gambling. History, concepts and theory. In: McMillen J., a cura di, Gambling Cultures. London: Routledge.
  23. Pavarin R.M., Marani S., Turino E., Limonta N., Sanchini S., Colaninno M. (2012). Stima della prevalenza di soggetti con gioco d’azzardo patologico nell’area metropolitana di Bologna e analisi del sommerso. Italian Journal on Addiction, 2 (3-4): 98-102.
  24. Peele S. (2001). Is gambling an addiction like drug and alcohol addiction? Developing realistic and useful conceptions of compulsive gambling, Journal of Gambling Issues, 3., DOI: 10.4309/jgi.2001.3.
  25. Petry N.M., Stinson F.S. e Grant B.F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV Pathological Gambling and Other Psychiatric Disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66 (5): 564-574., DOI: 10.4088/JCP.v66n0504RoomR.(2005).Thewheeloffortune:Cyclesandreactionsingamblingpolicies
  26. Addiction, 100: 1226-1227., DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01201.xRosecranceJ.(1985).Compulsivegamblingandthemedicalizationofdeviance.SocialProblems,32:275-284.doi:10.1525/sp.1985.32.3.03a0009
  27. Rosecrance J. (1989). Controlled gambling: A promising future. In: H.J. Shaffer, S.A. Stein, B. Gambino, T.N. Cummings, Eds., Compulsive gambling, theory, research and practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  28. Shaffer H.J., LaPlante D.A (2005). Treatment of gambling disorders. In: Marlatt G.A., Donovan D.M., eds., Relapse prevention: maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
  29. Suissa A.J. (2006). Gambling Addiction as an Individual Pathology: A Commentary. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 4: 195-199.
  30. Sturlese V. (2005). I gruppi di auto-mutuo aiuto. In: Cipolla C., ed., Manuale di sociologia della salute. III. Spendibilità. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  31. van Teijlingen E. (2005). A critical analysis of the medical model as used in the study of pregnancy and childbirth. Sociological Research Online, 10 (2)., DOI: 10.5153/sro.103

Alessia Bertolazzi, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2016, pp. 103-118, DOI:10.3280/SES2016-002008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content