Click here to download

The capability approach as a critical yardstick for the employability paradigm
Author/s: Francesco Laruffa 
Year:  2016 Issue: 141 Language: English 
Pages:  15 Pg. 23-37 FullText PDF:  107 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2016-141002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The employability approach, which influenced the debate on social policy reform in Europe during the last two decades, focuses on the investment in human capital as a means to individual empowerment and to solve social problems such as unemployment, exclusion and inequality. It is argued that employability is both insufficient - in respect of its declared aims - and distorting because it suffers from a narrow economic vision of society. Employability is criticized using Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which is argued to provide a better framework to make the welfare state truly enabling. In particular, the paper discusses how the capability approach can broaden the anthropology at the basis of social policies beyond that of human capital characterizing employability, thus extending the basis of social citizenship beyond individuals’ productive capacity in the market.
Keywords: Employability, human capital, capability approach, social policy

  1. Allmendinger J. (2009). Der Sozialstaat des 21. Jahrhunderts braucht zwei Beine, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 45: 3-5. Available at accessed on the 10th February 2015.
  2. Beckfield J. (2012). Comment on Anton Hemerijck/3. More Europe, Not Less: Reversing the Long, Slow Decline of the European Social Model. Sociologica, 1: 1-5., DOI: 10.2383/36890
  3. Ben-Ishai E. (2012). The New Paternalism. An Analysis of Power, State Intervention and Autonomy. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1): 151-165., DOI: 10.1177/1065912910388183
  4. Bonvin J.-M., Farvaque N. (2004). Social and Individual Security, Opportunities and Responsibility: The Capability Approach and the Third Way, Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach, University of Pavia 5-7 September. Bonvin J.-M. (2012). Individual working lives and collective action. An introduction to capability for work and capability for voice. Transfer, 18(1): 9-18., DOI: 10.1177/1024258911431046
  5. Bothfeld S., Betzelt S. (2013). Can individual autonomy be an appropriate normative concept to cope with present challenges of the welfare state?, Paper presented at the Congrès francais de sociologie, Nantes, 4-5 September.
  6. Cantillon B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5): 432-449., DOI: 10.1177/0958928711418856
  7. Coffield F. (1999). Breaking the Consensus: lifelong learning as social control. British Educational Research Journal, 25(4): 479-499., DOI: 10.1080/0141192990250405
  8. Crocker D.A. (1992). Functioning and Capability: The Foundations of Sen’s and Nussbaum’s Development Ethic. Political Theory, 20(4): 584-612., DOI: 10.1177/0090591792020004003
  9. Dean H. (2003). Re-conceptualizing welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs. Journal of Social Policy, 32(3): 441-459., DOI: 10.1017/S0047279403007062
  10. Dean H., Bonvin J.-M., Vielle P., Farvaque N. (2005). Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. European Societies, 7(1): 3-26., DOI: 10.1080/1461669042000327009
  11. Ebert T. (2012). Soziale Gerechtigkeit in der Krise. Bonn: Bundeszentrale fur politische Bildung.
  12. Esping-Andersen G., ed. (1996). Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.
  13. Fleurbaey M. (2006). Capabilities, Functionings and Refined Functionings, Journal of Human Development, 7(3): 299-310., DOI: 10.1080/14649880600815875
  14. Franzini M. (2014). Il Welfare state e il futuro del benessere. Politiche Sociali, 2: 167-184.
  15. Giovanola B. (2009). Re-Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capabilities Enhancement. Journal of Business Ethics, 88: 431-444. DOI 10.1007/s10551-009-0126-9.
  16. Haahr J.H. (2004). Open co-ordination as advanced liberal government. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2): 209-230., DOI: 10.1080/1350176042000194403
  17. Hoggett P. (2000). Social Policy and the Emotions. In: Lewis G., Gewirtz S., Clarke J., eds., Rethinking Social Policy. London: The Open University Press.
  18. Jenson J., Saint-Martin D. (2003). New Routes to Social Cohesion? Citizenship and the Social Investment State. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1): 77-99.
  19. Joppke C. (2007). Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics, 30(1): 1-22., DOI: 10.1080/01402380601019613
  20. Lambert M., Vero J., Zimmermann B. (2012). Vocational training and professional development: a capability perspective. International Journal of Training and Development, 16(3): 164-182., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468
  21. 2419.2012.00402.x. Levitas R. (1996). The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy, 16: 5-20., DOI: 10.1177/026101839601604601
  22. Lewis J., Giullari S. (2005). The adult worker model family, gender equality and care: the search for new policy principles and the possibilities and problems of a capabilities approach. Economy and Society, 34(1): 76-104., DOI: 10.1080/0308514042000329342
  23. Lister R. (2003). Investing in the Citizens-Workers of the Future. Transformations in Citizenship and the State under New Labor. Social Policy & Administration, 37(5): 427-443., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9515.00350
  24. Meo A. (2012). I working poor. Una rassegna degli studi sociologici. La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 2: 219-241.
  25. Morel, N., Palier B., Palme J., eds. (2012). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  26. Nussbaum M. (2001). Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options. Economics and Philosophy, 17: 67-88., DOI: 10.1017/S0266267101000153
  27. Nussbaum M. (2008). Education for profit, education for freedom. Opening Plenary Address. Association of American Colleges and Universities,
  28. Washington, D.C. Available at accessed on the 10th February 2015.
  29. Orton M. (2011). Flourishing lives: the capabilities approach as a framework for new thinking about employment, work and welfare in the 21st century. Work Employment Society, 25(2): 352-360., DOI: 10.1177/0950017011403848
  30. Peck J., Theodore N. (2000). Beyond Employability. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24: 729-749., DOI: 10.1093/cje/24.6.729
  31. Perilleux T. (2005). Se rendre desirable. L’employabilite dans l’Etat social actif et l’ideologie manageriale. Document de travail de la Chaire Hoover, n. 147. Available at accessed on the 10th February 2015.
  32. Robeyns I. (2005). The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1): 93-114., DOI: 10.1080/146498805200034266
  33. Salais R. (2004). La politique des indicateurs. Du taux de chomage au taux d’emploi dans la Strategie europeenne pour l’emploi. In: Zimmermann B., ed., Les sciences sociales à l’éprouve de l’action. Le savant, le politique et l’Europe. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme, pp. 287-331.
  34. Salais R., Rogowski R., Whiteside N. (2011). Introduction. In: Rogowski R., Salais R., Whiteside N., eds., Transforming European Employment Policy: Labor Market, Transitions and the Promotion of Capability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1-22.
  35. Shakespeare T. (2000). The Social Relations of Care. In: Lewis G., Gewirtz S., Clarke J., eds., Rethinking Social Policy. London: The Open University Press.
  36. Sen A. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
  37. Sen A. (1999a). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Sen A. (1999b). L’Economie est une Science Morale. Paris: La Decouverte.
  39. Streeck W. (2011). The Crises of Democratic Capitalism. New Left Review, 71: 5-29. Available at accessed on the 10th February 2015. Taylor S. (2004). The Right Not to Work: Power and Disability. Monthly Review, 55(10): 30-44. Available at accessed on the 10th February 2015.
  40. Williams F. (2000). Principles of Recognition and Respect in Welfare. In: Lewis G., Gewirtz S., Clarke J., eds., Rethinking Social Policy. London: The Open University Press.
  41. Williams F. (2001). In and beyond New Labor: towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4): 467-493., DOI: 10.1177/026101830102100405
  42. Zimmermann B. (2006a). Changes in work and social protection: France, Germany and Europe. International Social Security Review, 59(4): 29-45., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2006.00252.x
  43. Zimmermann B. (2006b). Pragmatism and the Capability Approach. Challenges in Social Theory and Empirical Research. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(4): 467-484., DOI: 10.1177/1368431006073014
  44. Zimmermann B. (2011). Making employees’ pathways more secure: a critical examination of the company’s responsibility. In: Rogowski R., Salais R.,
  45. Whiteside N., eds., Transforming European Employment Policy: Labor Market, Transitions and the Promotion of Capability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 117-138.
  46. Zimmermann B. (2012). Collective responsibility in the workplace from a capability perspective. Transfer, 18(1): 19-30., DOI: 10.1177/1024258911431195

Francesco Laruffa, in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 141/2016, pp. 23-37, DOI:10.3280/SL2016-141002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content