Click here to download

The référentiel of employability policies: a cognitive approach
Author/s: Margherita Bussi 
Year:  2016 Issue: 141 Language: English 
Pages:  18 Pg. 89-106 FullText PDF:  222 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2016-141006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This paper provides an analytical tool for questioning the cognitive informational basis of employability policies. In times of high unemployment, the role of employability policies has gained in importance. To develop innovative employability measures, the informational basis of current approaches should be questioned and rethought. This article suggests both an analytical grid and a revised taxonomy of the dualistic approach to employability which consist of the "Work-First" and "Human Capital" approach. It does so by borrowing the notion of référentiel from public policy analysis and by adopting a Capability Approach perspective (CA). The analytical exercise is applied to the local Public Employment Services (PES) of the Brussels Capital Region (Belgium). The added value of this analytical approach is two-fold: it examines the cognitive bases of the concept of employability while providing an alternative taxonomy against which employability policies can be assessed and rethought.
Keywords: Référentiel, employability, capability approach, Belgium

  1. Actiris (2011). La procédure d’objectivation, Internal document.
  2. Alkire S. (2008). Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses. In: Comin F., Qizilbash M., Alkire S., eds., The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Anxo D., Erhel C. (2006). Irreversibility of time, reversibility of choices? The Life-Course foundations of the Transitional Labour Markets approach. Cahiers de la MES.
  4. Becker G.S. (2009). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press.
  5. Bonvin J.-M. (2008). Activation Policies, New Modes of Governance and the Issue of Responsibility. Social Policy and Society, 7(03): 367.
  6. Bonvin J.-M., Farvaque N. (2005). What Informational Basis for Assessing Job-Seekers?: Capabilities vs. Preferences. Review of Social Economy, 63(2): 269-289., DOI: 10.1080/0034676500130614
  7. Bonvin J.-M., Farvaque N. (2007). A capability approach to individualised and tailor-made activation. In Berkel R.v., Valkenburg B., eds., Making it Personal: Individualising Activation Services in the EU. Bristol: Policy Press.
  8. Bonvin J.-M., Orton M. (2009). Activation policies and organisational innovation: the added value of the capability approach. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(11): 565-574.
  9. Brodkin E.Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 2), i253-i277.
  10. Bruttel O., Sol E. (2006). Work First as a European model? Evidence from Germany and the Netherlands. Policy & Politics, 34(1): 69-89., DOI: 10.1332/03055730677521214
  11. Busilacchi G. (2006). Nuovo welfare e capacita dei soggetti. Stato e Mercato, 1: 91-126.
  12. Cockx B., Defourny A., Dejemeppe M., Van der Linden B. (2007). Le nouveau système de suivi des chômeurs: une évaluation. Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales, Universite catholique de Louvain.
  13. Crespo E., Serrano Pascual A. (2004). The EU’s concept of activation for young people: towards a new social contract? In Pascual A.S., ed., Are activation policies converging in Europe? The European Employment Strategy for young people. Brussels: ETUI.
  14. Dean H., Bonvin J.-M., Vielle P., Farvaque N. (2005). Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. European societies, 7(1): 3-26.
  15. Dif-Pradelier M., Rosenstein E., Bonvin J.-M. (2012). Vocational Training as an Integration Opportunity for Struggling Young Adults? A Swiss Case Study. Social Work and Society International Online Journal, 10(1).
  16. Eichhorst W., Konle-Seidl R. (2008). Contingent convergence: a comparative analysis of activation policies. IZA discussion papers.
  17. European Commission (2012). Proposal for a Council Recommendation on Establishing a Youth Guarantee. Brussels.
  18. Evans T., Harris J. (2004). Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6): 871-895.
  19. Farvaque N., Oliveau J.-B. (2004). L’insertion des jeunes peu diplomes dans l’emploi: opportunite de choix et contraintes. Document de travail Serie Regles, Institutions, Conventions, 04-11.
  20. Lindsay C., McQuaid R.W., Dutton M. (2007). New approaches to employability in the UK: combining ‘Human Capital Development’and ‘Work First’strategies. Journal of Social Policy, 36(4): 539-560. Lindsay C., McQuaid R.W., Dutton M. (2008). Inter-agency Cooperation and New Approaches to Employability. Social Policy & Administration, 42(7): 715-732., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00634.x
  21. Lipsky M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services (Updated ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  22. Meyers M.K., Vorsanger, S. (2007). Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In Peters B.G., Pierre J., eds., Handbook of Public Administration: Concise Paperback Edition: SAGE Publication, pp. 153-163.
  23. Muller P. (2010). Referentiel. In L.B. et al., ed., Dictionnaire des politiques publiques. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 555-562.
  24. Peck J., Theodore N. (2000). Beyond ‘employability’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(6): 729-749., DOI: 10.1093/cje/24.6.729
  25. Pohl A., Walther A. (2007). Activating the disadvantaged. Variations in addressing youth transitions across Europe. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(5): 533-553.
  26. Roed K., Zhang T. (2003). Does Unemployment Compensation Affect Unemployment Duration?*. The Economic Journal, 113(484): 190-206., DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00086
  27. Salais R. (2004a). Incorporating the capability approach into social and employment policies. In Salais R., Villeneuve R., eds., Europe and the politics of the capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Salais R. (2004b). Social Europe and the capability approach. Paper presented at the 4th International conference on the Capability Approach, 5-7 September, Pavia.
  29. Schmid G. (2014). Beyond Flexicurity – Active Securities for Flexible Employment Relationships. In Keune M., Serrano A., eds., Deconstructing Flexicurity and Developing Alternative Approaches. New York-London: Routledge.
  30. Scott P.G. (1997). Assessing determinants of bureaucratic discretion: An experiment in street-level decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1): 35-58.
  31. Sen A. (1990). Justice: Means versus Freedoms. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(2): 111-121.
  32. Sen A. (1979). Equality of What? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values – Delivered at the Stanford University.
  33. Sirovatka T. (2007). The individual approach in activation policy in the Czech Republic. In: van Berkel R., Valkenburg B., ed., Making it personal. Individualising activation services in the EU. Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 193-216.
  34. Vandenbroucke F. (1999). “Discours de Frank Vandenbroucke le 13 decembre 1999: Expose Den Uyl (L’Etat social actif)”. Amsterdam.
  35. Van Oorschot W. (2002). Miracle or nightmare? A critical review of Dutch activation policies and their outcomes. Journal of Social Policy, 31(3): 399-420.
  36. Wright S. (2012). Welfare-to-work, Agency and Personal Responsibility. Journal of Social Policy, 41(02): 309-328., DOI: 10.1017/S004727941100

Margherita Bussi, in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 141/2016, pp. 89-106, DOI:10.3280/SL2016-141006


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content