Click here to download

Perception and meaning making: epistemological and theoretical reflections and a technical proposal in the light of method in relational psychoanalysis
Journal Title: RICERCA PSICOANALITICA 
Author/s: Livio Provenzi 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  18 Pg. 75-92 FullText PDF:  105 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RPR2016-002006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Work in the field of infant research touched on questions of great relevance for psychoanalysis and stimulated theoretical, methodological and technical progress in psychoanalytically oriented relational psychotherapy. In particular, infant research collected plentiful evidence of the idea that the infant is active from the very beginning of life in the process of meaning making through perceptive modes acted in interaction with the infant’s physical and social world. But the role of perception as basic process of meaning making has not been studied in the psychoanalysis of the background relation. The aim of this article is to highlight at epistemological level the central role of perception for the emerging meaning making processes in infants and adults. The A. presents a theoretical methodological reflection on the relation between perception intention and interaction. To close the A. presents a technical suggestion for the use of perception inside the clinical situation of psychoanalysis of couple relations.
Keywords: Cooperative assessment, interaction, meaning making, perception, Rorschach

  1. Beebe B. e Lachmann F. M. (2002). Trad. it.: Infant Research e trattamento degli adulti. Un modello sistemico-diadico delle interazioni. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  2. Ben-Porat Y. S., Hostetler K., Butcher J. N. e Graham J. R. (1989). New subscales for the MMPI-2 Social Introversion (Si) scale. Psychological Assessment, 1, 169-174.
  3. Berne E. (2000). Trad. it.: Ciao!...e poi? Milano: Tascabili Bompiani.
  4. Butcher J. N. (1990). The MMPI-2 in psychological treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Butcher J. N., Dahlstrom W. G., Graham J. R., Tellegen A. M. e Kreammer B. (1989). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis. MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
  6. Damasio A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  7. DeCasper A. J. e Fifer W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208: 1174-1176.
  8. Exner J. E. Jr. (1996). Toward an understanding of Rorschach and MMPI relationships. In G. J. Meyer e R. Krishnamurthy (chairs), The Rorschach and MMPI disagree: Implications for research and practice. Denver, CO: Presentazione orale al meeting of the Society for Personality Assessment.
  9. Finn S. E. (1996). Assessment feedback integrating MMPI-2 and Rorschach findings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67: 543-557., 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_10DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_10
  10. Finn S. E. (2005). How psychological assessment taught me compassion and firmness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84: 29-32., 10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_07DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_07
  11. Finn S. E. (2007). In our clients’ shoes: Theory and techniques of therapeutic assessment. Manwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
  12. Finn S. E. (2008). Empathy, intersubjectivity, and the longing to be known: Why personality assessment works. In: Overton C. G. (chair), Conceptual Innovation in Personality Assessment. New Orleans, LA: Presentazione orale al meeting annuale della Society for Personality Assessment.
  13. Fischer C. T. e Finn S. E. (2008). Developing the life meaning of psychological test data: Collaborative and therapeutic approaches. In: R. P. Archer e S. R. Smith (editori), Personality assessment (pp. 379-404). New York: Routledge.
  14. Florita M. O. (2011). L’intreccio. Neuroscienze, clinica e teoria dei sistemi dinamici complessi. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  15. Fonagy P., Gergely G., & Target M. (2007). The parent-infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48: 288-328., 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01727.DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01727.
  16. Freud,S. (1985). Progetto di una psicologia per neurologi. In: Opere, vol. 2. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  17. Gergely G. e Watson J. S. (1996). The social biofeedback theory of parental affect-mirroring: The development of emotional self-awareness and self-control in infancy. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77: 1181-1212.
  18. Gill M. M. (1996). Trad. it.: Psicoanalisi in transizione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  19. Hebb D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.
  20. Hoehl S. e Paykariou S. (2012). The early development of face processing. What makes faces special? Neuroscience Bulletin, 28: 765-788.
  21. Hollenstein T. (2013). State Space Grids: Depicting dynamics across development. New York: Springer.
  22. Kandel E. R. (2007). Psichiatria, psicoanalisi e nuova biologia della mente. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  23. Legerstee M., Haley D. W. e Bornstein M. H. (2013). The infant mind. Origins of the social brain. New York: Guilford Press.
  24. Minolli M. (2009). Psicoanalisi della relazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  25. Minolli M. (2014). Essere e divenire. La sofferenza dell’individualismo. Milano: FrancoAngeli,.
  26. Minolli M. e Coin R. (2007). Amarsi, amando. Per una psicoanalisi della relazione di coppia. Roma: Borla.
  27. Montirosso R., Provenzi L., Tronick E., Morandi F., Reni G. e Borgatti R. (2014). Vagal tone as a biomarker of long-term memory for a stressful social event at 4 months. Developmental Psychobiology, 56: 1564-1574.
  28. Montirosso R., Tronick E., Morandi F., Ciceri, F. e Borgatti, R. (2013). Four-month-old infants’ long-term memory for a social stressful event. PLoS One, 8, e82277.
  29. Nakata T. e Trehub S. E. (2004). Infants’ responsiveness to maternal speech and singing. Infant Behavior & Development, 27: 455-464.
  30. Novellino M. (1991). Psicologia clinica dell’Io. Roma: Astrolabio Ubaldini.
  31. Porter R. H. e Winberg J. (1999). Unique salience of maternal breast odors for newborn infants. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23: 439-449.
  32. Provenzi L. (2013). Born to be wired. Il corpo alla base della natura intersoggettiva dell’essere umano. Psicomotricitià, 3: 3-6.
  33. Provenzi L., Borgatti R., Menozzi G. e Montirosso R. (2015). A dynamic system analysis of dyadic flexibility and stability across the Face-to-Face Still-Face procedure: Application of the State Space Grid. Infant Behavior & Development, 38: 1-10.
  34. Provenzi L. e Coin R. (2014). The rock and the lightining rod: MMPI-2 and Rorschach correlates of couple’s unconscious functionality emerging through collaborative assessment. Poster presentato al Collaborative/Therapeutic Assessment Conference, Austin, TX, USA.
  35. Reddy V. (2010). How infants know minds. London: Paperback.
  36. Rustin J. (2012). Infant research and psychoanalysis at work in psychotherapy. Expanding the clinical repertoire. New York: Norton & Company.
  37. Sander L. W. (1977). The regulation of exchange in the infant-caretaker system and some aspects of the context-content relationship. Trad. it. in: Carli L. e Rodini C. (2008), Le forme dell’intersoggettività. L’implicito e l’esplicito nelle relazioni interpersonali. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  38. Smith L. B. e Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 343-348.
  39. Stern D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
  40. Trevarthen C. (1989). Origins and directions for the concept of infant intersubjectivity. Newsletter of the Society for Research in Child Development.
  41. Tronick E. e Beeghly M. (2011). Infants’ meaning making and the development of mental health problems. American Psychologist, 66: 107-119.
  42. Schneider M. (2013). La presenza nella stanza di analisi. Note sulla relazione in psicologia e psicoanalisi nel tempo della complessità. Milano: Mimesis.
  43. The Boston Process of Change Study Group (2012). Il cambiamento in psicoterapia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  44. Westen D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47: 1061-1106.

Livio Provenzi, Perception and meaning making: epistemological and theoretical reflections and a technical proposal in the light of method in relational psychoanalysis in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 2/2016, pp. 75-92, DOI:10.3280/RPR2016-002006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content