Capitale, natura e città: ecologia politica urbana dell’inceneritore del Gerbido a Torino

Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Autori/Curatori: Silvia Crivello
Anno di pubblicazione: 2016 Fascicolo: 109 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 18 P. 22-39 Dimensione file: 516 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SUR2016-109003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Attraverso l’utilizzo del quadro teorico dell’ecologia politica urbana, l’articolo analizza i processi politico-economici alla base della costruzione dell’inceneritore per rifiuti del Gerbido a Torino. L’analisi ricostruisce le relazioni fra i flussi economici, il radicamento del capitale nel territorio e la produzione di nature urbane, mettendo in evidenza le strette interrelazioni fra logiche capitalistiche e produzione di spazi urbani.

  1. Agyeman J. (2002). Constructing environmental (in)justice: transatlantic tales. Environmental Politics, 11: 31-53. DOI: 10.1080/71400062
  2. Barbera F., Minervini D. (2012). Introduction to the symposium: new insights in actor network theory. Sociologica, 3. DOI: 10.2383/72699
  3. Blaikie P. (1985). The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. London: Longman.
  4. Bobbio L. (2002). Come smaltire i rifiuti. Un esperimento di democrazia deliberativa. Stato e mercato, 22: 101-142. DOI: 10.1425/117
  5. Bobbio L. (2011). Conflitti territoriali: sei interpretazioni. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 4: 79-88. DOI: 10.6092/1970-9870/569
  6. Boyatzis R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.
  7. Boyle M. (2002). Cleaning up after the Celtic Tiger: scalar ‘fixes’ in the political ecology of Tiger economies. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 27: 172-194. DOI: 10.1111/1475-5661.0004
  8. Broto V.C., Bulkeley H. (2013). Maintaining climate change experiments: urban political ecology and the everyday reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 1934-1948. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.1205
  9. Budds J. (2004). Power, nature and neoliberalism: the political ecology of water in Chile. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25: 322-342. DOI: 10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00189.
  10. Ceri P. (1987). Ecologia politica. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  11. Corvellec H., Zapata Campos M.J., Zapata P. (2013). Infrastructures, lock-in, and sustainable urban development: the case of waste incineration in the Göteborg Metropolitan Area. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50: 32-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.00
  12. Davies A.R. (2005). Incineration politics and the geographies of waste governance: a burning issue for Ireland? Environment and Planning C, 23: 375-397. DOI: 10.1068/c0413
  13. Davies A.R. (2008). Civil society activism and waste management in Ireland: the Carranstown anti-incineration campaign. Land Use Policy, 25: 161-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.04.00
  14. Davoudi S. (2006). The evidence-policy interface in strategic waste planning for urban environments: the technical and the social dimensions. Environment and planning C, 24: 681-700. DOI: 10.1068/c0609
  15. Desfor G., Keil R. (2004). Nature and the city: making environmental policy in Toronto and Los Angeles. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  16. Evans J.P. (2007). Wildlife corridors: an urban political ecology. Local Environment, 12: 129-152. DOI: 10.1080/1354983060113316
  17. Gandy M. (2004). Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city. City, 8: 363-379. DOI: 10.1080/136048104200031350
  18. Gandy M. (2005). Cyborg urbanization: complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International journal of urban and regional research, 29: 26-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00568.
  19. Gibbs D. (2002). Local economic development and the environment. London: Routledge.
  20. Gibbs D., Jonas A. (2000). Governance and regulation in local environmental policy: the utilityof a regime approach. Geoforum, 31: 299-313. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00052-
  21. Gille Z. (2010). Actor networks, modes of production, and waste regimes: reassembling the macro-social. Environment and Planning A, 42: 1049-1064. DOI: 10.1068/a4212
  22. Harvey D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
  23. Harvey D. (1993). The nature of environment: dialectics of social and environmental change. In Miliband R.. Panitch L. (eds). Real Problems, False Solutions. A special issue of the Socialist Register. London: The Merlin Press.
  24. Harvey D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
  25. Heynen N.C., Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (2006). Urban political ecology. Politicizing the production of urban natures. In Heynen N.C., Kaika M. and Swyngedouw E. (eds). In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  26. Jessop B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1: 159-174. DOI: 10.1080/1740590041000167450
  27. Kaika M. (2006). The political ecology of water scarcity. The 1989-1991 Athenian drought. In Heynen N.C., Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (eds). In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  28. Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (2000). Fetishizing the modern city: the phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24: 120-138. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.0023
  29. Keil R. (2003). Urban political ecology. Urban Geography, 24: 723-738. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.24.8.72
  30. Keil R. (2005). Progress report-urban political ecology. Urban Geography, 26: 640-651. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.26.7.64
  31. Kitchen L. (2013). Are trees always ‘good’? Urban political ecology and environmental justice in the valleys of South Wales. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 1968-1983. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01138.
  32. Latour B. (1993). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d'anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte; ed. it. (2009). Non siamo mai stati moderni. Saggio d'antropologia simmetrica. Milano: Elèuthera.
  33. Latour B. (1999). Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. Paris: La Découverte; ed. it (2000). Politiche della natura. Per una democrazia delle scienze. Milano: Cortina.
  34. Leonard L., Fagan H., Doran P. (2009). A burning issue? Governance and anti-incinerator campaigns in Ireland, North and South. Environmental politics, 18: 896-916. DOI: 10.1080/0964401090334567
  35. Lima M.L. (2004). On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. Journal of environmental psychology, 24: 71-84. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00026-
  36. Liverman D. (2004). Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94: 734-738.
  37. Lucido S. (2000). Attraverso la città: percorsi di ecologia politica. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  38. Minervini D. (2012). Waste valuation performed by socio-technical connections. Sociologica, 3. DOI: 10.2383/7270
  39. Monstadt J. (2009). Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: insights from technology and urban studies. Environment and planning A, 41: 1924-1942. DOI: 10.1068/a414
  40. Murray M. (2009). Waste management in Ireland: discourses of domination in an (un)reflexive society. The Sociological Review, 57: 81-101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.01805.
  41. Myers G.A. (2008). Peri-urban land reform, political-economic reform, and urban political ecology in Zanzibar. Urban Geography, 29: 264-288. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.29.3.26
  42. Pelling M. (2003). Toward a political ecology of urban environmental risk. The case of Guyana. In Zimmerer K., Bassett T. (eds). Political ecology. An integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies. London: Guilford Press.
  43. Pellizzoni L. (2011). Introduzione. In Pellizzoni L. (a cura di). Conflitti ambientali. Esperti, politica e istituzioni nelle controversie ambientali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  44. Pellow D.N. (2006). Transnational alliances and global politics: new geographies of urban environmental justice struggles. In Heynen N.C., Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (eds). In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  45. ISPRA (2012). Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani 2012. www.isprambiente.gov.it
  46. Schlosberg D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22: 37-55. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2013.75538
  47. Snary C. (2004). Understanding risk: the planning officers’ perspective. Urban studies, 41: 33-55. DOI: 10.1080/004209803200015567
  48. Struffi L. (2011). Ruolo degli esperti nella controversia sull’inceneritore di Trento. In Pellizzoni L. (a cura di). Conflitti ambientali. Esperti, politica e istituzioni nelle controversie ambientali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  49. Saikkonen P. (2013). From unknown problem to an acknowledged local environmental problem a case of polluted soil in the city of Helsinki. Local Environment, 18: 888-903. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2012.73865
  50. Swyngedouw E., Kaika M. (2000). The environment of the city or… the urbanisation of nature. In Bridge G., Watson S. (eds). Companion to urban studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
  51. Swyngedouw E., Heynen N.C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35: 898-918. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.
  52. Swyngedouw E. (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water. Flows of power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  53. Swyngedouw E. (2006). Circulations and metabolisms: (hybrid) natures and (cyborg) cities. Science as culture, 15: 105-121. DOI: 10.1080/0950543060070797
  54. Tipaldo G. (2011). Among ‘Bananas’ and ‘Backyards’: a statistical analysis of the effect of risk and scientific literacy on the attitude towards a waste co-incinerator. International Review of Social Research, 3: 53-72. DOI: 10.1515/irsr-2011-002
  55. Walker G. (2009). Beyond distribution and proximity: exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode, 41: 614-636. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.
  56. Walsh E.R., Warland R. (1997). Don’t burn it here: grassroots challenges to trash incinerators. University Park (Pe): Penn State University Press.
  57. Véron R. (2006). Remaking urban environments: the political ecology of air pollution in Delhi. Environment and Planning A, 38: 2093-2109. DOI: 10.1068/a3744
  58. Wilts H. (2012). The Ambiguous Relation Between Waste Incineration and Waste Prevention. In Karagiannidis A. (ed). Waste to energy. London: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2306-4_1
  59. Wolch J., Pincetl S., Pulido L. (2002). Urban nature and the nature of urbanism. In Dear M.J. (ed). From Chicago to L.A.: making sense of urban theory. London: Sage. Zimmer A. (2010). Urban political ecology: theoretical concepts, challenges, and suggested future directions. Erdkunde, 64: 343-354. DOI: 10.3112/erdkunde.2010.04.0

Silvia Crivello, Capitale, natura e città: ecologia politica urbana dell’inceneritore del Gerbido a Torino in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 109/2016, pp 22-39, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2016-109003