Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Capitale, natura e città: ecologia politica urbana dell’inceneritore del Gerbido a Torino
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Autori/Curatori: Silvia Crivello 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: 109  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 22-39 Dimensione file:  516 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2016-109003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Attraverso l’utilizzo del quadro teorico dell’ecologia politica urbana, l’articolo analizza i processi politico-economici alla base della costruzione dell’inceneritore per rifiuti del Gerbido a Torino. L’analisi ricostruisce le relazioni fra i flussi economici, il radicamento del capitale nel territorio e la produzione di nature urbane, mettendo in evidenza le strette interrelazioni fra logiche capitalistiche e produzione di spazi urbani.


Keywords: Ecologia politica urbana, città, natura, inceneritore, Gerbido, Torino.

  1. Agyeman J. (2002). Constructing environmental (in)justice: transatlantic tales. Environmental Politics, 11: 31-53., DOI: 10.1080/71400062
  2. Barbera F., Minervini D. (2012). Introduction to the symposium: new insights in actor network theory. Sociologica, 3., DOI: 10.2383/72699
  3. Blaikie P. (1985). The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries. London: Longman.
  4. Bobbio L. (2002). Come smaltire i rifiuti. Un esperimento di democrazia deliberativa. Stato e mercato, 22: 101-142., DOI: 10.1425/117
  5. Bobbio L. (2011). Conflitti territoriali: sei interpretazioni. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 4: 79-88., DOI: 10.6092/1970-9870/569
  6. Boyatzis R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.
  7. Boyle M. (2002). Cleaning up after the Celtic Tiger: scalar ‘fixes’ in the political ecology of Tiger economies. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 27: 172-194., DOI: 10.1111/1475-5661.0004
  8. Broto V.C., Bulkeley H. (2013). Maintaining climate change experiments: urban political ecology and the everyday reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 1934-1948., DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.1205
  9. Budds J. (2004). Power, nature and neoliberalism: the political ecology of water in Chile. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25: 322-342., DOI: 10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00189.
  10. Ceri P. (1987). Ecologia politica. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  11. Corvellec H., Zapata Campos M.J., Zapata P. (2013). Infrastructures, lock-in, and sustainable urban development: the case of waste incineration in the Göteborg Metropolitan Area. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50: 32-39., DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.00
  12. Davies A.R. (2005). Incineration politics and the geographies of waste governance: a burning issue for Ireland? Environment and Planning C, 23: 375-397., DOI: 10.1068/c0413
  13. Davies A.R. (2008). Civil society activism and waste management in Ireland: the Carranstown anti-incineration campaign. Land Use Policy, 25: 161-172., DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.04.00
  14. Davoudi S. (2006). The evidence-policy interface in strategic waste planning for urban environments: the technical and the social dimensions. Environment and planning C, 24: 681-700., DOI: 10.1068/c0609
  15. Desfor G., Keil R. (2004). Nature and the city: making environmental policy in Toronto and Los Angeles. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  16. Evans J.P. (2007). Wildlife corridors: an urban political ecology. Local Environment, 12: 129-152., DOI: 10.1080/1354983060113316
  17. Gandy M. (2004). Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city. City, 8: 363-379., DOI: 10.1080/136048104200031350
  18. Gandy M. (2005). Cyborg urbanization: complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International journal of urban and regional research, 29: 26-49., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00568.
  19. Gibbs D. (2002). Local economic development and the environment. London: Routledge.
  20. Gibbs D., Jonas A. (2000). Governance and regulation in local environmental policy: the utilityof a regime approach. Geoforum, 31: 299-313., DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00052-
  21. Gille Z. (2010). Actor networks, modes of production, and waste regimes: reassembling the macro-social. Environment and Planning A, 42: 1049-1064., DOI: 10.1068/a4212
  22. Harvey D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
  23. Harvey D. (1993). The nature of environment: dialectics of social and environmental change. In Miliband R.. Panitch L. (eds). Real Problems, False Solutions. A special issue of the Socialist Register. London: The Merlin Press.
  24. Harvey D. (1996). Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
  25. Heynen N.C., Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (2006). Urban political ecology. Politicizing the production of urban natures. In Heynen N.C., Kaika M. and Swyngedouw E. (eds). In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  26. Jessop B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1: 159-174., DOI: 10.1080/1740590041000167450
  27. Kaika M. (2006). The political ecology of water scarcity. The 1989-1991 Athenian drought. In Heynen N.C., Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (eds). In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  28. Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (2000). Fetishizing the modern city: the phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24: 120-138., DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.0023
  29. Keil R. (2003). Urban political ecology. Urban Geography, 24: 723-738., DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.24.8.72
  30. Keil R. (2005). Progress report-urban political ecology. Urban Geography, 26: 640-651., DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.26.7.64
  31. Kitchen L. (2013). Are trees always ‘good’? Urban political ecology and environmental justice in the valleys of South Wales. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37: 1968-1983., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01138.
  32. Latour B. (1993). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d'anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte; ed. it. (2009). Non siamo mai stati moderni. Saggio d'antropologia simmetrica. Milano: Elèuthera.
  33. Latour B. (1999). Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. Paris: La Découverte; ed. it (2000). Politiche della natura. Per una democrazia delle scienze. Milano: Cortina.
  34. Leonard L., Fagan H., Doran P. (2009). A burning issue? Governance and anti-incinerator campaigns in Ireland, North and South. Environmental politics, 18: 896-916., DOI: 10.1080/0964401090334567
  35. Lima M.L. (2004). On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. Journal of environmental psychology, 24: 71-84., DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00026-
  36. Liverman D. (2004). Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94: 734-738.
  37. Lucido S. (2000). Attraverso la città: percorsi di ecologia politica. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  38. Minervini D. (2012). Waste valuation performed by socio-technical connections. Sociologica, 3., DOI: 10.2383/7270
  39. Monstadt J. (2009). Conceptualizing the political ecology of urban infrastructures: insights from technology and urban studies. Environment and planning A, 41: 1924-1942., DOI: 10.1068/a414
  40. Murray M. (2009). Waste management in Ireland: discourses of domination in an (un)reflexive society. The Sociological Review, 57: 81-101., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2008.01805.
  41. Myers G.A. (2008). Peri-urban land reform, political-economic reform, and urban political ecology in Zanzibar. Urban Geography, 29: 264-288., DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.29.3.26
  42. Pelling M. (2003). Toward a political ecology of urban environmental risk. The case of Guyana. In Zimmerer K., Bassett T. (eds). Political ecology. An integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies. London: Guilford Press.
  43. Pellizzoni L. (2011). Introduzione. In Pellizzoni L. (a cura di). Conflitti ambientali. Esperti, politica e istituzioni nelle controversie ambientali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  44. Pellow D.N. (2006). Transnational alliances and global politics: new geographies of urban environmental justice struggles. In Heynen N.C., Kaika M., Swyngedouw E. (eds). In the nature of cities: urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. London: Taylor & Francis.
  45. ISPRA (2012). Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani 2012. www.isprambiente.gov.it
  46. Schlosberg D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22: 37-55., DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2013.75538
  47. Snary C. (2004). Understanding risk: the planning officers’ perspective. Urban studies, 41: 33-55., DOI: 10.1080/004209803200015567
  48. Struffi L. (2011). Ruolo degli esperti nella controversia sull’inceneritore di Trento. In Pellizzoni L. (a cura di). Conflitti ambientali. Esperti, politica e istituzioni nelle controversie ambientali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  49. Saikkonen P. (2013). From unknown problem to an acknowledged local environmental problem a case of polluted soil in the city of Helsinki. Local Environment, 18: 888-903., DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2012.73865
  50. Swyngedouw E., Kaika M. (2000). The environment of the city or… the urbanisation of nature. In Bridge G., Watson S. (eds). Companion to urban studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
  51. Swyngedouw E., Heynen N.C. (2003). Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, 35: 898-918., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.
  52. Swyngedouw E. (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water. Flows of power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  53. Swyngedouw E. (2006). Circulations and metabolisms: (hybrid) natures and (cyborg) cities. Science as culture, 15: 105-121., DOI: 10.1080/0950543060070797
  54. Tipaldo G. (2011). Among ‘Bananas’ and ‘Backyards’: a statistical analysis of the effect of risk and scientific literacy on the attitude towards a waste co-incinerator. International Review of Social Research, 3: 53-72., DOI: 10.1515/irsr-2011-002
  55. Walker G. (2009). Beyond distribution and proximity: exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode, 41: 614-636., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00691.
  56. Walsh E.R., Warland R. (1997). Don’t burn it here: grassroots challenges to trash incinerators. University Park (Pe): Penn State University Press.
  57. Véron R. (2006). Remaking urban environments: the political ecology of air pollution in Delhi. Environment and Planning A, 38: 2093-2109., DOI: 10.1068/a3744
  58. Wilts H. (2012). The Ambiguous Relation Between Waste Incineration and Waste Prevention. In Karagiannidis A. (ed). Waste to energy. London: Springer., DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2306-4_1
  59. Wolch J., Pincetl S., Pulido L. (2002). Urban nature and the nature of urbanism. In Dear M.J. (ed). From Chicago to L.A.: making sense of urban theory. London: Sage. Zimmer A. (2010). Urban political ecology: theoretical concepts, challenges, and suggested future directions. Erdkunde, 64: 343-354., DOI: 10.3112/erdkunde.2010.04.0

Silvia Crivello, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 109/2016, pp. 22-39, DOI:10.3280/SUR2016-109003

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche