Click here to download

Syrian refugees on the seaborne Turkish routes toward Greece. Reflections on transit and the emptying process of the right to asylum
Journal Title: MONDI MIGRANTI 
Author/s: Chiara Denaro 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  23 Pg. 97-119 FullText PDF:  96 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MM2016-001006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


In the frame of the evolution of the seaborne migratory routes, which occurred between 2011 and 2015 in the Mediterranean space and the new centrality of the eastern corridor, the article focuses on the Greek Turkish border, intended as a mechanism of differential inclusion (Mezzadra e Neilson, 2013). The configuration of Greece as a transit space on the so-called Balkan route, which includes the crossing of Macedonia, Serbia, Hungary and Austria with the aim of reaching Germany or continuing to other Northern European countries is read in light of the manifest inappropriateness of Greece as a country of asylum, already ascertained by the ECtHR in 2011 and 2014. The article, by interpreting the right to asylum as an ‘access door’ to a room of civil, political and social rights, and by observing its progressive emptying process (Sciurba, 2014), analyses its content in certain border spaces. It is conceptualized in terms of access to the territory, access to the procedure and the refugee status, access to the first accommodation. The article ends with a reflection on refugees’ transit throughout Europe, which takes shape in the form of empowerment and resistance, and seems to be deeply connected with the emptying process of the right to asylum.
Keywords: Asylum, Greece, migratory routes, transit, agency, Syrian refugees

  1. Abdelfattah D. (2011). The impact of Arab Revolts on Migration, Carim AS 2011-68, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI): European University Institute.
  2. Asylum Information Database (Aida). Access and forms of reception condition –Turkey, disponibile al sito: http://www.asylumineurope.org/ reports/country/turkey/access-and-forms-reception-conditions (visualizzato 28.8.2015).
  3. Amnesty International (2014a). The Human Cost of Fortress Europe, London: Amnesty, disponibile al sito: http://www.amnesty.eu/content/assets/Reports/EUR_050012014__Fortress_Europe_complete_web_EN.pdf (visualizzato 25.11.2014).
  4. Amnesty International (2014b). Greece: Frontier of hope and fear – migrants and refugees pushed back at Europe’s border, online suhttps://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/EUR25/004/2014/en/ (visualizzato 23.6. 2015).
  5. Amnesty International (2014c). Struggling to survive. Refugees from Syria in Turkey, online su https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/EUR44/017/2014/en/(visualizzato 20.8.2015).
  6. Anzaldúa G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza, San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
  7. Archer C. (2014). The EU’s Failure to Protect: Violations of the Non-Refoulement Principle in the EU Asylum System, online su http://europe.unc.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2014/02/TheEU.pdf (visualizzato 20.8.2014).
  8. Baldwin-Edwards M. (2006). Migration between Greece and Turkey: from the ‘Exchange of Populations’ to the non-recognition of borders. Seer-South-East Europe Review for Labour and Social Affairs. 3: 115-122.
  9. Baldwin-Edwards M. (2005).Migration in the Middle East and the Mediterranean. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Commission on International Migration. Bourdieu P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7, 1: 14-25.
  10. Campesi G. (2014). Frontex, the Euro-Mediterranean Border and the Paradoxes of Humanitarian Rhetoric, South East European Journal of Political Science, II, 3: pp. 126-134, disponibile al sito: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2519410 (visualizzato 5.11.2014).
  11. Çarkoğlu A. & Rubin B., a cura di (2003). Turkey and the European Union: Domestic Politics, Economic Integration and International Dynamics, Frank Cass: Castles S. (2014). International Migration at a crossroads, Citizenship Studies, 18, 2: 190- 207.
  12. Conquergood D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: towards a critical cultural politics, Communication Monographs, 58, 2: 179-194. Cuttitta P. (2007). Le monde-frontière. Le contrôle de l’immigration dans l’espace globalisé. Cultures & Conflits, online su http://conflits.revues.org/5593 (visualizzato 20 novembre 2015).
  13. De Genova N. (2005). Working the Boundaries: Race, Space, and “Illegality” in Mexican Chicago. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  14. De Haas H. (2006). Trans-Sahara Migration to Northern Africa and EU: Historical roots and current trends, Migration Policy Institute, 1 novembre.
  15. Denaro C. (2016). The Reconfiguration of Mediterranean Migration Routes after the War in Syria: Narratives on the Egyptian Route to Italy and Beyond. In: Ribas-Mateos N., a cura di. cit.
  16. Denaro C. (2015a). The Mediterranean Sea as transnational space and (struggle) field. Reflections on the critical “sea-watching phenomenon” as a new form of citizenship. Feministisches Geo-RundMail, 64: 15-20.
  17. Denaro C. (2015b). How to re-conceptualize the right to asylum in the lethal seacrossing age?, Refugee Review: Re-conceptualizing Refugees and Forced Migration in the 21st Century, 2, 1: 199-201.
  18. Denaro C. (2015c). The endless flight of Syrian refugees. Reflections on Italy as a transit space: focus on Catania and Milan. Paper presentato alla XII Conferenza della Società Italiana di Studi sul Medio Oriente (SeSaMo) dal titolo Beyond the Arab Uprisings: rediscovering the Mena region. UniversitàCa’ Foscari,
  19. Venezia, 16-17 gennaio 2015.
  20. Fargues F. e S. Bonfanti (2014). When the best option is s leaky boat: why migrants risk their lives crossing the Mediterranean and what Europe is doing about it, Migration Policy Center, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI): European University Institute.
  21. Fargues F. (2009). Work, Refuge, Transit: An Emerging Pattern of Irregular Immigration South and East of the Mediterranean, International Migration Review, 43, 3: 544–557.
  22. Fiddian E.-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long e N. Sigona, a cura di (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Gold R. (1958). Roles in sociological field observation. Social Forces, 36: 217-213.
  24. Goodwin-Gill G.S. (2011). The right to seek asylum: Interception at sea and the principle of non-refoulement. International Journal of Refugee Law, 23, 3: 443-457;, DOI: 10.1093/ijrl/eer018
  25. Human Rights Watch (2014). Bulgaria, New Evidence Syrians Forced Back to Turkey, disponibile al sito: https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/09/18/bulgarianew-evidence-syrians-forced-back-turkey (visualizzato1.1.2015).
  26. İçduygu A. e Yükserek D. (2012) Rethinking Transit Migration in Turkey: Reality and Re- presentation in the Creation of a Migratory Phenomenon. Population, Space and Place, 18, 4: 414-456.
  27. Jansen Y., Celikates R. and de Bloois J., a cura di (2015). The Irregularization of Migration inContemporary Europe. Detention, Deportation, Drowning, London – New York, Rowman&Littlefield. Karamanidou L. e Schuster L. (2012). Realizing One'sRights under the 1951 Convention 60Years On: A Review of Practical Constraints on Accessing Protection in Europe. Journal of Refugee Studies, 25, 2: 169-192;, DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fer053
  28. Kilberg R. (2014). Turkey’s Evolving Migration Identity, Migration Policy Institute, disponibile al sito: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/turkeysevolving-migration-identity (visualizzato 30.6.2015).
  29. Kirişci K. (2003). The Question of Asylum and Illegal Migration in European Union-Turkish Relations. In: Çarkoğlu A. & Rubin B., a cura di. cit.: 79-106.
  30. Kirişci K. (2007). Turkey: A country of transition from emigration to immigration. Mediterranean politics, 12, 1, 91-97.
  31. Lefebvre H. (1974). La production de l'espace. L’Homme et la société, 31, 1, 15-32.
  32. Mezzadra S. (2015). The proliferation of borders and the right to escape. In: Jansen Y., Celikates R. and de Bloois J., a cura di (2015). cit.: 121-135.
  33. Mezzadra S. e Neilson B. (2013). Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham: Duke University Press.
  34. Monzini P. (2007). Sea-border crossings: The organization of irregular migration to Italy. Mediterranean Politics 12, 2: 163-184.
  35. Oim (2016). Missing Migrant Project, disponibile al sito: http://missingmigrants. iom.int/mediterranean.
  36. Oim (2014). Fatal Journeys. Tracking lives lost during migration, Geneva: Iom, disponibile al sito: http://publications.iom.int/bookstore/free/FatalJourneys_CountingtheUncounted.pdf (visualizzato 25.11.2014).
  37. Pro Asyl (2013). Pushed back, online su http://www.proasyl.de/en/press/press/news/pro_asyl_releases_new_report_pushed_back/ (visualizzato 20.6.2015).
  38. Pro Asyl (2007). The Truthmight be Bitter butit Must be Told’: The Situation of Refugees in the Aegean and the Practices of the GreekCoastGuards, online su http://www.proasyl.de/fileadmin/proasyl/fm_redakteure/Englisch/Griechenland bericht_Engl.pdf (visualizzato 18.2.2016).
  39. Ribas-Mateos N., a cura di (2016). Spaces of Refugee Flight: Migration and Mobilities after the Arab Spring in the Eastern Mediterranean. Edward Elgar Publishing (data prevista per pubblicazione, Agosto, 2016).
  40. Ribas-Mateos N. (2015). Border Shifts: New Mobilities in Europe and Beyond. Palgrave Macmillan;, DOI: 10.1057/9781137493590
  41. Ribas-Mateos N. (2014). Mobilities post-2011: transformations over time or sudden change, paper presentato alla Conferenza Internazionale Guests and Aliens.
  42. Re-configuring new mobilities in the Eastern Mediterranean after 2011, Ifea, Istanbul, 9-10 dicembre 2014.
  43. Sciurba A. (2014).‘Dopo Lampedusa: la nuova sfida del diritto d'asilo allo spazio europeo emediterraneo’, paper presentato al Convegno Internazionale Le frontiere mobile del Mediterraneo, Università di Palermo, 3-4 novembre 2014.
  44. Scheel S. e Squire V. (2014). Forced Migrants as Illegal Migrants. In Fiddian E.- Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long e N. Sigona, a cura di. cit.: 188-199.
  45. Schuster L. (2011). Turning refugees into ‘illegal migrants’: Afghan asylum seek-ers in Europe. Ethnical and Racial Studies, 34, 8: 1392-1407.
  46. Schuster L. (2000). A Comparison of Asylum Policy in Seven European States, Journal of Refugee Studies, 13, 1: 118-132.
  47. Unhcr (2016a). Syria Regional Response. Inter Agency information sharing, available at: http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/regional.php, (visualizzato 6.7.’15).
  48. Unhcr (2016b). Europe:SyrianAsylum Applications, disponibile al sito: http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/asylum.php (visualizzato 30.6.2015)
  49. Unhcr (2016c). Refugees/Migrants Emergency Response: Mediterranean http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/regional.php (visualizzato 2.10.2015).
  50. Unhcr (2009). Observation on Greece as a country of asylum, disponibile al sito: http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/search?page=search&docid =4b4c7c329 &query=Greece (visualizzato 20.10.2015).
  51. Van Houtum H. e F. Boedeltje (2009). ‘Europe’s shame: death at the borders of the EU, Antipode, 41, 2: 226-230;, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00670.x
  52. Yelmaz B. (2014). The readmission agreement between EU and Turkey, Tesi di Master in International Public Law, Uppsala University.

Chiara Denaro, Syrian refugees on the seaborne Turkish routes toward Greece. Reflections on transit and the emptying process of the right to asylum in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 1/2016, pp. 97-119, DOI:10.3280/MM2016-001006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content