Clicca qui per scaricare

Sistemi locali di Network Governance in Sanità secondo una prospettiva di genere
Titolo Rivista: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Autori/Curatori: Silvia Cervia 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 43-60 Dimensione file:  75 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2016-003004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The Fourth World Conference on Women, held in Beijing, led to increased international efforts to scale up gender mainstreaming across public policies, including health. From that moment onwards, there was increasing attention on the development of a women’s health agenda and on considering gender as a determinant of health. This was not the case for equality in the decision-making process. Although the international literature emphasizes the importance of the process for the definition of gender-sensitive policies, and despite official documents stressing this point, this issue remains in the shadows. The article aims to offer an approach based on gender to analyse the different health governance assets. The rules to accessing governance bodies and the rules for the composition of interests will be considered as fundamental filters when defining policies and when assessing their effects on gender.


Keywords: Governance sanitaria; genere; sistema sanitario; politiche sanitarie; processo decisionale; network governance

  1. Abdool S.N., García-Moreno C., Amin A. (2012). Gender Equality and International Health Policy Planning. In: Kuhlmann E., Annandale E., editors, The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare. London: Palgrave.
  2. Ansell C. (2012). Collaborative Governance. In: Levi-Faur D., editor, The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Ansell C., Gash A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4): 543-571., DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum03
  4. Ashworth G. (1996). Gendered Governance: an Agenda for Change. Testo disponibile al sito: http://nird.ap.nic.in/clic/rrdl100.html. Data di accesso: dicembre 2015.
  5. Barnes M., Knops A., Newman J., Sullivan H. (2004). The micro-politics of deliberation: case studies in public participation. Contemporary Politics, 10(2): 93-110., DOI: 10.1080/135697704200027875
  6. Barnes M., Newman J., Knops A., Sullivan H. (2003). Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation. Public Administration, 81(2): 379-99., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.0035
  7. Batson V. (2004). Shared governance in an integrated health care network. Association of Operating Room Nurses, 80(3): 493-512., DOI: 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)60540-
  8. Bedford K. (2013), Gender, Institutions, and Multilevel Governance. In: Waylen G., Celis K., Kantola J., Weldon S.L., editors, The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  9. Bevir M., editor (2011). The Sage Handobook of Governance. London: Sage.
  10. Biancheri R. (2014). Dalla medicina di genere al genere in salute. Salute e Società, 1: 17-33., DOI: 10.3280/SES2014-00100
  11. Blackmore J. (2011). Bureaucratic, Corporate/market and Network Governance: Shifting Spaces for Gender Equity in Education. Gender, Work and Organization, 18 (5): 443-466., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00505.
  12. Brody A. (2009). Gender and governance: Overview report. Brighton: Cutting Edge Pack.
  13. Brush L. (2003). Gender and Governance. Walnut City: Altamira. Campbell K.B. (2005). Theorizing the authentic: identity, engagement, and public space. Administration & Society, 36(6): 688-705., DOI: 10.1177/0095-39970427058
  14. Castells M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Vol 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
  15. Cervia S. (2014). La partecipazione dei cittadini in Sanità. Italia ed Europa a confronto. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  16. Commissione Europea (2008). Manuale per l’integrazione di genere. Lussemburgo: Ufficio delle pubblicazioni ufficiali delle Comunità europee.
  17. Coney S. (2004). Effective consumer voice and participation for New Zealand: A systematic review of the evidence. Wellington: New Zealand Guidelines Group.
  18. Davis K. (2002). Feminist Body/Politics as World Traveller Translating Our Bodies, Ourselves. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 9(3): 223-247., DOI: 10.1177/135050680200900337
  19. Di Gaetano A., Strom E. (2003). Comparative Urban Governance. An Integrated Approach. Urban Affairs Review, 38(3): 356-395., DOI: 10.1177/10780874022-3880
  20. Dolhinow R. (2010). A Jumble of Needs: Women’s Activism and Neoliberalism in the Colonias of the Southwest. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
  21. Donner L. (2003). Including Gender in Health Planning: A Guide for Regional Health Authorities. Winnipeg: Prairie Women’s Health Centre of Excellence.
  22. Doyal L. (1994). Changing medicine? Gender and the politics of health care. In: Gabe J., Kelleher D. and Williams G., editors, Challenging Medicine. London-New York: Routledge.
  23. Dwyer J. (1989). The politics of participation. Community Health Studies, 8(1): 59-65., DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1989.tb00177.
  24. Ely R.J., Meyerson D.E. (2000). Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22: 103-151., DOI: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-
  25. Emerson K., Nabatchi T., Balogh S. (2011). An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22: 1-29., DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur01
  26. Ferlie E. et alii (2010). Networks in Health Care: a Comparative Study of Their Management, Impact and Performance. London: HMSO.
  27. Fraser N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: Calhoun C., editor, Habermas and the public sphere. London: MIT Press.
  28. Fraser N. (1995), Recognition or Redistribution? A Critical Reading of Iris Young’s Justice and the Politics of Difference. The Journal of Political Philosophy, III (2): 166-180., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.1995.tb00033.
  29. Giarelli G. (2003). Il malessere della medicina. Un confronto internazionale. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  30. Graddy E.A., Chen B. (2006). Influences on the size and scope of networks for social service delivery. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16: 533–52., DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muj00
  31. Hoeijmakers M., Kenis P., de Leeuw E. and de Vries N.K. (2007). Local health policy development processes. An expanded toolbox. Health Promotion International, 22(2): 112–21., DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum01
  32. Hudson B. (2004). Analysing network partnerships. Public Management Review, 6(1): 75–91., DOI: 10.1080/1471903041000167574
  33. Jayal N.G. (2003). Locatin Gender in the Governance Discourse. In: Nussbaum M., Basu A., Tambiah Y., Jayal N.G., Essays on Gender and Governance, New York: UNPD.
  34. Klijn E.H., Koppenjan J. (2015), Governance Networks in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
  35. MacDonald L., Mills L. (2010). Gender, Democracy and Federalism in Mexico. In: M. Haussman, M. Sawer and J.Vickers, editors, Federalism, Feminism and Multilevel Governance. Surrey: Ashgate.
  36. Mackay F. (2010). Devolution and the Multilevel Politics of Gender in the UK: The Case of Scotland. In: M. Haussman, M. Sawer and J. Vickers, editors, Federalism, Feminism and Multilevel Governance. London: Ashgate.
  37. Mahon R., Collier C. (2010). Navigating the Shoals of Canadian Federalism: Childcare Advocacy. In: M. Haussman et al., editors, Federalism, Feminism and Multilevel Governance. Burlington VT: Ashgate.
  38. Marafioti E., Mariani L., Martini M. (2014). Exploring the Effect of Network Governance Models on Health-Care Systems Performance. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(13): 987-998., DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2014.94499
  39. Mayntz R. (1999). La teoria della governance: sfide e prospettive. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, XXIX (1): 3-21., DOI: 10.1426/163
  40. McGuire M. (2011). Network Management. In: Bevir M. (ed.), The Sage Handobook of Governance. London, Sage.
  41. O’Toole L.J., Meier K.J. (2006). Networking in the penumbra: Public management, cooptative links, and distributional consequences. International Public Management Journal, 9(3): 271–94.
  42. Olsen L. (2009). EU governance: Where do we go from here?. In: Kohler-Koch B. and Larat F., editors, European Multi-level Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  43. Payne S. (2009). How can gender equity be addressed through health systems. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  44. Perri 6, Goodwin N., Peck E. and Freeman T. (2006). Managing Networks of Twenty First Century Organisations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  45. Provan K.G., Kenis P.N. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2): 229-252., DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum01
  46. Rhodes R.A.W. (2000). Governance and public administration. In: Pierre J., editor, Debating governance, authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Ring P.S., Van de Ven A.H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19: 90–118. Ruspini E., Rossi M. (2014). Sguardi sociologici sulla Medicina di Genere. Una ricerca mediata dal web. In: Cipolla C., Maturo A., a cura di, Sociologia della salute e web society. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  48. Ryfe D.M. (2002). The practice of deliberative democracy: a study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication, 19(3): 359-77., DOI: 10.1080/0195747029005554
  49. Scavo A. (2015). Governance le reti. La multi-network governance. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  50. Segatori R. (2012). Letture sociologiche del concetto di governance. In: D’Albergo E., Segatori R., a cura di, Governance e partecipazione politica. Teorie e ricerche sociologiche. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  51. Sen G., Östlin P., George A. (2007). Unequal, unfair, ineffective and inefficient. Gender inequity in health: why it exists and how we can change it. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  52. Stoker G. (1998). Governance as a Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(1): 17-28., DOI: 10.1111/1468-2451.0010
  53. Theobald S., Tolhurst R., Elsey H., Standing H. (2005). Engendering the bureaucracy? Challenges and opportunities for mainstreaming genders in Ministries of Helath under sector-wide approaches. Health Policy Plan. 20(3): 141-149., DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czi01
  54. Torfing J. (2005). Governance network theory: towards a second generation. European Political Science, 4: 305–315., DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.221003
  55. Torfing J. (2012). Governance network. In: Levi-Faur D, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  56. United Nation (1995). Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/bejingmnu.htm. Data di accesso: febbraio 2016.
  57. Willem A., Gemmel P. (2013). Do governance choices matter in health care networks?: an exploratory configuration study of health care networks. BMC Health Services Research, 13: 229., DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-22
  58. Wittel A. (2001). Toward a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18 (6): 51–76., DOI: 10.1177/02632760101800600
  59. Wittenberg-Cox A., Maitland A. (2008). Why Women Mean Business: Understanding the Emergence of our next Economic Revolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  60. Zimmerman M.K, Hill S.A. (2000). Reforming gendered health care: an assessment of change. International Journal of Health Services, 30(4): 771-95., DOI: 10.2190/LYUV-QEPA-4JBG-G18

Silvia Cervia, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3/2016, pp. 43-60, DOI:10.3280/SES2016-003004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche