Click here to download

Multiple discrimination at work: Gaining entry to the Swedish workforce
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO  
Author/s: Eva Schoemer 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  22 Pg. 117-138 FullText PDF:  407 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SD2016-002008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This article discusses the role played by the law in personal experiences of marginalization from Swedish society from the perspective of sociology of law through the framework of intersectional. Like many legal issues, discrimination dwells in the world of everyday life, work life, and society. While most of the social sciences deploy a varied array of methods and methodological approaches, across a wide range of problems, the field of legal scholarship usually confines itself to just one method: the so-called legal dogmatic method. The author argues for an expanded methodology of jurisprudence when it comes to the area of anti-discrimination, since acts of discrimination ultimately violate not the rights of their immediate victim, but also the rights of all people who find themselves in similar situations. When a court finds a specific act - say, the use of a racial slur - not discriminatory in a particular context, it can easily lead to a public perception that racial slurs are not discriminatory in general. This creates a mechanism by which people who do not ‘look like everyone else’ - people of colour, people who wear headscarves, people who come from regions that get bad press - come to be excluded from society. To tear down the walls around discrimination victims, we will have to extend and refine the traditional legal dogmatic method. One way to begin might be if the rulings of the Labour Court could take into account more than just ‘black letter law’, the law in books. The Court might seek to understand how their rulings will be received and what signals they will send to society about law in action.
Keywords: Intersectionality - Discrimination - Gender - Feminism - Multiple discrimination - Marginalization

  1. Ahmed, Sara, 2011. Vithetens hegemoni. [The Hegemony of Whiteness]. Stockholm: Tankekraft Förlag.
  2. ―, & Paulina De los Reyes, 2011. Postkolonial feminism 1. [Postcolonial Feminism 1.]. Stockholm: Tankekraft.
  3. Ang, Ien & Paulina De los Reyes, 2012. Postkolonial feminism 2. [Postcolonial Feminism 2.]. Stockholm: Tankekraft.
  4. Crenshaw, Kimberlé, 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1: 139-167.
  5. Davies, Margaret, [1994]2008. Asking the Law Question. Sydney: Lawbook.
  6. De los Reyes, Paulina, Irene Molina & Diana Mulinari, 2002. Maktens (o)lika förklädnader: kön, klass & etnicitet i det postkoloniala Sverige: en festskrift till Wuokko Knocke. [The Domination of (Un)Similar Disguise: Gender, Class & Ethnicity in the Postcolonial Sweden: A Miscellany in Honour of Wuokko Knocke]. Stockholm: Atlas.
  7. Grabham, Emily, 2009. Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
  8. Hertogh, M. 2009. Living Law: Reconsidering Eugen Ehrlich. Oxford: Hart.
  9. Kantola, Johanna, & Kevät Nousiainen, 2009. Institutionalizing Intersectionality in Europe. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11, 4: 459-477.
  10. King, Debora, 1988. Multiple Jeopardy. Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology. Signs, 14,1: 42-72.
  11. Matsuda, Mari, 1990. Beside my Sister, Facing the Enemy: Legal Theory out of Coalition. Stanford law Review, 14: 1183-1192.
  12. ―, 1987. Looking to the Bottom: Critical Legal Studies and Reparations. Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review, 22: 323-399.
  13. McCall, Leslie, 2005. Intersektionalitetens komplexitet. [The Complexity of Intersectionality]. Tidskrift för genusvetenskap, 26, 2/3: 31-56.
  14. Miles, Robert, 1993. Racism After “Race Relations”. London: Routledge.
  15. Minow, Martha 1990. Making all the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca: Cornell Un. Press.
  16. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, 2006. Feminism utan gränser: avkoloniserad teori, praktiserad solidaritet [Feminism without Borders]. Stockholm: Tankekraft.
  17. Molina, Irene, 2004. Intersubjektivitet och intersektionalitet för en subversiv antirasistisk feminism [Intersubjectivism and Intersectionality Towards a Subversive Antiracist Feminism]. Sociologisk forskning, 3: 19-24.
  18. Schömer, Eva, 2008. Rätten att säga det som tänks eller mänskliga rättigheter i ett intersektionellt perspektiv [The Right to Say What is Thought or Human Rights in an Intersectional Perspective]. In Annika Staaf & Lars Zanderin (red.), Mänskliga rättigheter i svensk belysning. Malmö: Liber förlag.
  19. ―, 2012. Multiple Discrimination. A Smokescreen over Differences. Retfærd, 138, 3: 29-50.
  20. ―, 2014. Etnisk diskriminering, en rättslig paradox [Etnical Discrimination a Legal Paradox]. In Lotti Ryberg-Welander (red.), Festskrift till Catharina Calleman: I rättens utkanter. Uppsala: Iustus.
  21. ―, 2016. Sweden - a Society of Covert Racism. Equal from the Outside: Everyday Racism and Ethnic Discrimination in Swedish Society. Oñati Socio-Legal Series.
  22. Williams, Patricia J., 1991. The Alchemy of Race and Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Eva Schoemer, Multiple discrimination at work: Gaining entry to the Swedish workforce in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 2/2016, pp. 117-138, DOI:10.3280/SD2016-002008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content