Clicca qui per scaricare

Sustainable development as an opportunity for innovation in the management model of public organisations
Titolo Rivista: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 
Autori/Curatori: José Aureliano Martín-Segura, José Luis Navarro-Espigares, César Pérez-López, Guillermo Maraver-Tarifa 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2015 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  27 P. 19-45 Dimensione file:  1491 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EFE2015-003002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The literature recognises the great influence that environmental spending exerts on implementing LA21. But some authors raise doubts about the firm commitment of local government. Thus the main objective of this paper is to verify the authenticity of political commitment towards meeting the objectives of sustainable development by means of the budgetary support to these policies. To accomplish this verification, we apply the Difference in Differences technique for the period 2002-2012 in the Spanish municipalities. Results obtained confirmed the initial hypothesis and show that local governments that adhered to LA21 increased their environmental expenses to a greater degree.


Keywords: Local Agenda 21, environmental expenses, difference in differences.
Jel Code: H76, H72, Q58, C21, C33

  1. Adolfsson S. (2002). Local Agenda 21 in Four Swedish Municipalities: A Tool towards Sustainability? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45 (2): 219-244., DOI: 10.1080/09640560220116314
  2. Aguado I. and Echebarría C. (2004). El gasto medioambiental en las Comunidades Autónomas y su relación con la Agenda Local 21: estudio mediante el empleo del análisis de correspondencias. Estudios Geográficos, 65 (255): 195-228.
  3. Angrist J.D. and Pischke J. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princenton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8769.html.
  4. Barbier E.B. (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation, 14 (2): 101-110.
  5. Brunet Estarellas P.J., Almeida García F. and Coll López M. (2005). Agenda 21: Subsidiariedad y Cooperación a favor del Desarrollo Territorial Sostenible. Boletín de La Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles, 39: 423-446.
  6. Cardozo Brum M. (2013). Políticas públicas: los debates de su análisis y evaluación. Andamios, 10 (21): 39-59.
  7. Cole R.J. and Valdebenito M.J. (2013). The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED. Building Research & Information, 41 (6): 662-676., DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.802115
  8. Curran G. (2015). Political modernisation for ecologically sustainable development in Australia. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 22 (1): 7-20., DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2014.999359
  9. Devuyst D. (1999). Sustainability assessment: the application of a methodological framework. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 1 (4): 459-487., DOI: 10.1142/S1464333299000351
  10. Dobbin F., Sutton J.R., Meyer J.W. and Scott R. (1993). Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets. American Journal of Sociology, 99 (2): 396-427., DOI: 10.1086/230269
  11. Doner R.F., Ritchie B.K. and Slater D. (2005). Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective. International Organization, 59 (2)., DOI: 10.1017/S0020818305050113
  12. Doner R.F. (2010). Explaining Institutional Innovation. Social Science Research Council. Retrieved from -- https://s3.amazonaws.com/ssrc-cdn1/crmuploads/new_publication_3/7B4356D6C4-99DB-DF11-A822-001CC477EC84%7D.pdf.
  13. Durán C. (2004). Evaluación microeconométrica de las políticas públicas de empleo: aspectos metodológicos. Hacienda Pública Española, 170: 107-136.
  14. Echebarria C., Barrutia J.M. and Aguado I. (2004). Local Agenda 21: Progress in Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11 (3): 273-281., DOI: 10.1177/0969776404041490
  15. Eckerberg K. and Forsberg B. (1998). Implementing agenda 21 in local government: The Swedish experience. Local Environment, 3 (3): 333-347., DOI: 10.1080/13549839808725569
  16. European Sustainable Cities Platform – AALBORG +10 2004. (n.d.). Retrieved 24 March 2016, --from http://www.sustainablecities.eu/events/aalborg-10-2004/.
  17. Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias-FEMP, & Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España-OSE (Eds.) (2013). 20 años de Políticas Locales de Desarrollo Sostenible en España. Madrid: Federación Española de Municipios y Provincias (FEMP).
  18. Foh Lee K. (2001). Sustainable tourism destinations: the importance of cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9: 313-323., DOI: 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00071-8
  19. Font N. and Subirats J. (2000). Local y sostenible: la Agenda 21 Local en España. Icaria Editorial.
  20. Gertler P.J., Martinez S., Premand P., Rawlings L.B. and Vermeersch C.M.J. (2011). Impact Evaluation in Practice. World Bank. Retrieved --from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2550.
  21. Haapio A. and Viitaniemi P. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28 (7): 469-482.
  22. Hanifah N.A., Shah R.M. and Hashim R. (2012). Impact of Human Activities in Antarctica: Dissecting the Concepts of Ecologically Sustainable Development and Natural Reserve for Peace and Science. APCBEE Procedia, 1: 177-181.
  23. Hernández Aja A. (2003). Informe sobre los indicadores locales de sostenibilidad utilizados por los municipios españoles firmantes de la Carta de Aalborg. Retrieved --from http://www.medioambientecantabria.es/documentos_contenidos/14940_1.511.pdf.
  24. Hess D. and Winner L. (2007). Enhancing Justice and Sustainability at the Local Level: Affordable Policies for Urban Governments. Local Environment, 12 (4): 379-395., DOI: 10.1080/13549830701412489
  25. Hidalgo L.A. (2008). La implantación de la Agenda 21 Local en las diferentes Comunidades Autónomas: Orígenes, evolución y valoración global del proceso. Revista de Fomento Social, 250: 233-274.
  26. Hoff K. and Stiglitz J.E. (2000). Modern economic theory and development. In Meier G.M. and Stiglitz J.E. (Eds.), Frontiers of development economics: The future in perspective (pp. 389-485). Washington, D.C.: World Bank/Oxford University Press.
  27. Jiménez Herrero L.M. (2008). Sostenibilidad local: una aproximación urbana y rural. Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España. Retrieved --from http://www.magrama.gob.es/en/ceneam/recursos/materiales/sostenibilidad-local.aspx.
  28. Koutrakou V.N. (2004). Contemporary Issues and Debates in EU Policy: The European Union and International Relations. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  29. Lafferty W.M. and Eckerberg K. (2013). From the Earth Summit to Local Agenda 21: Working Towards Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
  30. Lawrence D.P. (1997). PROFILE: Integrating Sustainability and Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Management, 21 (1): 23-42.
  31. Lélé S.M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19 (6): 607-621., DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
  32. Llamas Sánchez R. (2005). Un análisis institucional de la implantación de la Agenda Local 21 por los ayuntamientos españoles. Granada: University of Granada.
  33. Llamas-Sanchez R., Garcia-Morales V. and Martin-Tapia I. (2013). Factors affecting institutional change: a study of the adoption of Local Agenda 21 in Spain. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26 (6): 1045-1070., DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-03-2012-0037
  34. Macintosh A. (2015). The impact of ESD on Australia’s environmental institutions. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 22 (1): 33-45., DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2014.999724
  35. Martínez M. and Rosende S. (2011). Participación ciudadana en las agendas 21 locales: cuestiones críticas de la gobernanza urbana. Scripta Nova: Revista Electrónica de Geografía Y Ciencias Sociales, 15: 348-386.
  36. Mason M. (2012). Environmental Democracy. Earthscan.
  37. Mebratu D. (1998). Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18 (6): 493-520., DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
  38. Moralejo I.A., Legarreta J.M.B. and Miguel C.E. (2007). La Agenda 21 Local en España. Ekonomiaz: Revista Vasca de Economía, 64: 174-213.
  39. Morra Imas L.G. and Rist R.C. (2009). The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2699.
  40. Nijkamp P. and Pepping G. (1998). A Meta-analytical Evaluation of Sustainable City Initiatives. Urban Studies, 35 (9): 1481-1500., DOI: 10.1080/0042098984240
  41. Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad (2014). Informe Sostenibilidad en España 2014. Retrieved --from http://www.observatoriosostenibilidad.com/sostenibilidad-en-espana-2014/.
  42. Papadopoulos A.M. and Giama E. (2009). Rating systems for counting buildings’ environmental performance. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 28 (1-3): 29-43., DOI: 10.1080/14786450802452423
  43. Poveda C.A. and Lipsett M. (2011). A Review of Sustainability Assessment and Sustainability/Environmental Rating Systems and Credit Weighting Tools. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4 (6): 36.
  44. Rutherfoord R., Blackburn A. and Spence L.J. (2000). Environmental management and the small firm. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 6 (6): 310-326., DOI: 10.1108/13552550010362750
  45. Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future (2012). Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles. Retrieved from http://www.stakeholderforum.org/index.php/our-publications-sp-1224407103/reports-in-our-publications/410-undesa-synthesis-review-of-agenda-21-and-the-rio-principles.
  46. Thomas I.G. (2010). Environmental policy and local government in Australia. Local Environment, 15 (2): 121-136., DOI: 10.1080/13549830903527647
  47. Valentin A., Spangenberg J.H. (2000). A guide to community sustainability indicators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20 (3): 381-392., DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00049-4
  48. Villa J. (2012). Simplifying the estimation of difference in differences treatment effects with Stata (MPRA Paper). University Library of Munich, Germany. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pramprapa/43943.htm.
  49. WCED (1987). Our Common Future. London: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/our-common-future-97801928

José Aureliano Martín-Segura, José Luis Navarro-Espigares, César Pérez-López, Guillermo Maraver-Tarifa, in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 3/2015, pp. 19-45, DOI:10.3280/EFE2015-003002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche