Click here to download

Post-disaster reconstruction in Constitución, Chile
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Author/s: Davide Olori 
Year:  2016 Issue: 111 Language: English 
Pages:  19 Pg. 45-63 FullText PDF:  587 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2016-111003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The post-disaster reconstruction of territories hit by an environmental disaster further stresses the existing social polarizations and the latent conflicts within the areas where the event takes place. Through a chilean case study, we hypothesize that the investigation of the ways social actors move across the city allows us to understand how people return to "normality" when forced to re-organize their lives in the post-disaster phase.
Keywords: Reconstruccion, vulnerability, disaster, Constitución, socio-spatial dynamics, social inequality.

  1. Bazzucchi A. (2010). I costi della città dispersa: prime evidenze. In E. Minardi, R. Salvatore, O.R.eS.Te. Osservare, comprendere e progettare per ricostruire a partre dal terremoto dell’Aquila. Teramo: HomeLess Book.
  2. Bolin B. (2007). Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Disaster Vulnerability. In E.D. Quarantelli, Handbook of disaster research. New York, NY: Springer.
  3. Cociña Varas C., Boano C. (2013). Housing and Reconstruction in Chile (2010-2012) Institutional and social transformation in post-disaster contexts. International Journal of Architectural Research, 7(3): 57-59.
  4. Cutter S. (1995). Race, class, and environmental justice. Progress in Human Geography, 19: 107–118., 10.1177/03091325950190011DOI: 10.1177/03091325950190011
  5. Dash N., Morrow B., Mainster J., Cunningham L. (2007). Lasting Effects of Hurricane Andrew on a Working-Class Community. Natural Hazards 8:1(13), 13-21. , 8(13), 13-21., 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:1(13DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:1(13
  6. Del Carmen-Contreras Y., Beltràn-Benitez M. (2015, 5). Reconstruire con capacidad de resiliencia: el casco historico de la ciudad de Constituciòn y el sitio del desastre del terremoto y tsunami del 27 de febrero 2010. Invi, 83(30), 79-115., 10.4067/S0718-8358201500010000DOI: 10.4067/S0718-8358201500010000
  7. Elliott J., Pais J. (2010). When Nature Pushes Back: Environmental Impact and the Spatial Redistribution of Socially Vulnerable Populations. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5): 1187-1202.
  8. Fothergill A., Maestas E.G., Darlington J.D. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2): 156–173., 10.1111/1467-7717.0011DOI: 10.1111/1467-7717.0011
  9. Fox Gotham K. (2016). Re-anchoring capital in disaster- devastated spaces: Financialisation and the Gulf Opportunity (GO) Zone programme. Urban Studies, 53(7): 1362–1383., 10.1177/004209801454811DOI: 10.1177/004209801454811
  10. Gotham F., Greenberg M. (2015). Crisis Cities. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Hewitt K. (1983). Interpretation of Calamity from the perspective of human ecology. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
  12. IDMC. (2015). Global Estimates 2015 People displaced by disasters. Norwegian Refugee Council, Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. Ginevra: Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre.
  13. International Labour Office (2010). Informe de Anàlisis Economico y Social. Subregional Office for the Southern Cone of Latino America, Fundacion Instituto de Estudios Laborales. Santiago de Chile: ILO.
  14. King L., McCarthy D. (2005). Environmental sociology: From analysis to action. New York, NY: Rowman-Littlefield.
  15. Letelier F. (2013). Guía para el fortalecimiento del Territorio. Talca: CEUT-Surmaule-UCM.
  16. Letelier F., Boyco P. (2011). Talca posterremoto: una ciudad en disputa. Talca: SUR.
  17. MINVU. (2010). Chile Unido Reconstruye Mejor. Gobierno de Chile, Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo. Santiago: Gobierno de Chile.
  18. Moore H. (1958). Tornadoes over texas. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  19. ONU (2010). Terremoto. Informe situacion n. 19. ONU, Oficina Coordinador Residente Chile. Santiago de Chile: ONU.
  20. Oszlack O. (1991). Merecer la ciudad: los pobres y el derecho al espacio urbano. Buenos Aires: CEDES-Humanitas.
  21. Pellow D., Weinberg A., Schnaiberg A. (2005). The environmental justice movement: Equitable allocation of the costs and benefits of environmental management outcomes. In L.M. King, Environmental sociology: From analysis to action. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
  22. Renna H. (2011). Siete y Cuatro. El retorno de los pobladores. Lucha por la vivienda, autogestión habitacional y poder popular en Santiago de Chile. Santiago de Chile: Quimantù.
  23. Rodríguez A., Sugranyes A. (2005). Los con techo. Un desafio para la vivienda social. Santiago de Chile: SUR.
  24. Stallings R. (2002). Weberian Political Sociology and Sociological Disaster Studies. Sociological Forum, 17(2): 281-305., 10.1023/A:101604131404DOI: 10.1023/A:101604131404
  25. Tapia Z.R. (2014). Terremoto 2010, Chile: Evaluación de la aplicación de normativa urbana/rural en políticas públicas. Algunos resultados. In C. Catalina-Arteaga, R. Tapia-Zarricueta, Vulnerabilidades y desastres socionaturales: experiencias recientes en Chile. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.
  26. Tiefenbacher J., Hagelman R. (1999). Environmental equity in urban Texas: Race, income, and patterns of acute and chronic toxic air releases in metropolitan counties. Urban Geography, 20: 516–533., 10.2747/0272-3638.20.6.51DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.20.6.51
  27. Tierney K.J. (2007). From to the margins to the mainstream: disaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 502-525.
  28. Yang J., Yi H. (2014). Research trends of post disaster reconstruction: The past and the future. Habitat International, 42: 21-29.

Davide Olori, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 111/2016, pp. 45-63, DOI:10.3280/SUR2016-111003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content