Click here to download

Towards an online approach to university public engagement: An exploratory analysis of website content
Journal Title: MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ 
Author/s: Vittoria Marino, Letizia Lo Presti 
Year:  2017 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  24 Pg. 75-98 FullText PDF:  487 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MC2017-002005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Public engagement has been the focus of great attention of universities, ever since a strong social orientation has driven these institutions to open up more towards their territories and to assume an active and propulsive role in their development. In this context, web sites constitute a valid instrument for the valorisation and permeability of generated knowledge by making scientific research visible and comprehensible and thus enhancing its image and loyalty towards its stakeholders. This present work investigates the construct of online public engagement in the university ambit through an analysis of institutional websites taken from a sample of 86 Anglo-Saxon universities that have already developed a greater sense of awareness on this subject. This work contributes to the investigation of the approaches that universities are using to give online visibility to the activity of public engagement, outlining differences in the managerial approaches to public engagement in both public and private sectors.
Keywords: Public engagement, Higher Education, Web site, Public university, Private university, Web communication

  1. Aquilani B., Lovari A. (2008). The “new season” of University Communication between institutionalization processes and strategic target relationships: an empirical analysis of internet web sites of Italiana universities. In: Invernizzi E., Muzi Falconi T., Romenti S. (a cura di), Instituzionalising pr and corporate communication, 2: 1132-1220. Milano: Pearson.
  2. Arrazattee C.K., Lima M., Lundy L. (2013). Do University Communications about Campus-Community Partnerships Reflect Core Engagement Principles?. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 20(1): 41-53.
  3. Bairamzadeh S., Bolhari A. (2010). Investigating factors affecting students’ satisfaction of university websites. In: Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT), 2010 3rd IEEE International Conference on Vol. 1: 469-473. IEEE.
  4. Baker D. (2004). The scholarship of engagement: A taxonomy of five emerging practices. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 9(2): 123-137.
  5. Bandelli A. and Konijn E.A. (2012). Science Centers and Public Partecipation: Methods, Strategies, and Barriers. Science Communication, 35(4): 419-448,, 10.1177/1075547012458910DOI: 10.1177/1075547012458910
  6. Boyer E.L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7):18-33,, 10.2307/3824459DOI: 10.2307/3824459
  7. Britner P. A. (2012). Bringing Public Engagement into an Academic Plan and Its Assessment Metrics. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(4): 61-77.
  8. Bruns K., Fitzgerald H.E., Furco A., Sonka S., Swanson L. (2011). Centrality of engagement in higher education. White Paper. Council on Engagement and Outreach, Association of Public and Land Grant Universities. --Testo disponibile al sito: — http://pumr.pascalobservatory.org/.
  9. Cavallo T., Romenti S. (2012). Università italiane e territorio: analisi di statuti e siti internet in ottica di community relations e civic engagement, In: Conference Proceedings-Sinergie XXIV Annual Conference, Ottobre 18-19, Lecce.
  10. Chaeplo C., Carrillo Duràn M.V., Castillo Diaz A. (2011). Do UK universities communicate their brands effectively through their websites?. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1): 25-46,, 10.1080/08841241.2011.569589DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2011.569589
  11. Davies S. (2013a). Constituting Public Engagement: Meanings and Genealogies of PEST in Two U.K. Studies. Science Communication 35(6): 687-707,, 10.1177/1075547013478203DOI: 10.1177/1075547013478203
  12. Davies S. (2013b). Research staff and public engagement: a UK study. Higher Education 66(6): 725-739,
  13. Esfijani A., Hussain F., Chang E. University social responsibility ontology. Engineering Intelligent Systems, 4: 271-281.
  14. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdoff L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2): 109-123,, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  15. Furco A. (2010). The engaged campus: Toward a comprehensive approach to public engagement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(4): 375-390,, 10.1080/00071005.2010.527656DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2010.527656
  16. Gordon J., Berhow S. (2009). University websites and dialogic features for building relationships with potential students. Public Relations Review, 35(2): 150-152,
  17. Hant A., Northmore S., Gerhardt C. (2009). Briefing paper: Auditing, benchmarking and evaluating public engagement. NCCPE Research Synthesis, 1, Bristol. Testo disponibile al sito: — https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk (ultimo accesso 10/02/2016).
  18. Hart A., Northmore S., Gerhardt C. (2010). Summary: Auditing, Benchmarking and Evaluating Public engagement, NCCPE Briefing Series, 1, Bristol. --Testo disponibile al sito — www.public engagement.ac.uk (ultimo accesso 10/02/2016).
  19. Hant A., Northmore S. (2011). Auditing and Evaluating University-Community Engagement: Lessons from a UK Case Study. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1): 34-58,
  20. Holland B.A. (2001). Exploring the challenge of documenting and measuring civic engagement endeavors of colleges and universities: purposes, Issues, Ideas. Articolo presentato al Campus Compact, Advanced Institute on Classifications For Civic Engagement, 23 Marzo 2001. --Testo disponibile al sito: — http://www.compact.org/advancedtoolkit/pdf/holland_paper.pdf (ultimo accesso 02/03/2016).
  21. Jacob J.W., Sutin S.E., Weidman J.C., Yeager J.L. (2015). Community in Higher Education: International and Local Perspectives. In: Jacob J.W., Sutin S.E., Weidman J.C., Yeager J.L. (eds). Community Engagement in Higher Education: Policy reforms and practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 1-28.
  22. Marginson S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53(1): 307-333,
  23. Men L.R. and Tsai W.S. (2013). Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review, 39: 13-22,
  24. National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement (2010). The engaged university. A manifesto for public engagement. --Testo disponibile sul sito: — www.public engagement.ac.uk. (ultimo accesso 8/01/2016).
  25. Nejati M., Shafaei A., Salamzadeh Y., Daraei M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and universities: A study of top 10 world universities’ websites, African Journal of Business Management, 5(2): 440-447.
  26. Polillo R. (2013). Il check up dei siti web delle organizzazioni non profit, I. Visciola Quaderni di THINK! n. 3
  27. Polillo R. (2005). Un modello di qualità per i siti web.Mondo Digitale, Giugno, 2: 32-44, Associazione Italiana per l’Informatica e il Calcolo Automatico (AICA).
  28. Poliakoff E., Webb T.L. (2007). What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities?. Science communication, 29(2): 242-263,, 10.1177/107554700730800DOI: 10.1177/107554700730800
  29. Pumpin C. (1999). Strategie per le imprese dinamiche. Torino: Isedi.
  30. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, technology & human values, 30(2): 251-290,, 10.1177/0162243904271724DOI: 10.1177/0162243904271724
  31. Schimmel K., Montley D., Racic S., Marco G., Eschenfelder M. (2010). The importance of university web pages in selecting a higher education institution. Research in Higher Education Journal, 9(1): 1-16.
  32. Schulze H.J. (2012). Universities and their communities – Engagement and service as primary mission. In: McIlrath L., Lyons A., Munck R. (Eds.). Higher Education and Civic Engagement: Comparative Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 61-77.
  33. Smith K.M., Fabienne E., Crookes P.A. (2014). Engagement and academic promotion: a review of the literature. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4): 836-847,, 10.1080/07294360.2013.863849DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2013.863849
  34. Stephenson Jr. (2011). Conceiving land grant university community engagement as adaptive leadership. Higher Education, 61(1): 95-108,
  35. Tang J.J., Maroothynaden J., Bello F., Kneebone R. (2013). Public Engagement Through Shared Immersion: Participating in the Processes of Research, Science Communication, 35(5): 654-666,, 10.1177/1075547012466389DOI: 10.1177/1075547012466389
  36. Vargiu A. (2014). Indicators for the Evaluation of Public Engagement of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5: 562-584,
  37. Visciola M. (2000). Usabilità dei siti web. Milano: Apogeo.
  38. Wilkinson C., Bultitude K. and Dawson E. (2010). Oh yes, robots! People like robots; the robot people should do something: perspectives and prospects in public engagement with robotics. Science Communication, 33(3): 367-397,, 10.1177/1075547010389818DOI: 10.1177/1075547010389818

Vittoria Marino, Letizia Lo Presti, in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 2/2017, pp. 75-98, DOI:10.3280/MC2017-002005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content