Clicca qui per scaricare

Promuovere social innovation attraverso la definizione partecipata dei bisogni di salute
Titolo Rivista: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Autori/Curatori: Silvia Cervia 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2017 Fascicolo: 3-Suppl. Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  17 P. 101-117 Dimensione file:  108 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2017-SU3007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Although the success of social innovation relies on civic participation and involvement in a vast array of interests, it is far from clear under what conditions this engagement is capable to impact positively on constituent dimensions of social innovation. In line with international literature we identify these dimensions in the content dimension, related to the satisfaction of unmet needs, in the process dimension, as changes in social relations especially with regard to governance, and, finally, in the empowerment dimension, linked to the increase in the socio-political capability and access to resources. The article suggests an interpretation of citizens’ engagement as a driver of social innovation in the broader contest of network governance. This approach allows us to identify a number of structural elements that are able to make participation a growth driver for social innovation, and that are linked to the logic of consequences and the logic of appropriateness.


Keywords: Social innovation; sistema sanitario; governance collaborativa; partecipazione; logica dell'appropriatezza; logica delle conseguenze.

  1. Alcock P. (2015). Editoriale. Salute e Società, 1: 11-15., 10.3280/SES2015-00100DOI: 10.3280/SES2015-00100
  2. Altieri L. (2004). La partecipazione alla salute. In: Cipolla C., a cura di, Manuale di sociologia della salute. Vol. I. Teoria. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Altieri L. (2009). Valutazione e Partecipazione. Metodologia per una ricerca interattiva e negoziale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  4. Anderson T., Curtis A.A., Wittig C. (2014). Definition and Theory in Social Innovation. Krems: Danube University.
  5. Ansell C., Gash A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 543-571.
  6. Arnstein S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216-224., 10.1080/0194436690897722DOI: 10.1080/0194436690897722
  7. Batson V. (2004). Shared governance in an integrated health care network. Association of Operating Room Nurses, 80(3): 493-514.
  8. Bekkers V., Edelenbos J., Steijn B. (2011). An Innovative Public Sector? Embarking on the Innovation Journey. In: Bekkers V., Edelenbos J., Steijn B., editors, Innovation in the public sector: linking capacity and leadership. Houndsmills: Palgrave McMillan.
  9. Bekkers V., Tummers L., Stuijfzand B.G., Voorberg W. (2013). Social innovation in the public sector: An integrative framework. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  10. Benoît L. (2013). Social innovation in governance and public management system: toward a new paradigm?. In: Moulaert F., Maccallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A., editors, International handbook of social innovation. Social Innovation, Collective Action and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  11. Bommert B. (2010). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1): 15-33.
  12. Canale L. (2013). Unione Europea, Innovazione Sociale e Secondo Welfare. WP-2WEL, 1: 1-20.
  13. Caulier-Grice J., Davies A., Patrick R., Norman W. (2012). Defining social innovation. TEPSIE, European Commission. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
  14. Cervia S. (2014). La partecipazione dei cittadini in Sanità. Italia ed Europa a confronto. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  15. Dolhinow R. (2010). A Jumble of Needs: Women’s Activism and Neoliberalism in the Colonias of the Southwest. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
  16. EC (2013). Social innovation research in the European Union. Approaches, findings and future directions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  17. Eggers W.D., Singh S.K. (2009). The Public Innovators Playbook. Washington, DC: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
  18. Ferlie E. et al. (2010). Networks in Health Care: a Comparative Study of Their Management, Impact and Performance. London: HMSO.
  19. Gerometta J., Haussermann H., Longo G. (2005). Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: Strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies, 42(11): 2007-2021.
  20. Hartley J. (2005). Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1): 27-34.
  21. Hartley J., Sørensen E., Torfing J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73 (6): 821-830.
  22. Hoeijmakers M., Kenis P., de Leeuw E., de Vries N.K. (2007). Local health policy development processes. An expanded toolbox. Health Promotion International, 22(2): 112-21.
  23. Howaldt J., Schwarz M. (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Aachen: IMA/ZLW Aachen IfU.
  24. Howaldt J., Domanski D., Kaletka C. (2016). Social Innovation: Towards a new Innovation Paradigm. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6): 20-44.
  25. Lewis J. (2010). Connecting and cooperating: social capital and public policy. Sydney: UNSW Press.
  26. Lewis J., Coinsidine M., Alexander D. (2011). Innovation Inside Government: The Importance of Networks. In: Bekkers V., Edelenbos J., Steijn B., editors, Innovation in the public sector: linking capacity and leadership. Houndsmills: Pal-grave McMillan.
  27. Marafioti E., Mariani L., Martini M. (2014). Exploring the Effect of Network Governance Models on Health-Care Systems Performance. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(13): 987-998., 10.1080/01900692.2014.94499DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2014.94499
  28. March J.G., Olsen J.P. (1992). Riscoprire le istituzioni. Bologna: Il Mulino (ed. or. Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York/London, 1989).
  29. March J.G., Olsen J.P. (2011). The logic of Appropriateness. In: Rein M., Moran M., Goodin R.E., editors, The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.
  30. Martinelli F. (2013). Learning from case studies of social innovation in the field of social services: creatively balancing top-down universalism with bottom-up democracy. In: Moulaert F., Maccallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A., International handbook of social innovation. Social Innovation, Collective Action and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  31. Massey A., Johnston-Miller K. (2016). Governance: public governance to social innovation? Policy & Politics, 44(4): 663-675.
  32. Mendes A., Batista A., Fernandes L., Macedo P., Pinto F., Rebelo L., Ribeiro M., Ribeiro R., Sottomayor M., Tavares M., Verdelho V. (2012). Barriers to Social Innovation. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
  33. Miquel M.P., Cabeza M.G., Anglada S.E. (2013). Theorizing multi-level governance in social innovation dynamics. In: Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A., editors, The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  34. Moulaert F., Maccallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A. (2013). International handbook of social innovation. Social Innovation, Collective Action and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  35. Mulgan J. (2009). The Art of Public Strategy. Oxford: OUP.
  36. Newman J. (2001). Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society. London: Sage.
  37. Osborne S.P., Brown L. (2011). Innovation in public services: Engaging with risk. Public Money & Management, 31(1): 4-6., 10.1080/09540962.2011.54553DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2011.54553
  38. Perri 6, Goodwin N., Peck E. and Freeman T. (2006). Managing Networks of Twenty First Century Organisations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Pollitt C., Hupe P. (2011). Talking about Government: The Role of Magic Concepts. Public Management Review, 89(1): 114-127.
  40. Prahalad C., Ramaswamy V. (2004). Co-Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3): 5-14.
  41. Provan K.G., Kenis P.N. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2): 229-252.
  42. Roberts N.C., King P.J. (1996). Transforming Public Policy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  43. Sørensen E., Torfing J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8): 842-868., 10.1177/009539971-141876DOI: 10.1177/009539971-141876
  44. Swyngedouw E. (2004). Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42(11): 1991–2006.
  45. Swyngedouw E. (2009). Civil society, governmentality and the contradictions of governance-beyond-the-state: The janus-face of social innovation. In: Mac-Callum D., Moulaert F., Hillier J., Haddock V.S., editors, Social Innovation and Territorial Development|Soc. Innovation and Territorial Development. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  46. Von Hippel E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  47. Von Hippel E. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks – by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2): 1-23.
  48. Voorberg W., Bekkers V., Tummers L. (2014). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9): 1333-1357., 10.1080/14719037.2014.93050DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.93050
  49. Voorberg W., Bekkers V., Timeus K., Tonurist P., Tummers L. (2017). Changing public service delivery: learning in co-creation. Policy and Society, 36(2): 178-194., 10.1080/14494035.2017.132371DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2017.132371

Silvia Cervia, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3-Suppl./2017, pp. 101-117, DOI:10.3280/SES2017-SU3007

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche