Click here to download

Italian planning and fiscal tools for land value recapture: a historical review
Journal Title: ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI 
Author/s: Enzo Falco, Alessandro Boca 
Year:  2017 Issue: 120 Language: Italian 
Pages:  22 Pg. 99-120 FullText PDF:  119 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ASUR2017-120005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The paper offers a historical review of planning and fiscal measures introduced in Italy regarding the question of betterment value. Every spatial intervention causes an impact on the land and on its value, and the ability of public authorities to regulate the matter becomes therefore important for both planning practice and civil society. By means of betterment value recapture, in fact, local authorities can make private actors contribute to the realization and maintenance of the urban public space.
Keywords: Land value recapture; urban planning; tax system; equalisation; betterment value

  1. Alterman R. (2009). Can the “unearned increment” in land values be harnessed to supply affordable housing? Paper Presented at UN Habitat Warsaw Conferen-ce”. Testo disponibile al sito: http://alterman2.technion.ac.il/files/conference_papers/UN_HABITAT.pdf (ultimo accesso: 24 gennaio 2015).
  2. Bernoulli H. (1946). Die Stadt und her Boden. Towns and the Land. Erlenbach-Zürich: Verlag für Architektur.
  3. Bowers J. (1992). The Economics of Planning Gain: a re-appraisal. Urban Studies, 8: 1329-1339.
  4. Camagni R. (2011). L’uso improprio della perequazione urbanistica: il caso del PGT di Milano. EyesREG. Giornale di Scienze Regionali, 1(1).
  5. Camagni R. (2015). Perequazione urbanistica estesa: riflessioni e valutazioni due anni dopo. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 114: 164-165.
  6. Camarda D. (1999). Public Consensus and Planners’ Expertise. A twofold problem for Italian planning law. Town Planning Review, 70(1): 25-39., 10.1177/153851321561528DOI: 10.1177/153851321561528
  7. Campos Venuti G. (1967). Amministrare l’urbanistica. Torino: Einaudi.
  8. Casini L. (2011). Equalisation and Compensation Mechanisms in the new Rome Urban Development Plan. Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 1(1): 33-45.
  9. Chiodelli F. (2016). Equal treatment in land use planning: investigating the ethics of the transfer of development rights. Scienze Regionali, 1: 121-138., 10.3280/SCRE2016-00100DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-00100
  10. Chiodelli F. and Moroni, S. (2016). Zoning-integrative and zoning-alternative transferable development rights: Compensation, equity, efficiency. Land Use Policy, 52: 422-429.
  11. Codecasa G. e Garda E. (2011). Il “ciclo di vita” dei diritti edificatori: strumenti e dispositivi per il governo delle densità urbane. Paper presentato al Workshop: Il trasferimento dei diritti edificatori: potenzialità, problemi, prospettive, DiAP-Politecnico di Milano, Milano, 8 giugno.
  12. De Lucia V., Salzano E. e Strobbe F. (1973). Riforma urbanistica 73. Roma: Edizioni delle autonomie.
  13. Dowdall H.C. (1910). The Growth of Legal Control over Town Development In England. The Town Planning Review, 1(3):212-220., 10.1177/153851321561528DOI: 10.1177/153851321561528
  14. Eyrand L. (2014). Reforming Capital Taxation in Italy. IMF Working Paper 14/6. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1406.pdf (ultimo accesso: 26 luglio 2015).
  15. Fried R.C. (1973). Planning the Eternal City: Roman Politics and Planning since World War II. Yale: Yale University Press.
  16. George H. (1879). Progress and poverty: An inquiry into the cause of industrial depressions and of increase of want with increase of wealth; The remedy. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Testo disponibile al sito: https://mises.org/sites/default/files/Progress%20and%20Poverty_3.pdf (ultimo accesso: 17 marzo 2015).
  17. Healey P., Purdue M. and Ennis F. (1995). Negotiating Development: Rationales and Practice for Development Obligations and Planning Gain. London: E & FN Spon.
  18. Johnston R.A. and Madison M.E. (1997). From Landmarks to Landscapes. A Re-view of Current Practice in the Transfer of Development Rights. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3): 365-378.
  19. Magnani I. e Muraro G. (1978). Edilizia e sviluppo urbano. Bologna: il Mulino.
  20. Marongiu G. (2001). Storia dei tributi degli Enti Locali 1861-2000. Padova: Cedam.
  21. Micelli E. (2012). La gestione dei piani urbanistici: Perequazione, accordi, incentivi. Venezia: Marsilio Editori.
  22. Micelli E. (2015). La cattura dei plusvalori esito delle scelte urbanistiche: tassazione vs strumenti di partenariato. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 114: 166-173.
  23. Micelli E. (2016). I diritti edificatori per il governo del territorio: strumento generalizzato o tecnica di nicchia? Scienze Regionali, 15(1), 127-133.
  24. Mill J.S. (1848). The Principles of Political Economy. Kitchener: Batoche Books. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/30107/30107-pdf.pdf (ultimo accesso: 25 luglio 2015).
  25. Moroni S. (2015) Perequazione e trasferibilità dei diritti edificatori: due prospettive differenti. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 114: 174-181.
  26. Oliva F. (2010). Città senza cultura. Intervista sull’urbanistica. Bari: Laterza.
  27. Peterson G.E. (2009). Unlocking Land Value to Finance Urban Infrastructure. Washington: The World Bank – PPIAF.
  28. Piccinato G. (2010), A brief history of Italian town planning after 1945. Town Planning Review, 81 (3): 237-259.
  29. Pittori P. e Stella Richter P. (1996). Codice dell’Urbanistica. Roma: Edizioni Kappa.
  30. Pizor J.P. (1986). Making TDR Work: A Study of Program Implementation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52(2): 203-211.
  31. Pompei S. (1998). Il Piano regolatore perequativo. Aspetti strutturali, strategici e operativi. Milano: Hoepli.
  32. Pruetz R. and Standridge N. (2009). What Makes Transfer of Development Rights Work?: Success Factors From Research and Practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1): 78-87.
  33. Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. and Pavoncello F. (1983). Explaining Institutional Success: The Case of Italian Regional Government. The American Political Science Review, 77(1).
  34. Renard V. (2007). Property rights and the transfer of development rights. Question of efficiency and equity. Town Planning Review, 78(1): 41-60.
  35. Ricardo D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Kitchener: Batoche Books. Testo disponibile al sito: http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/ricardo/Principles.pdf (ultimo accesso: 25 luglio 2015).
  36. Roscani B. (1972). La rendita edilizia in Italia. In: Indovina F., a cura di, Lo spreco edilizio. Venezia: Marsilio.
  37. Salzano E. (2007). Fondamenti di Urbanistica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  38. Scattoni P. (1987). Processes of Planning and Land Development in Italy. The case study of Chiusi. PhD Thesis, Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle.
  39. Scattoni P. (2004). L’urbanistica dell’Italia contemporanea. Roma: Newton & Compton.
  40. Scattoni P. and Falco E. (2012). The hidden factor in planning and local politics in Italy: the case of Tuscany. Town Planning Review, 83(1):47-67.
  41. Scattoni P. and Williams R.W. (1978). Planning and Regional Devolution: The Italian Case. The Planner, 64: 38-40.
  42. Sica P. (1978). Storia dell’urbanistica. L’Ottocento. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  43. Stella Richter P. (2010). “Intervento” al Workshop “L’urbanistica Italiana dopo le sentenze del Tar sul PRGC di Roma”. Facoltà di architettura “L. Quaroni”, 22 marzo.
  44. Sullo F. (1964). Lo scandalo urbanistico. Firenze: Vallecchi.
  45. Testa V. (1933). La nuova legge urbanistica inglese. Testo disponibile al sito: http://eddyburg.it/article/articleview/3021/0/44/ (ultimo accesso: 18 gennaio 2015).
  46. Vadelorge L. (2005) (sous la direction de), Gouverner les villes nouvelles: le rôle de l’Etat et des collectivités locales, Paris: Editions Le Manuscrit.
  47. Zhu J. (2004). From Land Use Right to Land Development Right: Institutional Change in China’s Urban Development. Urban Studies, 41(7): 1249-1267.

Enzo Falco, Alessandro Boca, Italian planning and fiscal tools for land value recapture: a historical review in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 120/2017, pp. 99-120, DOI:10.3280/ASUR2017-120005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content