Click here to download

Gender representation in corporate governance: a comparison between legal systems
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO  
Author/s: Rossella Rivaro 
Year:  2017 Issue: 148 Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 134-149 FullText PDF:  115 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2017-148008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


In recent years the view consensus is that gender diversity in corporate boards is an important goal of the economic community. This opinion is based on two primary claims. The first is that diversity provides equal opportunities in the labour market. The second increasingly common claim is that diversity will improve organizational processes and firm performance. The law can play a fundamental role for the achievement of a satisfying gender balance in the allocation of the apical roles of the targeted companies. However, the legal solutions that can be adopted to achieve this goal vary substantially, either from the point of view of the technique adopted by the relevant legislators or as to the substance of the regulation, which depends on the selection of the targeted entities, their specific obligations and the tools that they should adopt to fulfil them.
Keywords: Law, corporate governance, gender diversity, hard law, soft law

  1. Adams R.B., Ferreira D. (2009). Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance. J. Fin. Econ.: 291 ss.
  2. Ahern K.R., Dittmar A.K. (2012). The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation. Q. J. Econ.: 137 ss.
  3. Bennet P. (2012). Australia’s Female-less Boardrooms. www.blackrockinvestments.com.au/content /groups/australiansite/documents/literature/women-inboardroom.Pdf, 30.3.2017.
  4. Bennhold K. (2009). Where Would We Be If Women Ran Wall Street? N. Y. Times, Feb. 1.
  5. Bertrand M., Black S.E., Jensen S., Lleras-Muney A. (2014). Breaking the Glass Ceiling? The Effect of Board Quotas on Female Labor Market Outcomes in Norway, http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/marianne.bertrand/research/papers/Paper_and%20Tables_5_29_2014.pdf, 30.3.2017.
  6. Bianco M., Ciavarella A., Signoretti R. (2011). Women on boards in Italy. Testo disponibile al sito www.consob.it.
  7. Brammer S. (2009). Corporate Reputation and Women on the Board. Brit. J. Mgmt.: 17 ss.
  8. Branson D.M. (2012). Initiatives to Place Women on Corporate Boards of Directors - A Global Snapshot. J. Corp. Law: 793 ss.
  9. Butler S.R. (2012). All on board! Strategies for constructing diverse boards of directors. Va. L. & Bus. Rev.: 61 ss.
  10. Callegari M., La Gender Equity e gli interventi dell’Unione Europea: a quando l’armonizzazione? Giur. it.: 2529 ss.
  11. Calvosa L., Rossi S. (2013). Gli equilibri di genere negli organi di amministrazione e controllo delle imprese. ODCC: 3 ss.
  12. Carter D.A., Simkins B.J., Simpson W.J. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity and Firm Value. Fin. Rev.: 33 ss.
  13. Carter D.A., D’Souza F., Simkins B.J., Simpson W.J. (2010). The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of U.S. Boards and Board Committees and Performance. Corp. gov.: an int’l rev.: 396 ss.
  14. Catalyst (2008). Advancing women leaders: the connection between women board directors and women corporate officers. Testo disponibile sul sito http://perma.cc/37BC-FR65.
  15. Catalyst (2011). The bottom line: corporate performance and women’s representation on boards (2004-2008). Testo disponibile sul sito http://perma.cc/bee2-zjmu.
  16. Catalyst (2017). Women CEOs of the S&P 500. Testo disponibile sul sito www.catalyst.org, 30.3.2017.
  17. CGE, 7.10.1995, C-405/93. Testo disponibile sul sito www.curia.eu.
  18. CGE, 11.11.1997 C-409/95. Testo disponibile sul sito www.curia.eu.
  19. CGE, 8.3.2000, C-158/97. Testo disponibile sul sito www.curia.eu.
  20. CGE, 6.7.2000, C-407/98. Testo disponibile sul sito www.curia.eu.
  21. Choudhury B. (2015). Gender Diversity on Boards: Beyond Quotas. Testo disponibile sul sito www.ssrn.com, 30.3.2017.
  22. Corte cost., 12.9.1995, n. 422. Testo disponibile sul sito www.giurcost.org.
  23. Corte cost., 13.2.2003, n. 49. Testo disponibile sul sito www.giurcost.org.
  24. Corte cost., 14.1.2010, n. 4. Testo disponibile sul sito www.giurcost.org.
  25. Dagnes J. (2015). La rappresentanza di genere nei CdA italiani: una prospettiva sociologica. Giur. it.: 2256 ss.
  26. Davies E.M. (2011). Women on boards. Testo disponbile sul sito www.gov.uk, 30.3.2017.
  27. Desana E. (2015). L’equilibrio di genere: la Legge Golfo-Mosca nel quadro delle azioni positive. Giur. it.: 2515 ss.
  28. Drygala T. (2015). Harte Quote, weiche Quote und die Organpflichten von Vorstand und Aufsichtsrat. NZG: 1129 ss.
  29. Erhardt N.L., Werbel J.D., Shrader C.B. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corp. Gov.: an int’l rev.: 102 ss.
  30. European Commission (2016). Gender balance on corporate boards. Europe is cracking the glass ceiling. Testo disponibile sul sito www.europa.eu, 30.3.2017.
  31. Garilli C. (2012). Le quote di genere nella composizione degli organi delle società per azioni. Eur. dir. priv.: 885 ss.
  32. Grant Thornton (2016). Women in business. Testo disponibile sul sito www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/articles/women-in-business-2016/.
  33. Hampton P., Alexander H. (2016). FTSE Women Leaders. Testo disponibile sul sito www.gov.uk, 30.3.2017.
  34. Heidenreich V. (2012). Why Gender Quotas in Company Boards in Norway – and Not in Sweden? In: Engelstad F., Teigen M., a cura di, Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Bingley Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.: 154 ss.
  35. Innocenti A., Pazienza M.G. (2006). Altruism and Gender in the Trust Game. Testo disponibile sul sito www.ssrn.com, 30.3.2017.
  36. Jianakoplos N.A., Bernasek A. (1998). Are Women More Risk Adverse? Econ. Inquiry: 620 ss.
  37. Klettner A. (2016). Corporate Governance Codes And Gender Diversity: Management-Based Regulation In Action. UNSW Law Journal: 715 ss.
  38. Lepri P. (2014). Germania, dal 2016 quote rosa per i cda: il 30% dei posti alle donne. Il Corriere della sera, 26.11.2014.
  39. MacLeod Heminway J. (2007). Wanted: Female Corporate Directors. Pace L. Rev.: 249 ss.
  40. Miller T., Triana C. (2009). Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity-Firm Performance Relationship. J. Mgmt. Studies: 755 ss.
  41. Milne R. (2012). Deja-vu in Norway over EU’s Women Quotas. Fin. Times, Oct. 23.
  42. Morera U. (2014). Sulle ragioni dell’equilibrio di genere negli organi delle società quotate e pubbliche. Riv. dir. comm., II: 155 ss.
  43. Noland N., Moran T., Kotschwar B. (2016). Is Gender Diversity Pro table? Evidence from a Global Survey. Testo disponibile sul sito https://piie.com/publications/wp/wp16-3.pdf, 30.3.2017.
  44. Reiersen H., Sjafjell B. (2008). Report from Norway: Gender Equality in the Board Room. Eur. Co. L.: 191 ss.
  45. Rhode D., Packel A.K. (2014). Diversity on corporate boards: how much difference does difference make? Testo disponibile sul sito www.ssrn.com, 30.3.2017.
  46. Seierstad C., Opsahl T. (2010). For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. Testo disponibile sul sito www.ssrn.com.
  47. Simpson A., Whitmarsh T. (2015). Petition for amendment of proxy rule regarding board nominee disclosure. March 31, 2015. Testo disponibile sul sito www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/2015/petn4-682.pdf, 30.3.2017.
  48. Smale A. (2013). Progress, but Still a Long Way to Go, for Women in Norway. N. Y.Times, June 4.
  49. The Economist (2017). The best and worst places to be a working woman. March 8.
  50. Zahra S.A., Stanton W.W. (1988). The Implications of Board of Directors’ Composition for Corporate Strategy and Performance. Int’l j. Mgmt.: 229 ss.

Rossella Rivaro, Gender representation in corporate governance: a comparison between legal systems in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 148/2017, pp. 134-149, DOI:10.3280/SL2017-148008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content