Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
The purposive approach assessed from a reflexive labour law perspective. Comments on A Purposive Approach to Labour Law by Guy Davidov
Titolo Rivista: GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI  
Autori/Curatori: Ralf Rogowski 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2017 Fascicolo: 156 Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  7 P. 773-779 Dimensione file:  203 KB
DOI:  10.3280/GDL2017-156008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 





  1. Adams Z. (2016). Review of A Purposive Approach to Labour Law. CLJ: 632 ss.
  2. Atkinson J. (2017). Review of A Purposive Approach to Labour Law. ILJ: 303 ss.
  3. Atleson J. (1983). Values and Assumptions in American Labor Law. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  4. Benjamin W. (1992[1940]). Theses on the Philosophy of History. In Benjamin W., Illuminations. London: Fontana, 245 ss.
  5. Collins H. (2010). Employment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
  6. Collins H. (2011). Theories of Rights as Justifications for Labour Law. In: Davidov G., Langille B. (eds.), The Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137 ss. Däubler W. (1975). Das soziale Ideal des Bundesarbeitsgerichts. Frankfurt, Köln: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
  7. Davidov G. (2010). The Enforcement Crisis in Labour Law and the Fallacy of Voluntarist Solutions. IJCLLIR: 61 ss.
  8. Davidov G., Langille B., eds. (2006). Boundaries and frontiers of labour law: goals and means in the regulation of work. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.
  9. Deakin S. (2011). The Contribution of Labour Law to Economic Development & Growth. In: Davidov G., Langille B. (eds.), The Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56 ss.
  10. Del Punta R. (2016). Labour Law and the Capability Approach. IJCLLIR: 383 ss.
  11. Dukes R. (2014). The Labour Constitution. The Enduring Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press.
  12. Estlund C. (2003). Working Together: How Workplace Bonds Strengthen a Diverse Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Estlund C. (2010). Regoverning the Workplace: From Self-Regulation to Co-Regulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  14. Forbath W. (1991). Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  15. Gadamer H.-G. (2010 [1960]). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Seventh ed. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  16. Kahn Freund O. (1931). Das soziale Ideal des Reichsarbeitsgerichts. Mannheim, Berlin, Leipzig: Bensheimer.
  17. Klare K. (1978). Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937-1941. MinnLR: 265 ss.
  18. Koskenniemi M. (1989). From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Koskenniemi M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Luhmann N. (1974). Rechtssystem und Rechtsdogmatik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  21. Luhmann N. (2004). Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Rogowski R. (2013a). Reflexive Labour Law in the World Society. Cheltenham: Edward El-gar Publishing.
  23. Rogowski R. (2013b). Constitutional Courts as Autopoietic Organisations. In: Boulanger C., Wrase M. (eds.), Die Politik des Verfassungsrechts. Interdisziplinäre und vergleichende Perspektiven auf die Rolle und Funktion von Verfassungsgerichten. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 123 ss.
  24. Rogowski R. (2015). The emergence of reflexive global labour law. IB: 72 ss.
  25. Savigny F.K. von (2012[1840]). System des heutigen römischen Rechts. Band 1(Reprint). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
  26. Sinzheimer H. (1923). Die Idee des Arbeitsrechts. ArbR: 721 ss.
  27. Teubner G. (1971). Standards und Direktiven in Generalklauseln: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der empirischen Sozialforschung bei der Präzisierung der Gute-Sitten-Klauseln im Privatrecht. Frankfurt am Mian: Athenäum.
  28. Teubner G. (1975). Folgenkontrolle und responsive Dogmatik. Rechtstheorie, 179 ss. Teubner G. (1993). Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.
  29. Viehweg T. (1953). Topik und Jurisprudenz. München: Beck.
  30. Webb S., Webb B. (1897). Industrial Democracy. London, New York, Bombay: Longmans, Green & Co.

Ralf Rogowski, in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 156/2017, pp. 773-779, DOI:10.3280/GDL2017-156008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche