Click here to download

Exploring the Hidden Aspects of Organizational Change: The Constellation of Controls at a Fiat-Chrysler Automotive Plant
Author/s: Mario Pezzillo Iacono, Ernesto De Nito, Marcello Martinez, Riccardo Mercurio 
Year:  2017 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  21 Pg. 69-89 FullText PDF:  214 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SO2017-002004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This paper examines and interprets the concept of organizational change using a critical (post-structuralist) approach. The authors aimed to investigate the ‘hidden’ aspects of change, understanding this process as a specific combination of material and discursive practices used by management to regulate employee behaviours. The study explored the relationships between the process of change and the design of the constellation of controls - material controls and discursive regulations - used at the Fiat-Chrysler Automotive plant in Pomigliano D’Arco, in Italy. It found that new rules, organizational solutions and discursive practices often reproduced traditional systems of control. The rationale for organizational change was oriented towards improving flexibility, autonomy and empowerment, but in practice, the changes extended standardization and self-regulation, and made them more comprehensive.
Keywords: Organizational change, constellation of controls, discursive regulations, automotive.

  1. Alvesson, M., Sveningsson S. (2007), Change Organizational Culture: Culture Change Work in Progress, London, Routledge.
  2. Alvesson, M., Willmott, H. (1992), Critical Management Studies, Sage, London.
  3. Badham, R., Buchanan, D. (1999), Power, Politics and Organizational Change: Winning the Turf Game, London, Sage.
  4. Barker, R.J. (1993), “Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 408-437.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2000), Pascalian Meditations, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  6. Cabigiosu, A., Zirpoli, F., Camuffo, A. (2013), “Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry”, Research Policy, 42: 662-675.
  7. Chouliaraki, L., Fairclough, N. (1999), Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.
  8. Clegg, S.R., Rouleau, L. (1992), “Postmodernism and postmodernity in organization analysis”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(1): 8-25.
  9. Contu, A., Willmott, H. (2003), “Re-embedding situatedness: the importance of power relations in learning theory”, Organization Science, 14: 238-96.
  10. Corley, K.G. (2015), “A Commentary on ‘What Grounded Theory Is…’: Engaging a Phenomenon from the Perspective of Those Living it”, Organization-al Research Methods, 18(4): 600-605.
  11. Czarniawska, B. (1995), “Rhetoric and Modern Organizations”, Studies, Culture Organizations and Society, 1: 147-152.
  12. Dawson, P. (2003), “Organisational Change Stories and Management Research: Facts or Fiction”, Journal of Management & Organization, 9(3): 37-49.
  13. Delbridge, R., Ezzamel, M. (2005), “The strength of difference: contemporary conceptions of control”, Organization, 12(5): 603-618.
  14. du Gay, P., Salaman, G. (1992), “The Cult[ure] of the Consumer”, Journal of Management Studies, 29: 615-633.
  15. Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2001), “Power, Control and Resistance in The Factory That Time Forgot”, Journal of management Studies, 38(8): 1053-1079.
  16. FIAT (2012), Testo dell’accordo Fiat di Pomigliano,
  17. Frigant, V., Layan, J.B. (2009), “Modular production and the new division of labour within Europe: the perspective of French automotive parts suppliers”, European Urban and Regional Studies, 16 (1): 11-25.
  18. Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W. (1995), “The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 20: 541-570.
  19. Franco, M., Mariano, S. (2007), “Information technology repositories and knowledge management processes: A qualitative analysis”, Vine, 37(4): 440-451.
  20. Foucault, M. (1980), Power/Knowledge, New York, Pantheon.
  21. Grey, C. (2007), “Possibilities for critical management education and studies”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23: 463-471.
  22. Hardy, C., Thomas, R. (2015), “Discourse in a material world”, Journal of Management Studies, 52: 680-696.
  23. Harvey, D. (1998), Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference, Oxford, Blackwell.
  24. Hook, D. (2007), Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Jansson, N. (2013), “Organizational change as practice: a critical analysis”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6): 1003-1019.
  26. Jian, G. (2011), “Articulating circumstance, identity and practice: toward a dis-cursive framework of organizational changing”, Organization, 18(1): 45-64.
  27. Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. (2008), “The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy”, Organization Studies, 29(11): 1391-1426.
  28. Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as practice: an activity-based approach, London, Sage.
  29. Jarzabkowski, P. (2004), “Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use”, Organization Studies, 25: 529-560.
  30. Johnson, L. (2014), “Adapting and combining constructivist grounded theory and discourse analysis: A practical guide for research”, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 8(1): 100-116.
  31. Jones, R., Latham, J., Betta, M. (2013), “Creating the illusion of employee empowerment: lean production in the international automobile industry”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(8): 1629-1645.
  32. Kunda, G. (1992), Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation, Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
  33. Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., Van de Ven, A.H. (2013), “Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow”, Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 1–13.
  34. Laine, P., Vaara, E. (2007), “Struggling over subjectivity: a discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group”, Human Relations, 60(1): 29-58.
  35. Martinez, M., Pezzillo Iacono M. (2013), “Dealing with critical IS research: artifacts, drifts, electronic panopticon and illusions of empowerment”, in Baskerville R., De Marco M., Spagnoletti P., Designing Organisational Systems - An Interdisciplinary Discourse, Springer.
  36. Moran, J. (2002), Interdisciplinarity, London, Blackwell.
  37. Mintzberg, H. (1984), The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, Free Press, New York, NY.
  38. Morgan, G., Spicer A. (2009), “Critical approaches on organizational change”, in Alvesson M., Bridgman T. and Willmott H., The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  39. Pezzillo Iacono, M., Esposito, V., Mercurio, R. (2012), “Controllo manageriale e regolazione dell’identità organizzativa: la prospettiva dei Critical Management Studies”, Management Control, 1: 7-26.
  40. Pezzillo Iacono, M., Martinez, M., Mangia, G., Canonico, P., De Nito, E. (2013), “Coping with power of control: the role of IS in an Italian integrated tariff system”, in Spagnoletti, P., Organizational change and Information system. Working and Living Together in New Ways, Springer.
  41. Reckwitz, A. (2002), “Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing” European Journal of Social Theory, 5: 243-263.
  42. Reed, M. (2000), “The limits of discourse analysis in organizational analyses”, Organization, 7: 524-530.
  43. Ricoeur, P. (1986), “Life: A Story in Search of a Narrator”, in Facts and Values, ed. M.C. Doeser. Dordrecht, M. Nijhoff.
  44. Salazar, M.K. (1990), “Interviewer bias: How it affects survey research”, AAOHN Journal, 38(1) 2: 567-572.
  45. Shook, J. (2010), “How to change a culture: Lessons from NUMMI”, MIT Sloan Management Review (Winter 2010). Retrieved from
  46. Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., Kärreman, D. (2009), “Critical performativity: the un-finished business of Critical Management Studies”, Human Relations, 62(4): 537-60.
  47. Spicer, A., Böhm, S. (2007) “Moving management: theorizing struggles against the hegemony of management”, Organization Studies, 28: 1667-1698.
  48. Strauss A., Corbin J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, London, Sage.
  49. Sturdy, A. (2003), “Knowing the Unknowable? A Discussion of Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Emotion Research and Organizational Studies”, Organization, 19(1): 81-105.
  50. Toralla, M.S.P., Falzon, P., Morais, A. (2012), “Participatory design in lean production? which contribution from employees for what end”, Work, 41: 2706–2712.
  51. Tsoukas, H., Chia, R. (2002), “On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change”, Organization Science, 13(5): 761-778.
  52. Van Maanen, J. (1979), “Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational re-search: a preface”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 520-526.
  53. Zanoni, P., Janssens, M. (2007), “Minority employees engaging with (diversity) management: an analysis of control, agency, and micro-emancipation”, Journal of Management Studies, 44(8): 1371-1397.

Mario Pezzillo Iacono, Ernesto De Nito, Marcello Martinez, Riccardo Mercurio, in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 2/2017, pp. 69-89, DOI:10.3280/SO2017-002004


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content