Click here to download

Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users
Author/s: Giovanna Magnani, Tommaso Bertolotti, Antonella Zucchella 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  24 Pg. 39-62 FullText PDF:  1044 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MC2018-001004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

In this paper, we analyze how car sharing is experienced by both active sharers and reluctant users. We integrate the consumer culture theory perspective with a cognitive approach to gain knowledge as to the cognitive aspects involved in the decision to use car sharing services. Through a phenomenographic design, we explore the different understandings of car sharing on a sample of Italian Millennials, interviewed either with a dedicated Focus Group or through in-depth individual interviews. Within our design, we employ what we call a "cognitive approach" to Focus Groups. We find three emerging understandings of car sharing and hypothesize that Millennials’ attitude towards the sharing economy may be affected by a mild extent of cognitive dissonance.
Keywords: Sharing, ownership, use, understandings, cognitive, phenomenography

  1. Shaheen S. (1999). Dynamics in behavioral adaptation to a transportation innovation: A case study of CarLink A smart carsharing system. UCD-ITS-RR-99-16. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
  2. Shaheen S. and Rodier C. (2005). Travel effects of a suburban commuter carsharing service: Carlink case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1927: 182-188., DOI: 10.3141/1927-21
  3. Sherry J.F. JR, Kozinets R.V. and Borghini S. (2007). Agents in paradise. Experiential co-creation through emplacement, ritualization, and community. In: Carù A. and Cova B. (eds.). Consuming Experiences, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 17-33.
  4. Snare F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9: 200-206. -- Retrieved from
  5. Steg L. (2005). car use: lust and must. instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39: 147-162.
  6. Arnould E.J. and Rose A.S. (2016). Mutuality critique and substitute for Belk’s sharing. Marketing Theory, 16: 75-99., DOI: 10.1177/1470593115572669
  7. Arnould E.J. and Thompson C.J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31: 868-882., DOI: 10.1086/426626
  8. Arthusson D. (2016). How millennials are defining the sharing economy. Entrepreneur June, 9, -- Retrieved from
  9. Ballús-Armet, I., Shaheen, S., Clonts, K. and Weinzimmer, D. (2014). Peer-to-peer carsharing: Exploring public perception and market characteristics in the San Francisco bay area, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416: 27-36., DOI: 10.3141/2416-04
  10. Bayton J.A. (1958). Motivation, cognition, learning-basic factors in consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 22: 282-289., DOI: 10.2307/1247119
  11. Bardhi F. and Eckhardt G.M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39: 881-898., DOI: 10.1086/666376
  12. Bardhi F., Eckhardt G.M., and Arnould E.J. (2012). Liquid relationship to possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39: 510-529., DOI: 10.1086/664037
  13. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  14. Bartels D.M. and Johnson E.J. (2015). Connecting cognition and consumer choice. Cognition, 135: 47-51.
  15. Belk R.W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research. 15:39-168., DOI: 10.1086/432239
  16. Belk R.W. (2007). Why not share rather than own?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 611: 126-140., DOI: 10.1177/0002716206298483.
  17. Belk R.W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36: 715-734., DOI: 10.1086/612649
  18. Belk R.W. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67: 1595-1600.
  19. Belk R.W., Ger G. and Askegaard S. (2000). The missing streetcar named desire. In: Mick D. G., Huffman C., Ratneshwar S., editors, The Why of Consumption, London: Routledge, pp. 98-119.
  20. Bertolotti T. and Magnani L. (2014). An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip-based knowledge. Synthese, 191: 4037-4067.
  21. Botsman R. and Rogers R. (2010). Beyond Zipcar: Collaborative consumption. Harvard Business Review, 88: 30.
  22. Cahill L. S. (2004). Bioethics and the Common Good. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press.
  23. Chen Y. (2009). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35: 925-940., DOI: 10.1086/593699
  24. Cooper J. (2007). Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory. London: Sage Publishing.
  25. Corciolani M. (2016). Fare e ricevere regali nella sharing economy. Teorie, comunità e pratiche di consume. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 33: 287-309., DOI: 10.7433/1094
  26. Daley M., and Rissel C. (2011). Perspectives and images of cycling as a barrier or facilitator of cycling. Transport policy, 18: 211-216.
  27. Delbosc A. and Currie G. (2013). Causes of youth licensing decline: A synthesis of evidence. Transport Reviews, 33: 271-290., DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.801929
  28. Deneulin S. and Townsend N. (2006). Public goods, global public goods and the common good. Eesrc research group well-being in developing countries, wed working paper 18. – Retrieved from:
  29. Dupré L. (1993). The common good and the open society. The Review of Politics, 55: 87-712.
  30. Dutzik T., Inglis J. and Baxandall P. (2014). Millennials in motion: Changing travel habits of young Americans and the implications for public policy. U.S. PIRG education fund and frontier group. -- Retrieved from
  31. Efthymiou D., Antoniou C. and Waddell P. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers. Transport Policy, 29: 64-73.
  32. Festinger L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  33. Hamari J., Sjöklint M. and Ukkonen A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67: 2047-2059.
  34. Hardin G. (1968). Tragedy of the commons. Science, 162: 1243-1248.
  35. Fisher R.J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20: 303-315., DOI: 10.1086/209351
  36. Garikapati V.M., Pendyala R.M., Morris E.A., Mokhtarian P.L., and Mcdonald M. (2016). Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: A generation in transition?. Transport Reviews, 36: 558-584., DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1197337
  37. Hollenbach D. (2002). The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Kuhnimhof T., Armoogum J., Buehler R., Dargay J., Denstadli J.M. and Yamamoto T. (2012). Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults-evidence from six industrialized countries. Transport Reviews, 32: 761-779., DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2012.736426
  39. Kuhnimhof T., Buehler R., Wirtz M. and Kalinowska D. (2012). Travel trends among young adults in Germany: Increasing multimodality and declining car use for men. Journal of Transport Geography, 24: 443-450.
  40. Larsen G., Patterson M. and Markham L. (2014). A deviant art: Tattoo-related sigma in an era of commodification. Psychology and Marketing, 31: 670-681.
  41. Marcus G. (2008). Kluge: The Hazardous Construction of the Human Mind. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  42. Martin E., Shaheen S. and Lidicker J. (2010). Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: Results from north American shared-use vehicle survey. Transportation research record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143: 150-158., DOI: 10.3141/2143-19
  43. Marton F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought. 21: 28-49. -- Retrieved from
  44. Marton F. (2014). Necessary Conditions of Learning. New York: Routledge.
  45. Maslow A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.
  46. Mcdonald N.C. (2015). Are Millennials really the ‘go-nowhere’ generation?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81: 90-103., DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1057196
  47. Möhlmann M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14: 193-207.
  48. Morency C., Trépanier M., Agard B., Martin B. and Quashie J. (2007). Car sharing system: What transaction datasets reveal on users’ behaviors. In: 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference proceedings (pp. 284-289), IEEE.
  49. O’Leary J., Sandberg J. (2017). Managers’ practice of managing diversity revealed: A practice theoretical account. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4): 512-536.
  50. Polzin S.E. and Chu X., Godfrey J. (2014). The impact of Millennials’ travel behavior on future personal vehicle travel. Energy Strategy Reviews, 5: 59-65.
  51. Osservatorio Sharing Mobility (2015). Rapporto Nazionale sulla Sharing Mobility. -- Retrieved from:
  52. Samuelson P.A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36: 387-389., DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01372-2_2
  53. Sandberg J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 9-25., DOI: 10.2307/1556383
  54. Sandberg J. (2005). How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches?. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 41-68., DOI: 10.1177/1094428104272000
  55. Schaefers T. (2013). Exploring carsharing usage motives: A hierarchical means-end Chain analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 47: 69-77.
  56. Schembri S. and Sandberg J. (2002). Service quality and the consumer’s experience: Towards an interpretive approach. Marketing Theory. 2: 189-205., DOI: 10.1177/147059310222003

Giovanna Magnani, Tommaso Bertolotti, Antonella Zucchella, in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 1/2018, pp. 39-62, DOI:10.3280/MC2018-001004


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content