Clicca qui per scaricare

Il difficile percorso per una legge di civiltà A proposito della Legge 22 dicembre 2017, n. 219
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO  
Autori/Curatori: Carla Faralli 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2018 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  9 P. 175-183 Dimensione file:  213 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SD2018-001008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 




The Italian Parliament recently enacted a law on informed consent and living wills that fills a gap in the Italian legal system and incorporates the principles that in recent decades have been established by the case law. The law is commonly referred to as the "living will law", but in truth this matter is only covered under Article 4. This provision belongs to a coherent path outlined for the care relationship, which lasts from the moment of informed consent (Article 1) to what has been termed "advance care planning" (Article 5). The law as a whole can be held up as an example of what Stefano Rodotà described as an "open and light" legislative model: open in the sense that it makes room for patients’ freedom of choice; light in the sense that it is not overly charged with moral content. In order for the law to have any practical force, it will have to be properly applied. This means that informed consent, living wills, and advance care planning cannot be reduced to mere bureaucratic formalities, to signatures placed on standard forms. They rather will have to grow out of a process of communication capable of building the trust needed for an appropriate therapeutic alliance between two people, each bringing different values to the relationship, as well as different skillsets.
Keywords: Informed consent, Living will, Advance care planning, Self-determination, Physician’s role

  1. Bacone, Francesco, [1623]1965. Della dignità e del progresso delle scienze. In Enrico De Mas (a cura di), Opere filosofiche. Vol. 2. Bari: Laterza.
  2. Carusi, Donato, 2016. Tentativi di legiferare in materia di testamento biologico. Contributo a un dibattito da rianimare. Torino: Giappichelli.
  3. Cricenti, Giuseppe, 2017. I giudici e la bioetica. Casi e questioni. Roma: Carocci.
  4. Pence, Gregory E., 2011. Comas: Karen Quinlan, Nancy Cruzan, and Terri Schiavo. In Id., Medical Ethics: Accounts of Ground-Breaking Cases. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Rodotà, Stefano, 1995. Tecnologie e diritti. Bologna: il Mulino.
  6. 2006. La vita e le regole. Tra diritto e non diritto. Milano: Feltrinelli.



  1. Matteo Finco, Forms of Subjectification: Rights and Freedom as Neoliberal Politics in Healthcare System. The Italian Law on Living Will in Oñati Socio-legal Series /2019 pp. , DOI: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1049
  2. Raimondo Iemma, Open Government Data: A Focus on Key Economic and Organizational Drivers in SSRN Electronic Journal /2012 pp. , DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2262943
  3. Giulia Fantini, Chiara Oldani, Italian Ordinary Statute Regions and Derivatives in SSRN Electronic Journal /2015 pp. , DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2689338

Carla Faralli, in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2018, pp. 175-183, DOI:10.3280/SD2018-001008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche