Clicca qui per scaricare

Mapping socio-technical controversies about same-sex couples’ access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies in France and Portugal
Titolo Rivista: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Autori/Curatori: Catarina Delaunay 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2018 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 72-89 Dimensione file:  116 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2018-002006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


This article seeks to map socio-technical controversies in France and Portugal over the extension of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) to same-sex couples. It focuses on controversies that, over the long term, set actors with divergent representations, interests and beliefs against each other. I approach this problem theoretically and empirically through the analysis of legislation, parliamentary debates, mass-media coverage and in-depth interviews. After introducing the article’s theoretical framework, I will briefly present the legal framing of ART in France and Portugal, which was similar until mid-2016. Despite the legalisation of same-sex marriage in France (2013) and Portugal (2010), until recently laws and public policies in both countries limited access to ART to heterosexual couples with infertility problems. I will describe the dynamics of social and legal change in both countries, comparing the breakthroughs and setbacks in France with a more linear process in Portugal that culminated in the recent adoption of non-discrimination laws concerning same-sex couples (on ART and adoption). This will involve examining public controversies surrounding the "traditional" family model (a heterosexual couple with children), listing the principles un-derlying the draft laws and exploring the reasoning conveyed by its promoters and opponents. I conclude that social transformations materialized in legal changes depend on both the degree of acceptance by society and the balance of power in national parliaments.


Keywords: Assisted Reproductive Technologies; gamete donation; homoparenthood; socio-technical controversies; social inequalities; health policies.

  1. Cadoret A. (2014). Des parents comme les autres. Homosexualité et parenté. Paris: Odile Jacob.
  2. Callon M. (1981). Pour une sociologie des controverses technologiques. Funda-menta Scientiae, 2 (3/4): 381-399.
  3. Chateauraynaud F. (2011). Sociologie argumentative et dynamique des contro-verses: l’exemple de l’argument climatique dans la relance de l’énergie nu-cléaire en Europe. A contrario, 16: 131-150.
  4. Fassin D. (2003). Anatomie politique d’une controverse. La démocratie sud-africaine à l’épreuve du sida. Critique internationale, 20(3): 93-112.
  5. Gross M. (2012). Qu’est-ce que l’homoparentalité? Paris: Payot.
  6. Gross M. (2013). Parent ou homo, fault-il choisir? Paris: Le Cavalier Bleu.
  7. Latour B. (2011). Nous construisons des outils pour évaluer les controverses. Pro-pos recueillis par N. Chevassus-au-Louis. La Recherche, 456: 76-79.
  8. Lemieux C. (2007). À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses? Mil neuf cent. Revue d’histoire intellectuelle, 25: 191-212.
  9. Portelli S. & Richard C. (2012). Désirs de familles. Homosexualité et parentalité. Ivry-sur-Seine: Les Éditions de l’Atelier.
  10. Théry I. & Leroyer A.-M. (dir.) (2014). Filiation, origines, parentalité. Le droit face aux nouvelles valeurs de responsabilité générationnelle. Rapport remis à la Ministre déléguée chargée de la famille, Ministère des affaires sociales et de la santé. -- Available on: http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/144000¬203/index.shtml

Catarina Delaunay, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2018, pp. 72-89, DOI:10.3280/SES2018-002006

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche