Clicca qui per scaricare

Verso un "museo partecipato": arti e tradizioni popolari a Roma
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE  
Autori/Curatori: Lia Luchetti, Anna Lisa Tota 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2018 Fascicolo: 56 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  25 P. 18-42 Dimensione file:  335 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SC2018-056003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 




This article presents the results of a longitudinal ethnographic research on the Museum of Arts and Popular Traditions in Rome, mapping its transition from storage of memories, traditions and cultural objects coming from different Italian regions to an "open and participatory museum", with a strong connection to the surrounding area. The research has dealt with several central issues for the contemporary museum sociology, including: a) the problem of the multiple definitions of the museum identity; b) the relationship between museum and community and its ability to intervene in the conservation/redefinition and transmission of cultural values; c) the enhancement of the relationship with the public; d) the problems related to the mise en scène of both the intangible and tangible cultural heritages with their shifting boundaries and mutual overlapping.
Keywords: Reception studies, audience development, museum studies, museum sociology, participatory museum.

  1. Baudrillard J. (1977), L’effet Beaubourg: implosion et dissuasion, Galilée, Paris; trad. it. Simulacri e impostura: bestie, Beaubourg, apparenze e altri oggetti, Cappelli, Bologna, 1980.
  2. Crew S. R., Sims J. E. (1991), Situare l’autenticità: frammenti di un dialogo, in Karp I., Lavine S. D. (eds.), Exhibiting Cultures. The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display, Smithsonian Institution press, Washington; trad. it. Musei e identità. Poetiche e politiche dell’allestimento museale, CLUEB, Bologna, 1995, pp. 75-98. de Varine-Bohan H. (1973), Un musée «éclaté»: le Musée de l'homme et de l'industrie. Le Creusot-Montceau-les-Mines, in «Museum», Revue trimestrielle publiée par l’Unesco, 4, Vol. XXV, p.242-249.
  3. Eco U., (1979), Lector in fabula, Bompiani, Milano.
  4. Fyfe G. (2006), Sociology and the Social Aspects of Museums, in Macdonald S. (ed.), A Companion to Museum Studies, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 33-49.
  5. Gemini L., Brilli S. (2019), Il pubblico del teatro contemporaneo fra autoosservazione e processi di fruizione, in «Comunicazioni sociali», in pubblicazione.
  6. Henning M. (2006), New Media, in Macdonald S. (ed.), A Companion to Museum Studies, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 302-318.
  7. Hooper-Greenhill E. (ed.) (1995), Museum, Media, Message, Routledge, London.
  8. Insolera I., Di Majo L. (1986), L’EUR e Roma dagli anni Trenta al Duemila, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
  9. Karp I., Lavine S. D. (eds.) (1991), Exhibiting Cultures. The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington; trad. it. Musei e identità. Poetiche e politiche dell’allestimento museale, CLUEB, Bologna, 1995.
  10. Karp I., Mullen Kreamer C., Lavine S. D. (eds.) (1992), Museums and Communities. The Politics of Public Culture, Smithsonian Institution press, Washington; trad. it. Musei e identità. Politica culturale delle collettività, CLUEB, Bologna, 1995.
  11. Macdonald S. (ed.) (1988), The Politics of Display: Museums, Science, Culture, Routledge, London.
  12. Macdonald S. (1995), Consuming Science: Public Knowledge and the Dispersed Politics of Reception among Museum Visitors, in «Media, Culture & Society», 17, pp. 13-29.
  13. Macdonald S. (ed.) (2006), A Companion to Museum Studies, Blackwell, Oxford.
  14. Macdonald S., Fyfe, G. (1996), Theorizing Museums. Representing Identity and Diversity in Changing World, Blackwell, Oxford.
  15. Massari S. (2004), Arti e Tradizioni. Il Museo Nazionale dell’Eur, De Luca Editori D’arte, Roma.
  16. Prior N. (2006), Postmodern Restructuring, in Macdonald S. (ed.), A Companion to Museum Studies, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 509-524.
  17. Sandell R. (1998), Museums as Agents of Social Inclusion, in «Museum, Management and Curatorship», Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 401-418.
  18. Simon N. (2010), The participatory Museum, Museum 2.0, Santa Cruz.
  19. Tchen J. K. W. (1992), Creating a Dialogic Museum: the Chinatown History Museum Experiment, in Karp I., Mullen Kreamer C., Lavine S. D. (eds.), Museums and Communities. The Politics of Public Culture, Smithsonian Institution press, Washington, pp. 285-326.
  20. Tota A. L. (2002), Sociologie dell’arte. Dal museo tradizionale all’arte multimediale, Roma, Carocci. Tota A. L. (2005) Sociologia de los museos. El museo como vivencia personal: propuestas, in Roche J. A. (ed.), Cultura y Globalizaciòn. Entre el conflicto y el dialogo, Publicaciones Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, pp. 367-388.
  21. Tota A. L. (2014), When Sociology Meets the Work of Art: Analytical Framework to Study Artistic Production and Reception, in Barber M., Jochen D. (eds.), The Interrelation of Phenomenology, Social Sciences and the Arts, Springer, New York, pp. 95-116.
  22. Vergo P. (ed.) (1989), The New Museology, Reaktion books, London.
  23. Zolberg V. (1990), Constructing a Sociology of the Arts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; trad. it., Sociologia dell’arte, Bologna, il Mulino, 1994.
  24. Weil S. E. (1983), Beauty and the Beasts: on Museums, Art, the Law, and the Market, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.

Lia Luchetti, Anna Lisa Tota, in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 56/2018, pp. 18-42, DOI:10.3280/SC2018-056003

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche