Clicca qui per scaricare

Medical conceptions of control in the field of commercial surrogacy in Kazakhstan
Titolo Rivista: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Autori/Curatori: Alya Guseva, Vyacheslav Lokshin 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: 1 Gestational surrogacy: A sociological and interdisciplinary approach. Consuelo Corradi, Daniela Bandelli (a cura di) Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 26-43 Dimensione file:  174 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2019-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

Taking markets-as-fields perspective (Fligstein, 1996), we discuss and examine the central role that the fertility professionals in Kazakhstan played in establishing medical conceptions of control - understandings of the fundamental guiding principles of exchange in a given field - over the ethically fraught surrogacy practice. Only gestational surrogacy is legal in Kazakhstan, and it is only available to officially married couples, whose inability to have children fits with one of the five medical diagnoses, with no other limitations based on age or their country of origin. Therefore, surrogacy is defined as medical help to those in medical need, rather than a commercial service. Moreover, to further ascertain themselves as carrying and uncorrupted professionals, Kazakh doctors restrict their responsibility to the medical side of surrogacy (testing and IVF) and distance themselves from both the commerce of surrogacy, and from entanglement in the management of relationships - and, therefore, potential conflicts - between surrogate mothers and intended parents. These tasks are usually outsourced to specialized surrogacy agencies - the middlemen that buffer medical professionals from the "messiness" of relationships and symbolic contamination by the market.

Keywords: Gestational surrogacy; Kazakhstan; market-as-fields; conceptions of control; medical profession; commerce

  1. Beckert J. (2010). How do fields change? The interrelations of institutions, networks, and cognition in the dynamics of market. Organization Studies, 31, 5: 605–627. DOI 10.1177/0170840610372184
  2. Berend Z. (2016). The Online World of Surrogacy. New York: Berghahn.
  3. Charmaz K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. New York: Sage.
  4. Corbin J, Strauss A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed.. New York: Sage.
  5. Dzhusubalieva T.M. (2016). Surrogacy in the Republic of Kazakhstan: legal, medical, ethical problems. Reproductive Medicine, 4(29): 60-63. ISSN 2303-9949
  6. Field M. (1955). Former Soviet citizens’ Aattitudes towards the Soviet, the German and the American medical systems. American Sociological Review 20(6): 674-679., DOI: 10.2307/208867
  7. Fligstein N. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61,4: 656-673., DOI: 10.2307/209639
  8. Fligstein N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19:105-125., DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.0013
  9. Fox R.C. (2000). Medical uncertainty revisited. In G. L. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, and S. C. Scrimshaw, a cura di, The Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. London: Sage Publications.
  10. Freidson E. (1988[1970]). Profession of Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Guseva A. (2017). Moralno-eticheskie i yuridicheskie aspekty surrogatnogo materinstva: istoki, mezhdunarodny opyt, problemy (in Russian). Reproductive Medicine, 4(33): 7-11. ISSN 2303-9949
  12. Jacobson H. (2016). Labor of Love: Gestational Surrogacy and the Work of Making Babies. Rutgers: University Press.
  13. Johnson K. (2017). Contingent maternalities? Maternal claims-making in third party reproduction. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8: 1349-1364., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.1258
  14. Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T.B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 657-679., DOI: 10.2307/2015961
  15. Rona-Tas A., A. Guseva. (2014). Plastic Money: Constructing Markets for Credit Cards in Eight Postcommunist Countries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  16. Rudrappa S. (2015). Discounted Life: The Price of Global Surrogacy in India. New York: NYU Press.
  17. Starr P. (1982). The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.
  18. Teman E. (2010). Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  19. Twine F.W. (2015). Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market, 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge.
  20. Ziff E. (2017). ‘The mommy deployment’: Military spouses and surrogacy in the United States. Sociological Forum, 32(2): 406-425.

Alya Guseva, Vyacheslav Lokshin, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1/2019, pp. 26-43, DOI:10.3280/SES2019-001003


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche