Click here to download

An Empirical Fiction. Epistemology for Intellectual Work at the Crossroad between Sociology and Literature
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO  
Author/s: Stefano Bory 
Year:  2019 Issue: 153 Language: Italian 
Pages:  22 Pg. 76-97 FullText PDF:  298 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2019-153005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This essay provides a theoretical and epistemological thought on the relationship between Sociology and Literature. Starting from a critical review of sociological and narrative studies, the paper analyzes the transformations of academic labor. The first part explores some epistemological approaches useful to assume fiction as an integral part of social phenomena, avoiding any attempt to use fiction as an object of inquiry, separated from researchers. Novel is not only a source of sociological data but also a specific form of expression of social reality. In the second part of the essay, this approach is used to analyze some specific insights of academic labor by using novels whose main characters are researchers and academic scholars (White Noise by DeLillo; Stoner by Williams; The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown).
Keywords: Sociology of literature, narratology, academic labour, epistemology, fiction-truth

  1. Abruzzese A. (1979). Verso una sociologia del lavoro intellettuale: materiali per una sociologia del lavoro intellettuale negli apparati dell’informazione. Napoli: Liguori.
  2. Barrère A. e Martuccelli D. (2009). Le roman comme laboratoire. De la connaissance littéraire à l’imagination sociologique. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
  3. Barthes R. (1953). Le degré zéro de l’écriture. Paris: Éditions du Seuil (trad it.: Il grado zero della scrittura. Torino: Einaudi, 1982).
  4. Baudorre P., Rabaté D., Viart D., a cura di (2007). Littérature et sociologie. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
  5. Berger P.L. (1984). Robert Musil and the Salvage of the Self. Partisan Review, 51, 4: 638-650 (trad. it.: Robert Musil e il salvataggio del sé. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 1992).
  6. Bourdieu P. (1991). Le champ littéraire. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 89: 3-46.
  7. Bourdieu P. (1992). Les règles de l’art. Genèse et structure du champ littéraire. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  8. Brown D. (2003). The Da Vinci Code. New York: Doubleday (trad. it.: Il codice Da Vinci. Milano: Mondadori, 2004).
  9. Carnevali B., a cura di (2016). La saggezza di Stoner. Roma: Fazi.
  10. Coser L.A., a cura di (1963). Sociology through Literature. An Introductory Reader. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  11. Côté J.-F. (1996). Le réalisme social et l’école de Chicago: rencontre de la littérature et de la sociologie dans la communication pragmatiste chez John Steinbeck et Herbert Blumer. Cahiers de recherche sociologique, 26: 115-137.
  12. Czarniawska B. (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research. London-Thousands Oaks-New Delhi: SAGE Publications (trad. it.: La narrazione nelle scienze sociali. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2018).
  13. D’Acunto G. (2016). L’apparenza reale. L’ontologia del gioco di Eugen Fink. Esercizi Filosofici, 11, 1: 1-15.
  14. David J. (2010). La marche des temps: sociologie de la littérature et historicité des œuvres. COnTEXTES, 7, -- testo disponibile al sito: https://journals.openedition.org/contextes/4647#entries, consultato il 17/02/2019.
  15. DeLillo D. (1985). White Noise. New York: Viking Press (trad. it.: Rumore bianco. Torino: Einaudi, 1999).
  16. Devetak R. (2009). After the Event: Don DeLillo’s White Noise and September 11 Narratives. Review of International Studies, 35, 4: 795-815., 10.1017/S0260210509990192DOI: 10.1017/S0260210509990192
  17. Escarpit R. (1958). Sociologie de la littérature. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (trad. it.: Sociologia della letteratura. Napoli: Guida, 1970).
  18. Ferrarotti F. (2016). Osservazioni sul lavoro intellettuale. Chieti: Solfanelli.
  19. Fink E. (1976). Nähe und Distanz. Phänomenologische Vorträge und Aufsätze. Freiburg-München: Karl Alber (trad. it.: Prossimità e distanza. Saggi e discorsi fenomenologici. Pisa: ETS, 2006).
  20. Gadamer H.G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) (trad. it.: Verità e metodo. Milano: Bompiani, 2000).
  21. Goldmann L. (1955). Le dieu caché: étude sur la vision tragique dans les «Pensées» de Pascal et dans le théâtre de Racine. Paris: Gallimard.
  22. Goldmann L. (1964). Pour une sociologie du roman. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it.: Per una sociologia del romanzo. Milano: Bompiani, 1967).
  23. Gross D. (1980). Löwenthal, Adorno, Barthes. Three Perspectives on Popular Culture. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary, 45: 122-140., 10.3817/0980045122DOI: 10.3817/0980045122
  24. Honneth A., a cura di (2015). Stoner – Ambivalenzen einer literarischen Sozialfigur. [Numero monografico di] WestEnd. Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 2, 2015.
  25. Illouz E. (2016). Stoner, ovvero: cos’è una vocazione?. In: Carnevali B., a cura di, La saggezza di Stoner. Roma: Fazi.
  26. Lahire B. (2016). Pour une sociologie de la littérature. Idées économiques et sociales, 4, 186: 6-14.
  27. Lepenies W. (1985). Die drei Kulturen. Soziologie zwischen Literatur und Wissenschaft. München: Hanser (trad. it.: Le tre culture. Sociologia tra letteratura e scienza. Bologna: il Mulino, 1987).
  28. Longo M. (2015). Fiction and Social Reality. Literature and Narrative as Sociological Resources. Farnham: Ashgate.
  29. Lukács G. (1920). Die Theorie des Romans. Ein geschichtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der großen Epik. Berlin: Cassirer (trad. it.: Teoria del romanzo. Milano: SE, 2004).
  30. Mexal S.J. (2001). Realism, Narrative History, and the Production of the Bestseller: The Da Vinci Code and the Virtual Public Sphere. The Journal of Popular Culture, 44, 5: 1085-1101.
  31. Morrow R.A. (1983). La théorie critique de l’École de Francfort: implications pour une sociologie de la littérature. Études françaises, 19, 3: 35-49.
  32. Pavel T.G. (1986). Fictional Worlds. Cambridge (MA.)-London: Harvard University Press (trad. it.: Mondi di invenzione: realtà e immaginario narrativo. Torino: Einaudi, 1992; trad. fr.: Univers de la fiction. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1988).
  33. Rancière J. (2017). Les bords de la fiction. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
  34. Ricœur P. (1969). Le conflit des interprétations. Essai d’herméneutique I. Paris: Éditions du Seuil (trad. it.: Il conflitto delle interpretazioni. Milano: Jaca Book, 1977).
  35. Ricœur P. (1983). Temps et récit. I. L’intrigue et le récit historique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil (trad. it.: Tempo e racconto. I. Milano: Jaca Book, 1986).
  36. Sartre J.-P. (1948). Situations, II. Qu’est-ce que la littérature?. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it.: Che cos’è la letteratura?. Milano: il Saggiatore, 1960).
  37. Schapp W. (1953). In Geschichten verstrickt. Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding. Hamburg: Meiner (trad. it.: Reti di storie. L’essere dell’uomo e della cosa. Milano: Mimesis, 2017).
  38. Schütz A. (1964). Don Quixote and the Problem of Reality. In: Schütz A., Collected Papers II. Studies in Social Theory. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff (trad. it.: Don Chisciotte e il problema della realtà. Roma: Armando Editore, 1995).
  39. Shteyngart G. (2010). Super Sad True Love Story. New York: Random House (trad. it.: Storia d’amore vera e supertriste. Parma: Guanda, 2011).
  40. Thomas W.I. e Znaniecki F. (1918). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Monograph of an Immigrant Group. Boston: Richard G. Badger.
  41. Viart D. (2007). Littérature et sociologie: les champs du dialogue. In: Baudorre P., Rabaté D., Viart D., sous la direction de, Littérature et sociologie. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
  42. Weber M. (1919a). Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Erster Vortrag. Wissenschaft als Beruf. München-Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot (trad. it.: in Il lavoro intellettuale come professione. Torino: Einaudi, 1948).
  43. Weber M. (1919b). Geistige Arbeit als Beruf. Zweiter Vortrag. Politik als Beruf. München-Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot (trad. it.: in Il lavoro intellettuale come professione. Torino: Einaudi, 1948).
  44. Wiese A. (2012). Rethinking Postmodern Narrativity: Narrative Construction and Identity Formation in Don DeLillo’s White Noise. College Literature, 39, 3: 1-25.
  45. Williams J. (1965), Stoner. New York: Viking Press (trad. it.: Stoner. Roma: Fazi, 2012).

Stefano Bory, An Empirical Fiction. Epistemology for Intellectual Work at the Crossroad between Sociology and Literature in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 153/2019, pp. 76-97, DOI:10.3280/SL2019-153005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content