Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
L’impegno per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile come forma di cittadinanza attiva. Uno studio esplorativo sui giovani italiani
Titolo Rivista: PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’ 
Autori/Curatori: Carlo Pistoni, Maura Pozzi, Andrea Bonanomi, Elena Marta 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: 1  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  17 P. 32-48 Dimensione file:  326 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSC2019-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Il tema dello sviluppo sostenibile è, oggigiorno, molto discusso dall’opinione pubblica e le Nazioni Unite si sono impegnate a riguardo identificando 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Il presente lavoro ha studiato l’impegno dei giovani considerandolo a partire da questi goals. L’obiettivo dello studio è stato quello di individuare i profili dei giovani che sono impegnati o meno per lo sviluppo sostenibile, indagando tramite la tecnica degli alberi decisionali quali va-riabili impattano maggiormente. Tra le variabili indagate l’Identificazione Sociale è quella che maggiormente differenzia chi è impegnato e chi no, sebbene il fare, o l’aver fatto, azione socia-le sia un fattore determinante nell’impegno dei giovani.


Keywords: Sviluppo sostenibile, agenda 2030, azione sociale, impegno dei giovani, identi-ficazione sociale

  1. Beato, F. (2005). The three pillars of sustainable development between intergenerational ethics and power asymmetries. In E.M. Tacchi (A cura di). Sustainability development and environmental risk (pp.15-25). London: Foxwell & Davies UK.
  2. Bertoldo, R., Castro, P., & Bousfield, A.B.S. (2013). Pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors: Two levels of response to environmental social norms. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3), 437-448.
  3. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
  4. Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I., (2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 59-68., DOI: 10.1039/C1RP90060
  5. Castro, P. (2012). Legal innovation for social change: exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Political Psychology, 33, 105-121.
  6. Charng, H.W., Piliavin, J.A., & Callero, P.L. (1988). Role Identity and Reasoned Action in the Prediction of Repeated Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 303-317., DOI: 10.2307/278675
  7. De Haan, G., Borman, I., & Leicht, A. (2010). Special issue: The midway point of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Where do we stand? International Review in Education, 56, 199-372.
  8. Demir, B., & Kumkale, T. (2013). Individual differences in willingness to become an organ donor: A decision tree approach to reasoned action. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 63-69.
  9. Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development – Justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11, 149-158.
  10. Emler, N.P. (2011). What does it take to be a political actor in a multicultural society? In M. Barrett, C. Flood & J. Eade (A cura di), Nationalism, ethnicity, citizenship: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 135-162). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  11. Fattori, F., Pozzi, M., Marzana, D., & Mannarini, T. (2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 907-917.
  12. Flanagan, C., Bowes, J., Jonsson, B., Csapo, B., & Sheblanova, E. (1998). Ties that bind: Correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 457-475.
  13. Flanagan, C.A., Levine, P., & Settersten, R. (2007). Civic Engagement and the changing transition to adulthood. CIRCLE.
  14. Gelli, B., & Mannarini, T. (A cura di). (2007). La partecipazione: Modi e percorsi. Milano: Unicopli.
  15. Hochstetler, K., & Keck, M.E. (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  16. Kaplan, M. (1997). The Benefits of Intergenerational Community Service Projects: Implication for Promoting Intergenerational Unity, Community Activism, and Cultural Continuity. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 28, 211-28.
  17. Leiserowitz, A.A., Kates, R.W., & Paris, T.M. (2006). Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annual Review of Environment & Resources, 31, 413-444.
  18. Levy, B.L.M., & Zint, M.T. (2013). Toward fostering environmental political participation: Framing an agenda for environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 19(5), 553-576., DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2012.71721
  19. Lim, V., Funk, M., Marcenaro, L., Regazzoni, C., & Rauterberg, M. (2017). Designing for action: An evaluation of Social Recipes in reducing food waste. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100, 18-32.
  20. Lysgaard, J.A., & Simovska, V. (2016). The significance of ‘participation’ as an educational ideal in education for sustainable development and health education in schools. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 613-630., DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2015.102987
  21. Marta, E., Manzi, C., Pozzi, M., & Vignoles, V. (2014). Identity and the theory of planned behavior: Predicting maintenance of volunteering after three years. Journal of Social Psychology, 154(3), 198-207., DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2014.881769
  22. Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2007a). La trasmissione intergenerazionale della generatività sociale: promuovere impegno e responsabilità nelle nuove generazioni. In E. Scabini e G. Rossi (A cura di). Promuovere famiglia nella comunità. Studi interdisciplinari sulla Famiglia, 22 (pp. 177-199). Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  23. Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2007b). Psicologia del volontariato. Roma: Carocci.
  24. Marta, E., & Scabini, E. (2003). Giovani volontari. Impegnarsi, crescere e far crescere. Giunti: Firenze.
  25. Marzana, D. (2011). Volontari si diventa: Conoscere e promuovere l’impegno nel volontariato e nella politica dei giovani italiani. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  26. Marzana, D., Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2012). Young adults and civic behavior: The psychosocial variables determining it. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 40(1), 49-63., DOI: 10.1080/10852352.2012.63306
  27. Marzana, D., Pozzi, M., Fasanelli, R., Mercuri, F., & Fattori, F. (2016). The relation between participatory social practices and social representations of citizenship: A pilot study of Italian young adults. Voluntas, 27, 1152-1170.
  28. Omoto, A.M. (Ed.) (2005). Processes of community change and social action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  29. Omoto, A.M., & Snyder, M. (2002). Consideration of Community. American Behavioral Science, 45, 846-67., DOI: 10.1177/000276420204500500
  30. Pozzi, M., Pistoni, C., & Alfieri, S. (2017). Verso una psicologia della partecipazione. Una sistematizzazione teorica dei rapporti tra le azioni nel sociale. Psicologia Sociale, 3, 253-275., DOI: 10.1482/8788
  31. Pozzi, M., Quartiroli, A., Alfieri, S., Fattori, F., & Pistoni, C. (2018). (Dis)Obedience in U.S. American Young Adults: A New Way to Describe Authority Relationships. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 404-423.
  32. Saifi, B., & Drake, L. (2008). A coevolutionary model for promoting agricultural sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65, 24-34.
  33. Shepherd, D.A., Kuskova, V., & Patzelt, H. (2009). Measuring the values that underlie sustainable development: The development of a valid scale. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 246-256.
  34. Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14, 323-348.
  35. Snyder, M., & Omoto, A.M. (2007). Social action. In A.W. Kruglansky & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2a ed.) (pp. 940-961). New York: Guilford.
  36. Sundeen, R.A., & Raskoff, S.A. (1994). Volunteering Among Teenagers in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(4), 383-403., DOI: 10.1177/08997640940230040
  37. Thomas, F.E., Mavor, K., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75-88., DOI: 10.1177/136843021141361
  38. Thornicroft, G., & Votruba, N. (2016). Does the United Nations care about mental health? The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(7), 599-600., DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30079-
  39. UN (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Testo disponibile al sito www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.
  40. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535., DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.50
  41. Van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F.M.H. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618-634., DOI: 10.1177/136843021246747
  42. Wheeler, K. (2000). Sustainability from five perspectives. In K.A. Wheeler & A.P. Bijur (Eds.), Education for a sustainable future (pp. 2-6). New York: Kluwer.
  43. Wu, J., Guo, S., Huang, H., Liu, W., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Information and Communications Technologies for Sustainable Development Goals: State-of-the-Art, Needs and Perspectives. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3), 2389-2406., DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2018.281230
  44. Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community Service and Social Responsibility in Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.



  1. Adriano Mauro Ellena, Giovanni Aresi, Elena Marta, Maura Pozzi, Post-traumatic Growth Dimensions Differently Mediate the Relationship Between National Identity and Interpersonal Trust Among Young Adults: A Study on COVID-19 Crisis in Italy in Frontiers in Psychology 576610/2021 pp. , DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.576610

Carlo Pistoni, Maura Pozzi, Andrea Bonanomi, Elena Marta, in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 1/2019, pp. 32-48, DOI:10.3280/PSC2019-001004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche