Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
L’impegno per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile come forma di cittadinanza attiva. Uno studio esplorativo sui giovani italiani
Titolo Rivista: PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’ 
Autori/Curatori: Carlo Pistoni, Maura Pozzi, Andrea Bonanomi, Elena Marta 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: 1 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  17 P. 32-48 Dimensione file:  326 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSC2019-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Il tema dello sviluppo sostenibile è, oggigiorno, molto discusso dall’opinione pubblica e le Nazioni Unite si sono impegnate a riguardo identificando 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Il presente lavoro ha studiato l’impegno dei giovani considerandolo a partire da questi goals. L’obiettivo dello studio è stato quello di individuare i profili dei giovani che sono impegnati o meno per lo sviluppo sostenibile, indagando tramite la tecnica degli alberi decisionali quali va-riabili impattano maggiormente. Tra le variabili indagate l’Identificazione Sociale è quella che maggiormente differenzia chi è impegnato e chi no, sebbene il fare, o l’aver fatto, azione socia-le sia un fattore determinante nell’impegno dei giovani.


Keywords: Sviluppo sostenibile, agenda 2030, azione sociale, impegno dei giovani, identi-ficazione sociale

  1. Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community Service and Social Responsibility in Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Beato, F. (2005). The three pillars of sustainable development between intergenerational ethics and power asymmetries. In E.M. Tacchi (A cura di). Sustainability development and environmental risk (pp.15-25). London: Foxwell & Davies UK.
  3. Bertoldo, R., Castro, P., & Bousfield, A.B.S. (2013). Pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors: Two levels of response to environmental social norms. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3), 437-448.
  4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
  5. Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I., (2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 59-68., 10.1039/C1RP90060DOI: 10.1039/C1RP90060
  6. Castro, P. (2012). Legal innovation for social change: exploring change and resistance to different types of sustainability laws. Political Psychology, 33, 105-121.
  7. Charng, H.W., Piliavin, J.A., & Callero, P.L. (1988). Role Identity and Reasoned Action in the Prediction of Repeated Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(4), 303-317., 10.2307/278675DOI: 10.2307/278675
  8. De Haan, G., Borman, I., & Leicht, A. (2010). Special issue: The midway point of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Where do we stand? International Review in Education, 56, 199-372.
  9. Demir, B., & Kumkale, T. (2013). Individual differences in willingness to become an organ donor: A decision tree approach to reasoned action. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 63-69.
  10. Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development – Justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11, 149-158.
  11. Emler, N.P. (2011). What does it take to be a political actor in a multicultural society? In M. Barrett, C. Flood & J. Eade (A cura di), Nationalism, ethnicity, citizenship: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 135-162). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  12. Fattori, F., Pozzi, M., Marzana, D., & Mannarini, T. (2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 907-917.
  13. Flanagan, C., Bowes, J., Jonsson, B., Csapo, B., & Sheblanova, E. (1998). Ties that bind: Correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 457-475.
  14. Flanagan, C.A., Levine, P., & Settersten, R. (2007). Civic Engagement and the changing transition to adulthood. CIRCLE.
  15. Gelli, B., & Mannarini, T. (A cura di). (2007). La partecipazione: Modi e percorsi. Milano: Unicopli.
  16. Hochstetler, K., & Keck, M.E. (2007). Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  17. Kaplan, M. (1997). The Benefits of Intergenerational Community Service Projects: Implication for Promoting Intergenerational Unity, Community Activism, and Cultural Continuity. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 28, 211-28.
  18. Leiserowitz, A.A., Kates, R.W., & Paris, T.M. (2006). Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annual Review of Environment & Resources, 31, 413-444.
  19. Levy, B.L.M., & Zint, M.T. (2013). Toward fostering environmental political participation: Framing an agenda for environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 19(5), 553-576., 10.1080/13504622.2012.71721DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2012.71721
  20. Lim, V., Funk, M., Marcenaro, L., Regazzoni, C., & Rauterberg, M. (2017). Designing for action: An evaluation of Social Recipes in reducing food waste. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100, 18-32.
  21. Lysgaard, J.A., & Simovska, V. (2016). The significance of ‘participation’ as an educational ideal in education for sustainable development and health education in schools. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 613-630., 10.1080/13504622.2015.102987DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2015.102987
  22. Marta, E., Manzi, C., Pozzi, M., & Vignoles, V. (2014). Identity and the theory of planned behavior: Predicting maintenance of volunteering after three years. Journal of Social Psychology, 154(3), 198-207., 10.1080/00224545.2014.881769DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2014.881769
  23. Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2007a). La trasmissione intergenerazionale della generatività sociale: promuovere impegno e responsabilità nelle nuove generazioni. In E. Scabini e G. Rossi (A cura di). Promuovere famiglia nella comunità. Studi interdisciplinari sulla Famiglia, 22 (pp. 177-199). Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  24. Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2007b). Psicologia del volontariato. Roma: Carocci.
  25. Marta, E., & Scabini, E. (2003). Giovani volontari. Impegnarsi, crescere e far crescere. Giunti: Firenze.
  26. Marzana, D. (2011). Volontari si diventa: Conoscere e promuovere l’impegno nel volontariato e nella politica dei giovani italiani. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  27. Marzana, D., Marta, E., & Pozzi, M. (2012). Young adults and civic behavior: The psychosocial variables determining it. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 40(1), 49-63., 10.1080/10852352.2012.63306DOI: 10.1080/10852352.2012.63306
  28. Marzana, D., Pozzi, M., Fasanelli, R., Mercuri, F., & Fattori, F. (2016). The relation between participatory social practices and social representations of citizenship: A pilot study of Italian young adults. Voluntas, 27, 1152-1170.
  29. Omoto, A.M. (Ed.) (2005). Processes of community change and social action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  30. Omoto, A.M., & Snyder, M. (2002). Consideration of Community. American Behavioral Science, 45, 846-67., 10.1177/000276420204500500DOI: 10.1177/000276420204500500
  31. Pozzi, M., Pistoni, C., & Alfieri, S. (2017). Verso una psicologia della partecipazione. Una sistematizzazione teorica dei rapporti tra le azioni nel sociale. Psicologia Sociale, 3, 253-275., 10.1482/8788DOI: 10.1482/8788
  32. Pozzi, M., Quartiroli, A., Alfieri, S., Fattori, F., & Pistoni, C. (2018). (Dis)Obedience in U.S. American Young Adults: A New Way to Describe Authority Relationships. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 404-423.
  33. Saifi, B., & Drake, L. (2008). A coevolutionary model for promoting agricultural sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65, 24-34.
  34. Shepherd, D.A., Kuskova, V., & Patzelt, H. (2009). Measuring the values that underlie sustainable development: The development of a valid scale. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 246-256.
  35. Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14, 323-348.
  36. Snyder, M., & Omoto, A.M. (2007). Social action. In A.W. Kruglansky & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2a ed.) (pp. 940-961). New York: Guilford.
  37. Sundeen, R.A., & Raskoff, S.A. (1994). Volunteering Among Teenagers in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(4), 383-403., 10.1177/08997640940230040DOI: 10.1177/08997640940230040
  38. Thomas, F.E., Mavor, K., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75-88., 10.1177/136843021141361DOI: 10.1177/136843021141361
  39. Thornicroft, G., & Votruba, N. (2016). Does the United Nations care about mental health? The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(7), 599-600., 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30079-DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30079-
  40. UN (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Testo disponibile al sito www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.
  41. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535., 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.50DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.50
  42. Van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F.M.H. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618-634., 10.1177/136843021246747DOI: 10.1177/136843021246747
  43. Wheeler, K. (2000). Sustainability from five perspectives. In K.A. Wheeler & A.P. Bijur (Eds.), Education for a sustainable future (pp. 2-6). New York: Kluwer.
  44. Wu, J., Guo, S., Huang, H., Liu, W., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Information and Communications Technologies for Sustainable Development Goals: State-of-the-Art, Needs and Perspectives. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3), 2389-2406., 10.1109/COMST.2018.281230DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2018.281230

Carlo Pistoni, Maura Pozzi, Andrea Bonanomi, Elena Marta, in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 1/2019, pp. 32-48, DOI:10.3280/PSC2019-001004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche