Click here to download

Neurosciences and psychoanalysis: a dialogue without vanitas?
Journal Title: PSICOTERAPIA PSICOANALITICA 
Author/s:  Carlo Semenza 
Year:  2019 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  13 Pg. 115-127 FullText PDF:  183 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSP2019-001008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Over the past two decades an increasing number of scholars from different disciplines devoted themselves to theoretical, experimental and clinical studies aiming at answering questions about a possible in-teraction between psychoanalysis and neurosciences. The success of this collective enterprise can now be measured with the increasing pro-portion of studies that, starting from theoretically correct premises, ob-taineded results of great interest. Which results, how and why they were obtained, which errors were made or avoided and in which spe-cific domains, are discussed here in the attempt to encourage, aban-doning sterile contrappositions, an increasingly proficuous attitutude in this research, but also, simply, to help in the comprehension of these complex issues.
Keywords: Neurosciences, psychoanalysis, dialogue, results.

  1. Anderson M.C., Green C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by excutive control. Nature, 410: 366-369., DOI: 10.1038/35066572
  2. Axmacher N., Kessler H., Waldhauser G.T. (2014). Editorial on psychoanalytical neuroscience: exploring psychoanalytic concepts with neuroscientific methods. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 28, 8: 674.
  3. Blass R.B., Carmeli Z. (2007). The case against neuropsychoanalysis. On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis’ latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse. Int J Psychoanal., 88: 19-40.
  4. Blass R.B., Carmeli Z. (2015). Further evidence for the case against neuropsychoanalysis: How Yovell, Solms, and Fotopoulou’s response to our critique confirms the irrelevance and harmfulness to psychoanalysis of the contemporary neuroscientific trend. Int J Psychoanal., 96, 6: 1555-73., DOI: 10.1111/1745-8315.1244
  5. Craparo G., Mucci C. (2017). Unrepressed Unconscious, Implicit Memory and Clinical Work. London: Kamac books., DOI: 10.4324/9780429484629
  6. Erdelyi M.H. (1985). Freud’s cognitive psychology. New York: Freeman.
  7. Elderyi M.H. (2006). The unified theory of repression. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 29: 499-551., DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0600911
  8. Fodor J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Boston: MIT Press.
  9. Fonagy P. (1999). Memory and terapeutic action. Int Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80: 215-223., DOI: 10.1516/002075799159918
  10. Freud S. (1915). L’inconscio. O.S.F., 8.
  11. Hofer M.A. (2014). The emerging synthesis of development and evolution. A new biology for psychoanalysis. Neuropsychoanalysis, 16, 1: 3-22., DOI: 10.1080/15294145.2014.90102
  12. Hyphantis T., Almyroudi A., Paika V., Goulia P., Arvanitakis K. (2009). Narcissistic rage: The Achilles’ heel of the patient with chronic physical illness. Patient Prefer Adherence, 3: 239-250.
  13. Kandel E. (1999). Biology and the future of psychoanalysis: a new intellectual framework for psychoanalysis revisited. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156: 505-524.
  14. Kaplan Solms K., Solms M. (2000). Clinical studies in neuro-psychoanalysis. London: Karnac books., DOI: 10.4324/9780429472992-
  15. Kehyayan A., Best K., Schmeing J.B., Axmacher N., Kessler H. (2013). Neural activity during free association to conflict-related sentences. Front Hum Neurosci, 25, 7: 705.
  16. Kehyayan A., Matura N., Klein K., Schmidt A.C., Herpertz S., Axmacher N., Kessler H. (2018). Putative Markers of Repression in Patients Suffering from Mental Disorders. Front Psychol., 69: 2109.
  17. Kessler H., Schmidt A.C., Hildenbrand O., Scharf D., Kehyayan A., Axmacher N. (2017). Investigating Behavioral and Psychophysiological Reactions to Conflict-Related and Individualized Stimuli as Potential Correlates of Repression, Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1511.
  18. Mancia M. (2006). Psychoanalysis and neurosciences. Milano: Springer Verlag., DOI: 10.1007/88-470-0550-
  19. Rizzolatti G., Semi A., Fabbri-Destro M. (2014). Linking psychoanalysis with neuroscience: the concept of ego. Neuropsychologia, 55: 143-148.
  20. Schmeing, J.B., Kehyayan A., Kessler H., Do Lam A.T., Fell J., Schmidt A. C., Axmacher N. (2013). Can the neural basis of repression be studied in the MRI scanner? New insights from two free association paradigms. Plos One, 8: e62358.
  21. Semenza C., Costantini M.V., Mariani F. (2000). Memorie, Cognitivismo e Psicoanalisi. Psiche, 2: 209-220.
  22. Semenza C. (2001a). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Neuropsychology:theoretical and methodological affinities. Neuropsychoanalysis, 3: 3-10., DOI: 10.1080/15294145.2001.1077332
  23. Semenza C. (2001b). Memorie multiple: suggerimenti dalla neuropsicologia. In: Pierri M. (a cura di). Qui e ora…con me. Aperture psicoanalitiche all’esperienza contemporanea. Torino: Boringhieri, pp. 198-208.
  24. Semenza C. (2004) Unconscious how? Neuropsychoanalysis, 6, 1: 87-91., DOI: 10.1080/15294145.2004.1077344
  25. Semenza C., Costantini M.V., Mariani F. (2005). Types of memory in psychoanalysis. In: Minkovitz H. (Ed.). Neuroscientific and Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Memory. International Neuro-Psychoanalysis Congress Proceedings. The International Neuro-Psychoanalysis Centre, London, pp. 133-140.
  26. Semenza C. (2010a). Neuropsicoanalisi. Il sogno di Freud fatto realtà? Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 37, 1: 35-45.
  27. Semenza C. (2010b). Neuropsicoanalisi: un percorso procrastinato. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 37, 1: 121-124.
  28. Semenza C., Vivenzi D. (2016). The psychoanalyst’s mind at work. Testing the episodic buffer: a pilot study. Neuropsychoanalysis, 18, 1: 45-52., DOI: 10.1080/15294145.2016.115182
  29. Semenza C. (2017). The unconscious in cognitive science. A few suggestions for psychoanalysis. In: Leuzinger-Bohleber M., Arnold S., Solms M. (eds.). The Unconscious. A bridge between psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 93-112.
  30. Solms M. (2006). Le neuroscienze. In: Pearson E.S., Cooper A.S., Gabbard O.G. (a cura di). Psicoanalisi. Teoria, clinica, ricerca. Milano: Cortina.
  31. Yovell Y., Solms M., Fotopoulou A. (2015). The case for neuropsychoanalysis: Why a dialogue with neuroscience is necessary but not sufficient for psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal, 96(6): 1515-53., DOI: 10.1111/1745-8315.1233

Carlo Semenza, Neurosciences and psychoanalysis: a dialogue without vanitas? in "PSICOTERAPIA PSICOANALITICA" 1/2019, pp. 115-127, DOI:10.3280/PSP2019-001008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content