Click here to download

An exploratory study on the construction of networks in social farming
Journal Title: ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE 
Author/s: Patrizia Borsotto, Marco Gaito , Antonio Papaleo, Carmela De Vivo 
Year:  2019 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  26 Pg. 481-506 FullText PDF:  248 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ECAG2019-002015
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Social farming is a complex activity that requires, for its development, the contribution of different skills and competences and, therefore, the creation of networks and complex relationships among several actors. According to the Report on Social Farming (rrn, 2017), networks that are built around social agriculture are complex both in terms of agreements and of the plurality of stakeholders involved. The paper aims at presenting the results of the research activity carried out on a group of Italian social farming operators that participated in information and training activities organized by the Italian National Rural Network (nrn) (summer schools and/or study visits) between 2016 and 2018. Aim of the research is to understand the relationships that have been created after participating in these moments and how much these activities improved the strengthening or the creation of territorial networks. The survey was conducted with qualitative methods and the tools used are the interview by questionnaire and social network analysis. All participants at the end of the events were invited to respond to a questionnaire aimed at identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the activity and subsequently they were given a questionnaire with cawi methodology aimed at understanding the social farming activities developed after the training. Then a sample of respondents was selected, among those who started new projects or implemented the existing ones. At this stage, data were gathered from an in-depth questionnaire and direct interview. Through the application of Social Network Analysis (sna) the formal and informal links between the participants have been mapped and described. The analysis of the actors has highlighted the high heterogeneity of the subjects involved, which in most cases is constituted by farmers. The network is not very cohesive due to the lack of links between many actors. However, it is an active and inclusive network characterized by redundant links that may be poorly efficient and an obstacle to its further expansion. Within the network, there are actors who simultaneously hold multiple roles representing multiple interests; the nrn no longer appears as a standalone unit that only performs an "institutional function" but as a social subject.
Keywords: Social farming, social innovation, connective agriculture, network.
Jel Code: O35, D85, L14

  1. crea-pb (2017). Rapporto sull’agricoltura sociale in Italia. National Rural Network. Creswell, J.W., & Maietta, R.C. (2002). Qualitative research. In Miller, D.C.,
  2. Acciani, C., De Boni, A., Fucilli, V., & Roma, R. (2009). L’organizzazione dei sistemi di produzione secondo la teoria dei networks: il caso dell’Alto Salento, Economia Agro-Alimentare, 11(2), 41-46., DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2009-003001
  3. Albanese, A., Dara Guccione G., Schifani, G., & Varia, F. (2012). Un’applicazione della Social Network Analysis alla rete di relazioni di un Gruppo d’Acquisto Solidale: l’esperienza di Gasualmente. Proceedings of V Workshop GRAB-IT “Agricoltura biologica: modello sostenibile per un Mediterraneo in transizione”, Ancona, 10-11 maggio, 2012.
  4. Ascani, M., & De Vivo, C. (2016). L’agricoltura sociale nei Programmi di Sviluppo Rurale 2014-2020: quali opportunita. Agriregionieuropa, 12(45).
  5. Bassi, I., Nassivera F., & Piani, L. (2016). Social farming: a proposal to explore the effects of structural and relational variables on social farm results. Agricultural and Food Economics, 4:13.
  6. Bock, B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), 552-573.
  7. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L.C. (2002a). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  8. Borgatti, S.P. (2002b). NetDraw Software for Network Visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
  9. Bosnjak, M., Neubarth, W., Couper, M.P., Bandilla, W., & Kaczmire, L. (2008). Prenotification in Web-based access panel surveys – The influence of mobile text messaging versus e-mail on response rates and sample composition. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 213-223., DOI: 10.1177/0894439307305895
  10. Salkind, N.J. (eds.). Handbook of research design and social measurement. 6th Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  11. Cristini, L., Licciardo, F., & Mappa, O. (2012). L’analisi delle reti sociali nella valutazione dei Psr. Un’applicazione della Social network analysis per lo studio delle reti create dai Gal nel Psr Liguria. Agriregionieuropa, 8(31), 1-8.
  12. Dell’Olio, M., Hassink, J., & Vaandrager, L. (2017). The development of social farming in Italy: A qualitative inquiry across four regions. Journal of Rural Studies, 56(1), 65-75.
  13. De Vivo, C., Ascani, M., & Gaito, M. (2017). Social Farming and inclusion in EU ESI Funds programming. Ist joint conference SIDEA-SIEA “Strategie cooperative e creazione del valore in una filiera alimentare sostenibile”, September 2017, Bisceglie, Italy.
  14. De Vivo, C., Ascani, M., & Cacciola, S. (2018). Il budget di salute come nuovo strumento di welfare. XXXIX Italian Conference of Scienze Regionali, September 2018, Bolzano, Italy.
  15. Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R., & Rossignoli, C. M. (2017). Collaboration, knowledge and innovation toward a welfare society: the case of the Board of Social Farming in Valdera (Tuscany), Italy. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23(4), 289-311., DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1302889.
  16. European Commission (2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy (cap Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (eagf) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (eafrd) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Bruxelles, 1.6.2018 COM(2018) 392 final.
  17. Fabiani, G. (2014). L’agricoltura che cambia. Dalla grande crisi alla globalizzazione. QA Rivista dell’Associazione Rossi-Doria, 23(1), 7-30., DOI: 10.3280/QU2014-001001
  18. Falkowski, J., Lopaciuk, B., & Chlebicka A. (2017). Social relationships and governing collaborative actions in rural areas: Some evidence from agricultural producer groups in Poland. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 104-116.
  19. Foti, V.T., Rizzo, M., & Giudice, V.L. (2014). Relationship system analysis in social farming: the role of ‘Sicilian Social Farm Network’. Quality – Access to Success, 15, 62-68.
  20. Garcia-Llorente, M., Rossignoli, C.M., Di Iacovo, F., & Moruzzo, R. (2016). Social Farming in the Promotion of Socio-Ecological Sustainability in Rural and Periurban Areas. Sustainability, 8(12), 1-15.
  21. Garcia-Llorente, M., Rubio-Olivar, R., & Gutierrez-Briceno, I. (2018). Farming for Life Quality and Sustainability: A Literature Review of Green Care Research Trends in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6).
  22. Giare, F., Caggiano, M., & Vignali, F. (2009). Vite contadine – storie dal mondo agricolo e rurale. Roma: Inea.
  23. Giare, F., De Vivo, C., Ascani, M., Muscas, F. (2018). L’agricoltura sociale: un modello di welfare generativo. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 73, 125-146., DOI: 10.13128/REA-24079
  24. Granovetter, M.S. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties, The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380., DOI: 10.1086/225469
  25. Hassink, J., Elings, M, Zweekhorst, M, van den Nieuwenhuizen, N, & Smit (2010). Care farms in the Netherlands: Attractive empowerment-oriented and strengthsbased practices in the community. Health & Place, 16(3), 423-430.
  26. Henke, R., & Salvioni, C. (2008). La multifunzionalita in agricoltura: dal postproduttivismo all’azienda rurale. In Aguglia, L., Henke, R., Salvioni, C. Agricoltura multifunzionale. Comportamenti e strategie imprenditoriali alla ricerca della diversificazione. Inea, Studi & Ricerche, 9-23.
  27. Napoli: esi. Lanfranchi, M., Giannetto, C., Abbate, T., & Dimitrova, V. (2015). Agriculture and the social farm: expression of the multifunctional model of agriculture as a solution to the economic crisis in rural areas. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 21(4), 711-718.
  28. Laws, S., Harper, C., Jones, M., & Marcus, R. (2013). Research for development, a practical guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  29. Maino, F. (2014). L’innovazione sociale nell’Unione Europea: uno stimolo per il rinnovamento del welfare. Quaderni di Economia Sociale, 2, 36-42.
  30. Scuderi, A., Timpanaro, G., & Cacciola, S. (2014). Development policies for social farming in the EU-2020 Strategy. Quality – Access to Success, 15(139), 76-82.
  31. Senni, S. (2010). Agricoltura e imprenditorialita sociale nell’esperienza italiana. Impresa sociale, 4.
  32. Senni, S. (2013). Uno sguardo europeo sull’agricoltura sociale. Il parere del Comitato Economico e Sociale Europeo. Agriregionieuropa, 9(32).
  33. Shortall, S, & Warner, M.E. (2010). Social inclusion or Market Competitiveness? A Comparison of Rural Development Policies in the European Union and the United States. Social Policy & Administration, 44(5), 575-597.
  34. Steigen, A.M., Kogstad, R., & Hummelvoll J.K. (2016). Green Care Services in the Nordic countries: an integrative literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 19(5), 692-715., DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1082983
  35. Trobia, A., & Milia, V. (2011). Social Network Analysis. Approcci, tecniche e nuove applicazioni. Roma: Carrocci editore.
  36. Van Huylenbroeck, G. e Durand, G. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: a general framework. Multifunctional agriculture. A new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development. Ashgate, 1-18.
  37. Van der Ploeg, J.D. (2008). The new peasantries: struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of Empire and Globalization. London, Sterling: Earthscan.
  38. Ventura, F., & Milone, P. (2004). Novelty as Redefinition of Farm Boundaries. In Wiskerke, J.S.C., & Ploeg, J.D. van der (eds.). Seeds of Transition. Essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture (European Perspectives on Rural Development). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 54-92.
  39. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Weimiao, F., & Zheng, Y. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Journal Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132-139.
  41. Yin, K.R. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6e eds. Newbury Park, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Patrizia Borsotto, Marco Gaito , Antonio Papaleo, Carmela De Vivo, in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2019, pp. 481-506, DOI:10.3280/ECAG2019-002015

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content