Click here to download

Framing the debate on the Global and Transnational Social Protection. Introduction
Journal Title: MONDI MIGRANTI 
Author/s: Simone Castellani, Francesca Lagomarsino 
Year:  2019 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 27-42 FullText PDF:  196 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MM2019-003002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The Welfare State, consolidated along the XX century as the model of social pro-tection within the neo-liberal societies, has been increasingly questioned. The last economic recession has contributed to a further deterioration of Welfare State and social risks have become stronger for a growing part of population. Particularly, many migrants remain on the edges of the traditional social protection systems because of their job status or their residence/citizenship status. Reflecting on these premises, some scholars stress the need of thinking about a configuration of social protection that crosses the national borders and propose to analyse how people who live transnationally are restructuring their protection in order to face social risks. This Special Issue aims to introduce the debate on the Global and Transna-tional Social Protection within the Italian migration studies. It starts from the state of the art and give example of original empirical studies carried out in this scien-tific line in Italy, Spain, Austria and UK.
Keywords: Transnational social protection; welfare state; transnational migration networks; resource environment; bricolage.

  1. Amelina A., Bilecen B., Barglowski K. e Faist, T. (2012). Ties That Protect ? The Significance of Transnationality for the Distribution of Informal Social Protection in Migrant Networks. SFB 882 Working Paper Series 6. Bielefeld -- https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2542199/2542200/SFB_882_WP_0006_Amelina_Bilecen_Barglowski_Faist.pdf (data consultazione 13/08/2019).
  2. Ambrosini M. (2015). Ngos and Health Services for Irregular Immigrants in Italy: When the Protection of Human Rights Challenges the Laws. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13, 2: 116-134;, 10.1080/15562948.2015.1017631DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1017631
  3. Anderson B. (2000). Doing the Dirty Work. The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London and New York: Zed books.
  4. Avato J., Koettl J. e Sabates-Wheeler R. (2010). Social security regimes, global estimates, and good practices: the status of social protection for international migrants. World Development, 38, 4: 455-466;
  5. Baldassar L. e Merla L. (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care : understanding mobility and absence in family life. London and New York: Routledge.
  6. Barglowski K. e Pustulka P. (2018). Tightening early childcare choices – gender and social class inequalities among Polish mothers in Germany and the uk. Comparative Migration Studies 6, 1, SpringerOpen: 36;
  7. Barrett A. e Maître B. (2013). Immigrant Welfare receipt across Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 34, 1: 8-23;, 10.1108/01437721311319629DOI: 10.1108/01437721311319629
  8. Bilecen B. (2019). ‘Altın Günü’: migrant women’s social protection networks. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1, SpringerOpen: 11;
  9. Bilecen B. e Barglowski K. (2015). On the Assemblages of Informal and Formal Transnational Social Protection. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 203-214;
  10. Bilecen B. e Sienkiewicz J.J. (2015). Informal Social Protection Networks of Transnational Social Spaces. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 227-243;
  11. Bimbi F. (1999). The Family Paradigm in the Italian Welfare State (1947-1996). South European Society and Politics 4, 2: 72-88;, 10.1080/13608740408539571DOI: 10.1080/13608740408539571
  12. Boccagni P. (2016). Addressing transnational needs through migration? An inquiry into the reach and consequences of migrants’ social protection across borders, Global Social Policy, 17:168- 187;, 10.1177/1468018116678523DOI: 10.1177/1468018116678523
  13. Boccagni P. (2015). Burden, blessing or both? On the mixed role of transational ties in migrant informal social support, International Sociology, 30, 3: 250-268;, 10.1177/0268580915570508DOI: 10.1177/0268580915570508
  14. Boccagni P. (2014). Caring about migrant care workers : from private obligations to transnational social Welfare ? Critical Social Policy, 34, 2: 221-240:;, 10.1177/0261018313500867DOI: 10.1177/0261018313500867
  15. Bourguignon F. (2015). The Globalization of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Cap P. (2017). Immigration and Anti-migration Discourses: The Early Rhetoric of Brexit. In: Cap P., editor, The Language of Fear (pp. 67-79). London: Palgrave Macmillan uk;, 10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1_6DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1_6
  17. Castles S. (2007). Comparing the experience of five major emigration contries. In: Castles S. and Wise R., eds., Migration and development: perspectives from the South. Geneva: Oim.
  18. Castellani S. e Martín-Díaz E. (2019). Re-writing the domestic role: transnational migrants’ households between informal and formal social protection in Ecuador and in Spain. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1. SpringerOpen: 7;
  19. Daly M. e Lewis J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary Welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology , 51, 2: 281-298;
  20. De Haas H. (2010). Migration and development : a teorethical perspective, International Migration Review, 44, 1: 227-264;
  21. De Haas H. (2005). Remittances, migrationand social development. A conceptual review of the literarure, Paper 34, Ginevra, Unrisd.
  22. Dobbs E., Levitt P., Parella S. and Petroff A. (2019). Social Welfare grey zones: how and why subnational actors provide when nations do not? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45, 9: 1595-1612;, 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1432343DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1432343
  23. Eesc (2013). The impact of anti-crisis measures and the social and employment situation. Brussels: Eesc.
  24. Elson D. (1994). Micro, Meso, Macro: Gender and Economic Analysis in the Context of Policy Reform. In: Bakker I, editor, The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy (pp. 33-45). London: Zed books and South/North Institute.
  25. Faist T. (2019). The Transnationalized Social Question. Migration and the Politics of Social Inequalities in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Faist T. (2014). On the transnational social question: How social inequalities are reproduced in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 24, 3: 207-222;, 10.1177/0958928714525814DOI: 10.1177/0958928714525814
  27. Faist T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 2: 189-222;, 10.1080/014198700329024DOI: 10.1080/014198700329024
  28. Faist T. e Bilecen B. (2015). Social Inequalities Through the Lens of Social Protection: Notes on the Transnational Social Question. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 282-293;
  29. Ferrera M. (1996). The ’southern model’ of Welfare in social europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 1: 17-37;, 10.1177/095892879600600102DOI: 10.1177/095892879600600102
  30. Folbre N. (2006). Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy. Journal of Human Development, 7, 2: 183-199;, 10.1080/14649880600768512DOI: 10.1080/14649880600768512
  31. Ghimis A., Lazarowicz A. e Pascouau Y. (2014). Stigmatisation of eu mobile citizens : a ticking time bomb for the European project. Brussels- https://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_4096_stigmatisation_of_eu_mobile_citizens.pdf. (Data consultazione 13/08/2019).
  32. Gimenéz C. (2004). Que es el codesarrollo? Expectativas, concepciones y escenarios de futuro. Madrid: Cecod.
  33. Godin M. (2019). Far from a Burden: eu Migrants as Pioneers of a European Social Protection System from Below. International Migration. on-line first;
  34. Goldschmidt T. (2015). Anti-Immigrant Sentiment and Majority Support for Three Types of Welfare. European Societies 17, 5: 620-652;, 10.1080/14616696.2015.1088959DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2015.1088959
  35. Habermas J. (1996). Citizenship and National Identity. In: Habermas J., ed., In Between Facts and Norm (pp. 491-515). Cambridge (ma): Mit Press.
  36. Herrera G. (2013). “Lejos de tus pupilas”: Familias transnacionales, cuidados y desigualdad social en Ecuador. Quito: Flacso Ecuador.
  37. Hochschild A.R. (2001). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In: Hutton W. and Giddens A., eds., On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130-146). London: Johnatan Cape;, 10.4324/9781315633794DOI: 10.4324/9781315633794
  38. Hooijer G. e Picot G. (2015). European Welfare States and Migrant Poverty: The Institutional Determinants of Disadvantage. Comparative Political Studies 48, 14: 1879-1904;, 10.1177/0010414015597508DOI: 10.1177/0010414015597508
  39. Kofman E. (2003). The economic and social aspects of migration. Women migrants and refugiees in the European Union. Brussels: Ocde.
  40. Kofman E. e Raghhuram P. (2015). Gendered Migrations and Global Social Reproduction. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  41. Lafleur J-M. e Mescoli E. (2018). Creating Undocumented eu Migrants through Welfare: A Conceptualization of Undeserving and Precarious Citizenship. Sociology, 52, 3: 480-496;, 10.1177/0038038518764615DOI: 10.1177/0038038518764615
  42. Lafleur J-M. e Stanek M. (2017). Restrictions on Access to Social Protection by New Southern European Migrants in Belgium. In: Lafleur J-M. and Stanek M., eds., South-North Migration of eu Citizens in Times of Crisis (pp. 99-121). Amsterdam: Imiscoe & Springer;, 10.1007/978-3-319-39763-4DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39763-4
  43. Lafleur J-M. e Vivas Romero M. (2018). Combining transnational and intersectional approaches to immigrants’ social protection: The case of Andean families’ access to health. Comparative Migration Studies, 6, 1, SpringerOpen: 14;
  44. Lagomarsino F. (2006). Esodi e approdi di genere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  45. Lecerf M. (2016). Poverty in the European Union The crisis and its aftermath. Brussels: European Parlament.
  46. Levitt P., Viterna J., Lloyd C. e Mueller A. (2017). Transnational Social Protection: Setting the Agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 45, 1: 2-19.
  47. Lillie N. e Simola A. (2016). The Crisis of Free Movement in the European Union. Mondi Migranti, 3: 7-20;, 10.1080/13600818.2016.123970DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2016.123970
  48. Martín Díaz E. (2011). El papel del género en la acumulación de capital social: el caso de las mujeres ecuatorianas. In: Ginieniewicz J., ed., La migración latinoamericana a España: una mirada desde el modelo de acumulación de activos (pp. 109-128). Quito: Flacso Ecuador and Global Urban Research Centre, University of Manchester.
  49. Mahon R. e Sonya M. (2017). Not In Focus: Migrant Women Caregivers As Seen by the Ilo and the Oecd. In: Michel S. and Peng I., eds., Gender, Migration and the Work of Care: A Multi-Scalar Approach to the Pacific Rim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  50. Myles J. e Quadagno J. (2002). Political Theories of the Welfare State. Social Service Review, 76, 1: 34-57;, 10.1086/324607DOI: 10.1086/324607
  51. Offe C. (1984). Contradiction of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
  52. Padilla B. (2013). Saúde dos imigrantes: multidimensionalidade, desigualdades e acessibilidade em Portugal. Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, 21, 40: 49-68.
  53. Pastore F. (2007). Europe, migration and development.Critical remarks on an emerging policy field, Development, 50: 56-62;
  54. Pastore F. (2004). Dobbiamo temere le migrazioni?. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  55. Pedone C. (2005). ‘Tú siempre jalas a los tuyos’. Cadenas y redes migratorias de las familias ecuatorianas hacia España. In: Herrera G., Carrillo M.C. and Torres A., eds. (pp. 105-143), La Migración Ecuatoriana. Transnacionalismo, Redes e Identidades. Quito: Flacso Ecuador.
  56. Pedone C. e Alfaro Y. (2018). La migración cualificada en America latina: una revision de los abordajes teoricos metodologicos y sus desafios, Periplos, vol 2, 3-18;, 10.1787/570061570356DOI: 10.1787/570061570356
  57. Perna R. (2018). Re-bounding eu citizenship from below: practices of healthcare for ‘(Il)legitimate eu Migrants’ in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, 5: 829-848;, 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1362977.DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1362977.
  58. Piperno F. e Tognetti Bordogna M. (2012). Welfare Transnazioanle. La frontiera interna delle politiche sociali. Roma: Ediesse.
  59. Phillimore J., Bradby H., Knecht M., Padilla B. e Pemberton, S. (2019). Bricolage as conceptual tool for understanding access to healthcare in superdiverse populations. Social Theory and Health, 17, 2: 231-252;
  60. Razavi S. e Staab S. (2012). Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care: Worlds Apart. London: Routledge.
  61. Sabates-Wheeler R. (2019). Mapping differential vulnerabilities and rights: ‘opening’ access to social protection for forcibly displaced populations. Comparative Migration Studies , 7, 1. SpringerOpen: 38.
  62. Salazar Parreñas R. (2001). Servants of globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  63. Sayad A. (2002). La doppia assenza. Dalle illusioni dell’emigrato alle sofferenze dell’immigrato. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  64. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2017). Mobile Populations in Immobile Welfare Systems: A Typology of Institutions Providing Social Welfare and Protection Within a Mobility Framework. The European Journal of Development Research 29(4): 787–805.
  65. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2018). Providing social protection to mobile populations: symbiotic relationships between migrants and Welfare institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(13): 2127–2143., 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1429900DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1429900
  66. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2019). Moving for a ‘better Welfare’? The case of transnational Sudanese families. Global Networks 19(2): 139–157.
  67. Titmuss R.M. (1987). The Philosophy of Welfare: Selected Writings of Richard M. Titmuss. Abel-Smith B. and Titimuss K., editors. London: Allen & Unwin.
  68. Vathi Z., Duci V., and Dhembo E. (2019) Social protection and return migration: trans-national and trans-temporal developmental gaps in the Albania-Greece migration corridor. Migration and Development 8, 2. Routledge: 243–263., 10.1080/21632324.2018.1534377DOI: 10.1080/21632324.2018.1534377
  69. Williams F. (2011). The Transnational Political Economy of Care. In Mahon, R. and Robinson, F., eds., The Global Political Economy of Care: Integrating Ethical and Social Politisc (pp. 21-38). Vancouver: Ubc Press.

Simone Castellani, Francesca Lagomarsino, Framing the debate on the Global and Transnational Social Protection. Introduction in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 3/2019, pp. 27-42, DOI:10.3280/MM2019-003002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content