Click here to download

Social services and users coming from Transnational Nation-States: the case of Ecuador in the city of Genova
Journal Title: MONDI MIGRANTI 
Author/s: Agostino Massa 
Year:  2019 Issue: 3 Language: Italian 
Pages:  22 Pg. 63-84 FullText PDF:  215 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MM2019-003004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Drawing from a qualitative research carried out on a sample of social workers of the City of Genova, the article deals with the case in which social services, in the frame of a change of their environment because of the increase of service users with foreign origin, have to set relations with citizens and consular authorities of countries, such as Ecuador, that can be considered as Transnational Nation-States, i.e. countries treating their emigrants as full-fledged citizens, granting them nation-ality, voting right and different forms of support, relying also on a wide diplomatic network. The author is set to outline the forms of development of the relations be-tween local government and its social services, on the one hand, and citizens and the consulate of Ecuador, on the other hand. While at first these relations were marked by conflict, they became then more cooperative, an example of "best practice" aiming to grant the immigrants an access to local welfare services in the receiving country.
Keywords: Political transnationalism; Ecuador; consular authorities; Genova; so-cial services; child protection.

  1. Ambrosini M. e Queirolo Palmas L., a cura di (2005). I latinos alla conquista dell’Europa. Nuove migrazioni e spazi della cittadinanza. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Bagnasco A. (2003). La società fuori squadra. Come cambia l’organizzazione sociale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Barberis E. e Boccagni P. (2017). Il lavoro sociale con le persone immigrate. Strumenti per la formazione e la pratica interculturale nei servizi. Rimini: Maggioli.
  4. Bauböck R. (2003). Towards a Political Theory of Migrant Transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37, 3: 700-723;
  5. Bauböck R. (2007). Stakeholder Citizenship and Transnational Political Participation: A Normative Evaluation of External Voting. Fordham Law Review, 75: 2393-2447.
  6. Beneduce R. (2007). Bambini e adolescenti in transito tra culture. In: Tognetti Bordogna M., a cura di, Arrivare non basta. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  7. Bilecen B. e Barglowski K. (2015). On the Assemblages of Informal and Formal Transnational Social Protection. Population, Space and Place, 21: 203-214;
  8. Boccagni P. (2017). Addressing transnational needs through migration? An inquiry into the reach and consequences of migrants’ social protection across border. Global Social Policy, 17, 2: 168-187;, DOI: 10.1177/10.1468018116678523
  9. Boccagni P. (2014). Making the “Fifth Region” a real place? Emigrant policies and the emigration-nation nexus in Ecuador. National Identities, 16, 2: 117-137;, DOI: 10.1080/14608944.2014.897317
  10. Boccagni P. (2013). “Whom Should We Help First?” Transnational Helping Practices in Ecuadorian Migration. International Migration, 51, 2: 191-208;
  11. Boccagni P. (2011). Migrants’ social protection as a transnational process: public policies and emigrant initiative in the case of Ecuador. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 3: 318-325;
  12. Boccagni P. (2008). Votare per sentirsi a casa. Il transnazionalismo politico fra gli immigrati ecuadoriani in Italia. Polis, 22, 1: 35-56;, DOI: 10.1424/26723
  13. Boccagni P., Lafleur J.-M. e Levitt P. (2016). Transnational politics as cultural circulation: Towards a conceptual under standing of migrant political participation on the move. Mobilities, 11, 3: 444-463;, DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2014.1000023
  14. Boccagni P. e Ramírez J. (2013). Building Democracy or Reproducing ‘Ecuadoreanness’? A Transnational Exploration of Ecuadorean Migrants’ External Voting. Journal of Latin American Studies, 45, 4: 721-750;, DOI: 10.1017/S0022216X13001181
  15. Cappello F. (2017). Child protection e minoranze etniche nei servizi sociali territoriali. La percezione degli assistenti sociali in uno studio nell’area genovese. La Rivista di Servizio Sociale, 2: 72-79.
  16. Castles S., De Haas H. e Miller M. (2014). The Age of Migration International population movements in the Modern World. New York: Guilford Press. (5th ed).
  17. Corbetta P. (2015). La ricerca sociale: metodologia e tecniche. vol. III. Le tecniche qualitative. Bologna: il Mulino (seconda edizione).
  18. Delano A. (2011). Mexico And Its Diaspora in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Dobbs E. e Levitt P. (2017). The missing link? The role of sub-national governance in transnational social protections. Oxford Development Studies, 45, 1: 47-63.
  20. Folgheraiter F. (2007). La logica sociale dell’aiuto. Trento: Erickson.
  21. Glick Schiller N., Basch L. e Blanc-Szanton C. (1992). Transnationalism: A New Analytic Framework for Understanding Migration. The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645: 1-24;
  22. Glick Schiller N. e Fouron G. (2001). Georges Woke Up Laughing: Long Distance Nationalism and the Search for Home, Durham (nc): Duke University Press.
  23. Guarnizo L.E., Portes A. e Haller W. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 6: 1211-1248;, DOI: 10.1086/375195
  24. Held D. e McGrew A. (2003). The Great Globalization Debate: An Introduction. In: Held D. e McGrew A., a cura di, The Global Transformations Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  25. Itzigsohn J. (2012). A ‘Transnational Nation’? Migration and the Boundaries of Belonging. In: Lyons T. e Mandaville P., a cura di, Politics from Afar. New York: Columbia University Press.
  26. Itzigsohn J. e Villacrés D. (2008). Migrant Political Transnationalism and the Practice of Democracy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 4: 664-686;, DOI: 10.1080/01419870701784497
  27. Kriz K. e Skivenes M. (2010). “Knowing Our Society” and “Fighting Against Prejudices”: How Child Welfare Workers in Norway and England Perceive the Challenges of Minority Parents. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 8: 2634-2651;
  28. Lagomarsino F. (2006). Esodi e approdi di genere. Famiglie transnazionali e nuove migrazioni dall’Ecuador. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  29. Lagomarsino F. e Castellani S. (2016). The unseen protagonists. Ecuadorians’ daughters between Ecuador and Southern Europe. Social Identities, 22, 3: 291-306;, DOI: 10.1080/13504630.2015.1128813
  30. Lagomarsino F. e Pagnotta C. (2012). Sull’alterità dei giovani latinoamericani. Sessualità adolescente a Genova. In: Ambrosini M. e Torre A.T., a cura di, Settimo Rapporto sull’immigrazione a Genova. Genova: Il Melangolo.
  31. Levitt P. (2001). The Transnational Villagers. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  32. Levitt P., Viterna J., Mueller A. e Lloyd C. (2017). Transnational social protection: setting the agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 45, 1: 2-19;, DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2016.1239702
  33. Lipsky M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.
  34. Massa A. (2018). Integrazione delle famiglie appartenenti a minoranze etniche. StudiZancan, 17, 1: 34-40.
  35. Massa A. (2017). La relazione con utenti di minoranze etniche nella percezione degli operatori dei servizi sociali. Uno studio nell’area Genovese. Lavoro Sociale, 17, (suppl. al n. 4): 45-59;, DOI: 10.14605/LS40
  36. Massa A. (2015). Organizzazione e funzionamento del decentramento comunale. I servizi alla persona nei Municipi del Comune di Genova. Roma: Aracne.
  37. Pedone C. (2018). Madres ecuatorianas bajo la lupa del Estado italiano: miradas discriminatorias de las relaciones de género y relacionales de las familias migrantes. In: Tamanini M., Heidemann F.G., Portes Vargas E. e Castro de Araújo S.M., org., O cuidado em cena: desafios políticos, teóricos e práticos. Florianópolis: Udesc.
  38. Portes A., Guarnizo L.E. e Landolt P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 2: 217-237;, DOI: 10.1080/014198799329468
  39. Queirolo Palmas L. e Torre A.T., a cura di (2005). Il fantasma delle bande. Genova e i Latinos. Genova: Fratelli Frilli Editori.
  40. Sala E. (2010). L’intervista. In: De Lillo A., a cura di, Il mondo della ricerca qualitativa. Novara: Utet.
  41. Smith R.C. (2008). Contradictions of Diasporic Institutionalization in Mexican Politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 4: 708-741;, DOI: 10.1080/014198707071785528
  42. Spinelli E. (2005). Immigrazione e servizio sociale. Conoscenze e competenze dell’assistenza sociale. Roma: Carocci.
  43. Thomas W.I. e Thomas D.S. (1928). The Child in America. Behavior problems and programs. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Agostino Massa, Social services and users coming from Transnational Nation-States: the case of Ecuador in the city of Genova in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 3/2019, pp. 63-84, DOI:10.3280/MM2019-003004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content