Click here to download

Icts overuse in the European educational space. Interpreting the Icts overdose on learning outcomes
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE  
Author/s: Orazio Giancola, Luca Salmieri 
Year:  2020 Issue: 121 Language: English 
Pages:  20 Pg. 114-133 FullText PDF:  226 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SR2020-121006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The paper is structured as follows: first, a brief survey of the literature relating to Icts and their impact on education performance is presented. The methodology is then established, and the specifications of the models are defined in order to present data analyses on the impacts of different uses of Icts on Pisa scores in Reading, Mathematics and Science for 15 European countries. The following sections outline the results of descriptive, comparative and statistical analyses and present partial correlation coefficients in order to assess the impact of Icts on educational performance. The final section provides concluding remarks and some policy implications.

  1. J. Attewell (2017), Technical Advice for School Leaders and IT Administrators, Brussels, European Schoolnet.
  2. J. Attewell, C. Savill-Smith, R. Douch (2009), The Impact of Mobile Learning: Examining what it means for Teaching and Learning, London, Learning and Skills Network.
  3. A. Balanskat, R. Blamire, S. Kefala (2006), The Ict Impact Report: A Review of Studies of Ict Impact on Schools in Europe, Brussels, European Schoolnet.
  4. G. Beauchamp, S. Kennewell (2010), «Interactivity in the Classroom and Its Impact on Learning», Computers & Education, 54, pp. 759-66.
  5. P. Belley, L. Lochner (2007), «The Changing Role of Family Income and Ability in Determining Educational Achievement», Journal of Human Capital, 1, 1, pp. 37-89,, DOI: 10.1086/524674
  6. F. Biagi, M. Loi (2013), «Measuring Ict Use and Learning Outcomes: Evidence from Recent Econometric Studies», European Journal of Education, 48, 1, pp. 28-42,
  7. R. Bolstad (2004), The Role and Potential of Ict in Early Childhood Education: A Review of New Zealand and International Literature, Wellington, Ministry of Education.
  8. P. Bourdieu (1986), The Forms of Capital, in J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, Greenwood Press.
  9. P. Bourdieu, J.C. Passeron (1970), La reproduction: Éléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement, Paris, Éd. de Minuit.
  10. G. Brunello, M. De Paola (2017), School Segregation of Immigrants and Its Effects on Educational Outcomes in Europe – Publications Office of the EU, European Commission,, DOI: 10.2766/045520.
  11. E. Bukodi, R. Erikson, J.H. Goldthorpe (2014), «The Effects of Social Origins and Cognitive Ability on Educational Attainment: Evidence from Britain and Sweden», Acta Sociologica, 57, 4, pp. 293-310,, DOI: 10.1177/0001699314543803
  12. G. Bulman, R.W. Fairlie (2016), «Technology and Education: Computers, Software, and the Internet», in E.A. Hanushek, S. Machin, L. Woessmann (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, North Holland, Elsevier, vol. 5.
  13. J.P. Byrnes, D.C. Miller (2007), «The Relative Importance of Predictors of Math and Science Achievement: An Opportunity-propensity Analysis», Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 4, pp. 599-629.
  14. B. Collis, J. Moonen (2012), Flexible Learning in a Digital World: Experiences and Expecta-tions, London, Routledge.
  15. M.J. Cox, G. Marshall (2007), «Effects of Ict: Do we know what we should know?», Education and Information Technologies, 12, 2, pp. 59-70.
  16. J. Croizet, T. Claire (1998), «Extending the Concept of Stereotype Threat to Social Class: The Intellectual Underperformance of Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds», Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 6, pp. 588-94,
  17. L. Czerniewicz, C. Brown (2013), «The Habitus of Digital “Strangers” in Higher Education», British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 1, pp. 44-53,
  18. P.E. Davis-Kean (2005), «The Influence of Parent Education and Family Income on Child Achievement: The Indirect Role of Parental Expectations and the Home Environment», Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 2, pp. 294-304.
  19. C. Dede (2010), Comparing Frameworks for 21st Century Skills, in J. Bellanca, R. Brandt (eds.), 21st Century Skills: Rethinking how Students learn, Bloomington (IN), Solution Tree Press.
  20. T. DiPrete, G. Eirich (2006), «Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments», Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 1, pp. 271-97,
  21. R. Erikson, J.H. Goldthorpe, M. Jackson, D.R. Cox (2005), «On Class Differentials in Educational Attainment», Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 27, pp. 9730-3,
  22. European Commission (2013), Survey of Schools: Ict in Education Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools, Brussels, European Schoolnet.
  23. European Commission (2017a), Digital Education Policies in Europe and beyond: Key Design Principles for More Effective Policies, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  24. European Commission (2017b), School Development and Excellent Teaching for a Great Start in Life, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the committee of the Regions, Swd (2017) 165 final, Brussels, European Commission.
  25. European Commission (2019a), 2nd Survey of Schools: Ict in Education Objective 1: Benchmark progress in Ict in Schools, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  26. European Commission (2019b), 2nd Survey of Schools: Ict in Education – Objective 2: Model for a «Highly Equipped and Connected Classroom», Luxembourg: European Commission.
  27. R.W. Fairlie, A. Kalil (2017), «The Effects of Computers on Children’s Social Development and School Participation: Evidence from a Randomized Control Experiment», Economics of Education Review, 57, pp. 10-19.
  28. O. Falck, C. Mang, L. Woessmann (2018), «Virtually no Effect? Different Uses of Classroom Computers and Their Effect on Student Achievement», Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80, 1, pp. 1-38,
  29. J. Fraillon, J. Ainley, W. Schulz, T. Friedman, E. Gebhardt (2014), Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The Iea International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report, Heidelberg, New York Dordrecht, London, Springer.
  30. T. Fuchs, L. Woessmann (2004), Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School, Munich, CESifo GmbH.
  31. T. Fuchs, L. Woessmann (2007), «What Accounts for International Differences in Student Performance? A Re-examination using Pisa Data», Empirical Economics, 32, 2, pp. 433-64.
  32. T. Gerosa, M. Gui (2018), «Dall’esclusione digitale al sovrautilizzo: origini sociali, pervasività dello smartphone e rendimenti scolastici», Polis, 32, 3, pp. 341-70;, DOI: 10.1424/91424
  33. O. Giancola, E. Grimaldi, R. Romito (2019), « La digitalizzazione della scuola. Temi, teorie e metodi di ricerca», Scuola democratica, 3, pp. 461-79,, DOI: 10.12828/95944
  34. O. Giancola, L. Salmieri (2018), «Education and the Inclusion of Immigrants. A Cross-National Analysis among Five European Countries», Scuola democratica, 2, pp. 310-34,, DOI: 10.12828/90564
  35. J. Gil-Flores, J. Rodríguez-Santero, J. Torres-Gordillo (2017), «Factors that explain the Use of Ict in Secondary-education Classrooms: The Role of Teacher Characteristics and School Infrastructure», Computers in Human Behavior, 68, pp. 441-49,
  36. L. Grant (2009), Children’s Role in Home-school Relationships and the Role of Digital Technologies: A Literature Review, Bristol, Futurelab.
  37. L.J. Hadlington (2015), «Cognitive Failures in Daily Life: Exploring the Link with Internet Addiction and Problematic Mobile Phone Use», Computers in Human Behavior, 51, pp. 75-81,
  38. E.A. Hanushek, S. Machin, L. Woessmann (2011), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Amsterdam, North Holland.
  39. E.A. Hanushek, L. Woessmann (2011), «The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement», in E.A. Hanushek, S. Machin, L. Woessmann (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Amsterdam, North Holland.
  40. I. Heemskerk, E. Kuiper, J. Meijer (2014), «Interactive Whiteboard and Virtual Learning Environment Combined: Effects on Mathematics Education», Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 5, pp. 465-78;
  41. E.J. Helsper (2010), «Gendered Internet Use across Generations and Life Stages», Communication Research, 37, 3, pp. 352-74.
  42. S.A. Hunley, J. Krise, T. Rich, C. Schell (2005), «Adolescent Computer Use and Academic Achievement», Adolescence, 40, 158, pp. 308-18.
  43. R. Junco (2012), «The Relationship between Frequency of Facebook Use, Participation in Facebook Activities, and Student Engagement», Computers & Education, 58, 1, pp. 162-71.
  44. V. Kalmus, L. Blinka, K. Olafsson (2015), «Does it matter what Mama says: Evaluating the Role of Parental Mediation in European Adolescents’ Excessive Internet Use», Children & Society, 29, 2, pp. 122-33.
  45. P.A. Kirschner, P. De Bruyckere (2017), «The Myths of the Digital Native and the Multitasker», Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, pp. 135-42.
  46. W. Korte, T. Husing (2006), Benchmarking Access and Use of Ict in European Schools, Bonn, Empirica.
  47. H. Kuhlemeier, H. Bas (2007), «The Impact of Computer Use at home on Students’ Internet Skills», Computers & Education, 49, 2, pp. 460-80,
  48. M. Levels, J. Dronkers, G. Kraaykamp (2008), «Immigrant Children’s Educational Achievement in Western Countries: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects on Mathematical Performance», American Sociological Review, 73, 5, pp. 835-53,, DOI: 10.1177/000312240807300507
  49. P. Linnakyla, A. Malin, K. Taube (2004), «Factors behind Low Reading Literacy Achievement», Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 3, pp. 231-49,, DOI: 10.1080/00313830410001695718
  50. S. Livingstone (2009), Children and the Internet: Great Expectations, Challenging Realities, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  51. S. Livingstone (2012), «Critical Reflections on the Benefits of Ict in Education», Oxford Review of Education, 38, 1, pp. 9-24,, DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2011.577938
  52. A. Luke (2018), Genres of Power: Literacy Education and the Production of Capital, in A. Luke (ed.), Critical Literacy, Schooling, and Social Justice, London, Routledge.
  53. S. Machin, S. McNally, O. Silva (2006), New Technologies in Schools: Is there a Pay off? London: Centre for Economic Performance, Bonn, Institute for the Study of Labour.
  54. G. Mascheroni, J. Vincent (2016), «Perpetual Contact as a Communicative Affordance: Opportunities, Constraints, and Emotions», Mobile Media & Communication, 4, 3, pp. 310-26.
  55. Oecd (2006), Are Students ready for a Technology Rich World? What Pisa Studies tell us, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/4/35995145.pdf.
  56. Oecd (2015), Students, Computers and Learning. Making the Connection, Paris, Oecd Publishing.
  57. Oecd (2018), Equity in Education: Breaking Down Barriers to Social Mobility, Paris, Oecd Publishing,
  58. Oecd (2019), Balancing School Choice and Equity: An International Perspective Based on Pisa, Paris, Oecd Publishing,
  59. V. Pandolfini (2016), «Exploring the Impact of Icts in Education: Controversies and Challenges», Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8, 2, pp.28-53,
  60. D. Passey, C. Rogers, J. Machell, G. McHugh (2004), The Motivational Effect of Ict on Pupils, London, Department for Education and Skills.
  61. W. Pelgrum (2010), «Indicators on Ict in Primary and Secondary Education: Results of an EU Study», in F. Scheuermann, F. Pedró (eds.), Assessing the Effects of Ict in Education, Indicators, Criteria and Benchmarks for International Comparisons, Luxembourg, Publications Offi ce of the European Union,, DOI: 10.2788/27419
  62. F. Pfeffer (2008), «Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and its Institutional Context», European Sociological Review, 24, 5, pp. 543-65,
  63. R. Poli, E. Agrimi (2012), «Internet Addiction Disorder: Prevalence in an Italian Student Population», Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 66, 1, pp. 55-9.
  64. M. Rodrigues, F. Biagi (2017), Digital Technologies and Learning Outcomes of Students from Low Socio-economic Background: An Analysis of Pisa 2015, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union,, DOI: 10.2760/415251
  65. P. Sahlberg (2007), «Education Policies for raising Student Learning: The Finnish Approach», Journal of Education Policy, 22, 2, pp. 147-71,, DOI: 10.1080/02680930601158919
  66. L. Salmieri (2019), «The Rhetoric of Digitalization in Italian Educational Policies: Situating Reception among Digitally Skilled Teachers», Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 11, 1, pp. 162-83,
  67. S.V. Schnepf (2007), «Immigrants’ Educational Disadvantage: An Examination across Ten Countries and Three Surveys», Journal of Population Economics, 20, 3, pp. 527-45;
  68. N. Selwyn, K. Facer (2014), «The Sociology of Education and Digital Technology: Past, Present and Future», Oxford Review of Education, 40, pp. 482-96,
  69. N. Selwyn, J. Potter, S. Cranmer (2008), «Primary Pupils’ Use of Information and Communication Technologies at School and Home», British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 5, pp. 919-32,
  70. J. Shan Fu (2013), «Ict in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications», International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9, 1, pp. 112-25,
  71. L.H. Shaw, L.M. Gant (2002), «Users Divided? Exploring the Gender Gap in Internet Use», CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 6, pp. 517-27.
  72. K. Steffens (2014), «Ict Use and Achievement in three European countries: What does Pisa tell us?», European Educational Research Journal, 13, 5, pp. 553-562.
  73. A. Sullivan (2001), «Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment», Sociology, 35, 4, pp. 893-912,, DOI: 10.1017/S0038038501008938
  74. R. Sutherland, K. Facer, R. Furlong, J. Furlong (2000), «A New Environment for Education? The Computer in the Home», Computers & Education, 34, 3-4, pp. 195-212,, DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00045-7
  75. R.M. Tamim, R.M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, P.C. Abrami, R.F. Schmid (2011), «What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning a Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study», Review of Educational Research, 81, 1, pp. 4-28,, DOI: 10.3102/0034654310393361
  76. S. Thomée, A. Härenstam, M. Hagberg (2011), «Mobile Phone Use and Stress, Sleep Disturbances, and Symptoms of Depression among Young Adults. A Prospective Cohort Study», Bmc Public Health, 11, 1, p. 66.
  77. P. Wallace (2014), «Internet Addiction Disorder and Youth», Embo Reports, 15, 1, pp. 12-6,
  78. A. Wąsiński, Ł. Tomczyk (2015), «Factors Reducing the Risk of Internet Addiction in Young People in Their Home Environment», Children and Youth Services Review, 57, pp. 68-74.
  79. P. Wastiau, R. Blamire, C. Kearney, V. Quittre, E. Van de Gaer, C. Monseur (2013), «The Use of Ict in Education: A Survey of Schools in Europe», European Journal of Education, 48, 1, pp. 11-27,
  80. B. Williamson (2016), «Digital Education Governance: Data Visualization, Predictive Analytics, and “Real-time” Policy Instruments», Journal of Education Policy, 31, 2, pp. 123-41,, DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758
  81. K.S. Young (1998), «Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder», Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1, 3, pp. 237-44.

Orazio Giancola, Luca Salmieri, in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 121/2020, pp. 114-133, DOI:10.3280/SR2020-121006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content