Clicca qui per scaricare

Local groups’ actions to develop a sense of responsible togetherness
Titolo Rivista: PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’ 
Autori/Curatori: Fortuna Procentese, Anna Gargiulo, Flora Gatti 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  15 P. 65-79 Dimensione file:  522 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSC2020-001005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The study explores the reciprocal acknowledgment between active local groups and citi-zens as a social dynamic aimed at promoting a more responsible style of togetherness into lo-cal communities. Focalized interviews about this topic were administered to eight members of a socially and politically active group; the Thematic Analysis was used. What emerged high-lights the troubles about a reciprocal acknowledgment, which disempowers group’s mission and actions. The need of further spaces to make differences meet and match, to promote partic-ipation and empowerment, and to foster a reciprocal acknowledgment within local communi-ties emerges. .

Lo studio esplora il reciproco riconoscimento tra gruppi locali attivi e cittadini quale dina-mica sociale volta alla promozione di senso di convivenza responsabile nelle comunità locali. Sono state svolte otto interviste focalizzate sul tema con i membri di un gruppo socialmente e politicamente attivo; è stata utilizzata l’Analisi Tematica. Quanto emerso evidenzia la difficoltà di riconoscimento reciproco che depotenzia la mission e le azioni del gruppo. Emerge la neces-sità di ulteriori spazi che permettano di far incontrare e confrontare le differenze, di promuove-re partecipazione ed empowerment e di favorire il reciproco riconoscimento nelle comunità lo-cali.
Keywords: Senso di convivenza responsabile (SoRT), gruppi sociali, comunità locali, im-pegno, partecipazione, cittadinanza.

  1. Mannarini, T., Fedi, A. & Trippetti, S. (2010). Public involvement: How to encourage citizen participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(4), 262-274.
  2. Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
  3. Arcidiacono, C. (2012). L’intervista focalizzata come strumento per superare chiusure e fraintendimenti nelle dinamiche interculturali. In D. Giovannini & L. Vezzali (Eds.), Immigrazione, processi interculturali e cittadinanza attiva (pp. 373-384). Caserta: Melagrana.
  4. Boffi, M., Riva, E., Rainisio, N. & Inghilleri, P. (2016). Social psychology of flow: A situated framework for optimal experience. In Flow experience (pp. 215-231). Springer, Cham., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_1
  5. Boyd, N.M. & Nowell, B. (2017). Testing a theory of sense of community and community responsibility in organizations: An empirical assessment of predictive capacity on employee well‐being and organizational citizenship. Journal of Community Psychology, 45(2), 210-229.
  6. Boyd, N.M., Nowell, B., Yang, Z. & Hano, M. C. (2018). Sense of community, sense of community responsibility, and public service motivation as predictors of employee well-being and engagement in public service organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 428-443., DOI: 10.1177/027507401769287
  7. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf & K.J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  8. Brodsky, A.E. (1996). Resilient single mothers in risky neighborhoods: Negative psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 347-363.
  9. Cardoso, G. & Jacobetty, P. (2012). Surfing the crisis: cultures of belonging and networked social change. In M. Castells, J. Caraça & G. Cardoso (Eds.), Aftermath: the cultures of the economic crisis (pp. 177-209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Christens, B.D., Speer, P.W. & Peterson, N.A. (2016). Assessing Community Participation: Comparing Self-Reported Participation Data with Organizational Attendance Records. American Journal of Community Psychology, 0, 1-11.
  11. Cicognani, E., Pirini, C., Keyes, C., Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R. & Nosratabadi, M. (2008). Social participation, sense of community and social well-being: A study on American, Italian and Iranian university students. Social Indicators Research, 89(1), 97-112.
  12. Cotterell, J. (1996). Social networks and social influences in adolescence. London, England: Routledge.
  13. Delhey, J. & Dragolov, G. (2016). Happier together. Social cohesion and subjective well‐being in Europe. International Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 163-176.
  14. Di Maria, F. (Ed.) (2000). Psicologia della convivenza. Soggettività e socialità. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  15. Di Napoli, I. & Arcidiacono, C. (2013). The use of self-anchoring scales in social research: the Cantril scale for the evaluation of community action orientation. In C. Davino & L. Fabbris (Eds.), Survey Data Collection and Integration (pp. 73-85). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  16. Di Napoli, I., Dolce, P. & Arcidiacono, C. (2019). Community trust: A social indicator related to community engagement. Social Indicators Research, 145(4), 1-29.
  17. Flanagan, C.A., Syvertsen, A.K. & Stout, M.D. (2007). Civic Measurement Models: Tapping Adolescents’ Civic Engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE).
  18. Gargiulo, A. & Margherita G. (2019). Narratives of Self-harm: the experience of young women through the qualitative analysis of blogs. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 1-19., DOI: 10.6092/2282-1619/2019.7.205
  19. Gargiulo, A. & Tenerini, A. (2019). Understanding the group process in the first year of psychotherapy: the walk, the basic assumptions and the challenges of young adults. Group Analysis, 53(1), 3-19., DOI: 10.1177/053331641988155
  20. Hughey, J., Speer, P.W. & Peterson, N.A. (1999). Sense of community in community organizations: Structure and evidence of validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(1), 97-113.
  21. Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. London: Calder and Boyars.
  22. Kagan, C., Burton, M., Duckett, P., Lawthom, R. & Siddiquee, A. (2011). Critical Community Psychology. West Sussex, the UK: Wiley.
  23. Latouche, S. (2010). Pour sortir de la societé de consommation: Voix et voies dela decroissance. Brignon: Les Liens Qui Liberent.
  24. Margherita, G. & Gargiulo, A. (2018). A comparison between pro-anorexia and non-suicidal self-injury blogs: From symptom-based identity to sharing of emotions. Psychodynamic Practice, 24(4), 346-363., DOI: 10.1080/14753634.2018.153532
  25. Marzana, D. & Marta, E. (2011). Azione volontaria: un costrutto individuale e relazionale. Psicologia Sociale, 3, 285-290., DOI: 10.1482/35784.
  26. Natale, A., Di Martino, S., Procentese, F. & Arcidiacono, C. (2016). De-growth and critical community psychology: Contributions towards individual and social well-being. Futures, 78, 47-56.
  27. Nowell, B. & Boyd, N. (2010). Viewing community as responsibility as well as resource: Deconstructing the theoretical roots of psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(7), 828-841.
  28. Nowell, B. & Boyd, N.M. (2014). Sense of community responsibility in community collaboratives: Advancing a theory of community as resource and responsibility. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(3-4), 229-242.
  29. Nowell, B., Izod, A.M., Ngaruiya, K.M. & Boyd, N.M. (2016). Public service motivation and sense of community responsibility: Comparing two motivational constructs in understanding leadership within community collaboratives. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 663-676.
  30. Ohmer, M.L. (2007). Citizen participation in neighborhood organizations and its relationship to volunteers’ self-and collective efficacy and sense of community. Social Work Research, 31(2), 109-120.
  31. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Pettigrew, T.F. & Tropp, L.R. (2013). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. NY: Psychology Press.
  33. Prilleltensky, I., Nelson, G. & Peirson, L. (2001). The role of power and control in children’s lives: An ecological analysis of pathways toward wellness, resilience, and problems. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 143-158.
  34. Procentese, F. & Gatti, F. (2019a). People-Nearby Applications and local communities: questioning about individuals’ loneliness and social motivations towards People-Nearby Applications. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(5), 1282-1294.
  35. Procentese, F. & Gatti, F. (2019b). Senso di Convivenza Responsabile: Quale Ruolo nella Relazione tra Partecipazione e Benessere Sociale? Psicologia Sociale, 14(3), 405-426., DOI: 10.1482/9494
  36. Procentese, F. & Gatti, F. (2020). From gayborhoods to people-nearby applications: Sexual minorities and social relationships. Psicologia Sociale, 15 (1), 129-147., DOI: 10.1482/9629
  37. Procentese, F., De Carlo, F. & Gatti, F. (2019). Civic Engagement within the Local Community and Sense of Responsible Togetherness. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 26(4), 513-525., DOI: 10.4473/TPM26.4.
  38. Procentese, F., Gatti, F. & Falanga, A. (2019). Sense of responsible togetherness, sense of community and participation: Looking at the relationships in a university campus. Human Affairs, 29(2), 247-263.
  39. Procentese, F., Scotto di Luzio, S. & Natale, A. (2011). Convivenza responsabile: quali i significati attribuiti nelle comunità di appartenenza? Psicologia di Comunità, 2(2), 19-29., DOI: 10.3280/PSC2011-00200
  40. Proshansky, H.M., Fabian, A.K. & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83., DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-
  41. Sani, F., Madhok, V., Norbury, M., Dugard, P. & Wakefield, J.R.H. (2014). Greater number of group identifications is associated with healthier behavior: Evidence from a Scottish community sample. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20 (3), 466-481.
  42. Sekulova, F. (2015). Happiness. In G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era (pp. 113-116). New York: Routledge.
  43. Wandersman, A. & Florin, P. (2000). Citizen participation and community organizations. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology, pp. 247-252. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers., DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_1
  44. Wildschut, T. & Insko, C.A. (2007). Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 175-211., DOI: 10.1080/1046328070167654
  45. Young, A.F., Russell, A. & Powers, J.R. (2004). The sense of belonging to a neighborhood: can it be measured and is it related to health and well-being in older women? Social Science and Medicine, 59, 2627-2637.
  46. Zimmerman, M.A. (2000). Empowerment theory. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43-63). Boston, MA: Springer



  1. Immacolata Di Napoli, Sara Alfieri, Presentazione del numero. Empowerment and social inclusion in PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA' 1/2020 pp. 5, DOI: 10.3280/PSC2020-001001

Fortuna Procentese, Anna Gargiulo, Flora Gatti, Azioni dei gruppi locali per sviluppare un senso di convivenza responsabile in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 1/2020, pp. 65-79, DOI:10.3280/PSC2020-001005

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche