L’approccio sociologico allo studio dell’innovazione economica e sociale nei lavori di Francesco Ramella, Filippo Barbera, Tania Parisi e Carolina Bandinelli

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Autori/Curatori Vincenzo Luise
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2020/157 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 18 P. 259-276 Dimensione file 234 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2020-157015
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Alford J., Head B.W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Socety, 36(3): 397-413.
  2. Ardvisson A., Peitersen N. (2013). The Ethical Economy: Rebuilding Value after the Crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.
  3. Arvidsson A. (2019). Changemakers: The Industrious Future of the Digital Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  4. Asheim B.T., Coenen L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research policy, 34(8): 1173-1190.
  5. Bandinelli C. (2019). The production of subjectivity in neoliberal culture industries: the case of coworking spaces International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(1): 3-19. DOI: 10.1177/1367877919878449
  6. Bandinelli C. (2020). Social Entrepreneurship and Neoliberalism: Making Money While Doing Good. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
  7. Barbera F., Parisi T. (2019). Innovatori sociali. La sindrome di Prometeo nell’Italia che cambia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  8. Becattini G. (2000). Il Distretto Industriale. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
  9. Boltanski L., Chiapello E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Édition Gallimard.
  10. Busacca M. (2013). Oltre la Retorica della Social Innovation. Impresa Sociale, -- testo disponibile al sito www.rivistaimpresasociale.it/archivio/item/56-oltre-la-retorica-della-social-innovation.html, ultima consultazione: 28/01/ 2020.
  11. Calderini M. (2018). Innovation Commons, Novà Il Sole 24 Ore, -- testo disponibile al sito https://mariocalderini.nova100.ilsole24ore.com/, ultima consultazione: 28/01/2020.
  12. Cameron D. (2013). Prime Minister: ‘Social Investment Can Be a Great Force for Social Change’, -- testo disponibile al sito www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-speech-at-the-social-impact-investment-conference, ultima consultazione: 01/06/2016.
  13. Collins R. (1985). Three sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Dees G.J. (1998). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship, testo disponibile al sito www.caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf, ultima consultazione: 01/06/2016.
  15. Dees J.G., Anderson B.B. (2006). Framing a Theory of Social Entrepreneurship: Building on Two Schools of Practice and Thought. In: Mosher-Williams R. a cura di, Research on Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding and Contributing to an Emerging Field, 1(3): 39-66.
  16. Edwards-Schachter M., Wallace M.L. (2017). ‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119: 64-79.
  17. Fayolle A., Matlay H. a cura di (2010). Handbook of Research on Social Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  18. Ferrary M., Granovetter M. (2009). The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and society, 38(2): 326-359. DOI: 10.1080/03085140902786827
  19. Fisher M. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?. Ropley: Zero Book.
  20. Florida R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
  21. Forbes (2016). 30 Under 30 Social Entrepreneurs, -- testo disponibile al sito www.forbes.com/30-under-30-2016/social-entrepreneurs/#8d6e41076004, ultima consultazione: 01/06/2016.
  22. Foucault M. (1977). The Political Function of the Intellectual. Radical Philosophy, 17: 12-14.
  23. Foucault M. (2010). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Jørgensen T.B., Bozeman B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & society, 39(3): 354-381. DOI: 10.1177/0095399707300703
  25. Marques P., Morgan K., Richardson R. (2018). Social innovation in question: The theoretical and practical implications of a contested concept. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(3): 496-512. DOI: 10.1177/2399654417717986
  26. Martin R.L., Osberg S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: the case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, -- testo disponibile al sito www.ngobiz.org/picture/File/Social%20EnterpeuneurThe%20Case%20of%20Definition.pdf, ultima consultazione: 28/01/ 2020.
  27. Mazzucato M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State. Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths. New YorK: Anthem Press.
  28. Milgram S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology today, 2(1): 60-67.
  29. Morozov E., Chiusi F. (2016). Silicon Valley: i signori del silicio, Torino: Codice.
  30. Neff G. (2012). Venture labor: Work and the burden of risk in innovative industries. Cambridge & London: MIT press.
  31. Nicholls A. (2013). Editorial: Heroes. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(2): 109-112. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2013.820385
  32. Nicholls A., Murdock A. a cura di (2011). Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Nyssens M. a cura di (2006). Social Enterprise: At the Crossroad of Market, Public Policies and Civic Society. New York: Routledge.
  34. O’Brien R. (1992). Global financial integration: the end of geography. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
  35. Obama B. (2015). Remarks by the President at Global Entrepreneurship Event, -- testo disponibile al sito www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/05/11/remarks-president-global-entrepreneurship-event, ultima consultazione: 28/01/2020.
  36. Ogburn W.F. (1922). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. New York: Viking Press.
  37. Polanyi M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
  38. Ramella F. (2013). Sociologia dell'innovazione economica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  39. Schumpeter J. (2003). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
  40. Simmel G. (1907). Philosophie des Geldes. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
  41. Singh J., Fleming L. (2010). Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality?. Management science, 56(1): 41-56.
  42. Smelser N.J., Swedberg R. a cura di (2010). The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  43. Sombart W. (1916). Der moderne Kapitalismus. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
  44. Stark D. (2011). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. New York & London: Princeton University Press.
  45. Steyaert C., Hjort D. a cura di (2006). Entrepreneurship as Social Change, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  46. Tarde G. (1890). Les lois de l'imitation. Paris: Félix Alcan.
  47. Weber M. (1992). Die Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Tübingen: Mohr.
  48. Weber M. (2009). From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology, Oxon and New York: Routledge.

Vincenzo Luise, L’approccio sociologico allo studio dell’innovazione economica e sociale nei lavori di Francesco Ramella, Filippo Barbera, Tania Parisi e Carolina Bandinelli in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 157/2020, pp 259-276, DOI: 10.3280/SL2020-157015