Click here to download

Covid-19 and institutional and media communication
Journal Title: PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro 
Author/s: Davide Lucantoni 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  16 Pg. 43-58 FullText PDF:  253 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PRI2020-001004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The article describes the results of a survey carried out in the mid-Adriatic area during the first wave of the pandemic, about the living conditions of the population during the quarantine, also collecting information on the future expectations of the sample, in light of the social transformations brought by the pandemic. Furthermore, is provided an interpretative framework with regard to the impact that the interpenetration between political and scientific communication, within the dynamics and narrative mechanisms of the different media, has had on social behavior and identity formations in a pandemic context that puts at risk the ontological security of collectivity. Lastly, the datas related to the perceptions of the sample about political and scientific communication are analyzed in the light of the infodemic phenomenon, in particular with respect to the transformations of communicative action imposed by the forced digital transition of the country. Results showed that trust in credibility and scientific sources is mainly judged as sufficient, although a non-residual part of the sample tends to doubt it or believe that it is pure manipulation. The article claims that scientific communication has not been able to get out of the impasse in which the scientist legitimizes his statements by exercising the authority that is dogmatically attributed to him by common sense, accepting the credibility that is offered to him by the symbolic capital of belief systems.
Keywords: infodemic, covid-19, political communication, scientific communica-tion, new communication technologies.

  1. Herbst S. (1993) Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics, Chicago University Press: Chicago.
  2. Horbach S.P.J.M. (2020) “Pandemic Publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19”, Quantitative Science Studies.
  3. King A. (2020) “Fast news or fake news?: The advantages and the pitfalls of rapid publication through pre-print servers during a pandemic”, EMBO Rep, 21:e50817.
  4. Landowski E. (2003) La società riflessa. Saggi di sociosemiotica, Meltemi: Sesto San Giovanni.
  5. Lippmann W. (1923) L’opinione pubblica, Donzelli: Roma.
  6. McQuail D. (2007) Sociologia dei media, il mulino: Bologna.
  7. Nicolosi G. (2020) “Comunicazione istituzionale e gestione delle crisi”, Bollettino d’Ateneo, Università degli Studi di Catania. -- Consultabile online: http://www.bollettino.unict.it/articoli/comunicazione-e-gestione-delle-crisi.
  8. Nocenzi M. (2003) Vivere l'incertezza, FrancoAngeli: Milano, p. 204.
  9. OMS – Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità, alla voce: Infodemic, -- consultabile online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1.
  10. Orazi F., Lucantoni D. (2020) “Le trame del complotto. Narrazioni politiche tra scienza e pseudoscienza nell'era dei social media”, Rivista Storia e problemi contemporanei, Ancona.
  11. Orazi F., Sofritti F., Lucantoni D. (2020) “La pandemia nell’area Medio-Adriatica: risultati e scenari di una web survey”, Rivista Culture della sostenibilità, 26.
  12. Rose F. (2011) Immersi nelle storie. Il mestiere di raccontare nell’era di internet, Edizioni Codice: Torino.
  13. Sartori G. (1979) La politica, Sugarco edizioni: Varese, p. 306.
  14. Scaglioni M. (2020) Il virus sullo schermo. Il sismografo televisivo e la mediazione della crisi. In Scaglioni M. e Sala M., a cura di, L’altro virus. Comunicazione e disinformazione al tempo del Covid-19, Vita e Pensiero, pp. 17-29.
  15. Sofritti F., Orazi F. (2020) “Technological welfare as an answer to the pandemic emergency: education and healthcare in the Italian case”, Cambio. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali, Open Lab on Covid-19.
  16. Solito L. (2014) “Tra cambiamenti visibili e immobilismi opachi: la comunicazione pubblica in Italia”, Sociologia della comunicazione, 2, pp. 100-118.
  17. Solito L. (2018) “Comunicazione istituzionale e società̀ digitale. Un nuovo ruolo per i comunicatori pubblici”, Comunicazione politica, 3, pp. 393-412.
  18. Talley N. J. (2020). “SARS-CoV-2, the medical profession, ventilator beds, and mortality predictions: personal reflections of an Australian clinician”, Medical Journal of Australia.
  19. Thompson J.B. (1998) Mezzi di comunicazione e modernità. Una teoria sociale dei media, il Mulino: Bologna.
  20. Adorno T.W., Horkheimer M. (1969) Dialettica dell’illuminismo, Einaudi: Segrate.
  21. AGCOM (2020) Le comunicazioni nel 2020, -- disponibile online: https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/4707592/Allegato+6-7-2020+1594044962316/36cae229-dcac-4468-9623-46aabd47964f?version=1.1.
  22. Bonini C., D’Avanzo G. (2006) Il mercato della paura, Einaudi: Segrate.
  23. Bucchi M., Saracino B. (2020) Gli italiani e il Coronavirus: uno su cinque sottovaluta il problema, Observa Science in Society. -- Consultabile online: https://www.observa.it/gli-italiani-e-il-coronavirus/.
  24. Capra F. (1975) Il tao della fisica, Adelphi: Milano.
  25. Centorrino M. (2020) “Infodemia e comdemia: la comunicazione istituzionale e la sfida del Covid 19”, Humanities, IX(18).
  26. Giddens A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity: Cambridge.
  27. Habermas J. (1962) Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica, Laterza: Roma-Bari.

Davide Lucantoni, Covid-19 and institutional and media communication in "PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro" 1/2020, pp. 43-58, DOI:10.3280/PRI2020-001004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content