Clicca qui per scaricare

Personal network e comunità ibride: le social street
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Autori/Curatori:  Ivana Matteucci 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: 125  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  19 P. 97-115 Dimensione file:  322 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2021-125006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 




This article aims to verify how the personal network in online space generated by individu-als belonging to social groups and virtual communities, represents a contribution and a support for the relational life in the real social space. We carried out an exploratory study where, through the analysis of a case, the basis for understanding the phenomenon of the Social Streets were acquired: our hypothesis could be tested on a larger number of cases by future researches. Some members of a Facebook group of a Social Street were involved through online questionnaires. We found that the individuals’ online community life can be significant-ly linked to the group’s offline life in the shared urban social space of the street, shaping our example as a hybrid community and a concrete case of augmented reality.
Keywords: Community, personal network, Social Street, urban space, street, social relationship

  1. Augè M. (2018). Il bisogno di luoghi. In Pasqualini C. Vicini e connessi. Rapporto sulle So-cial Street a Milano. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  2. Augé M., Pasqualini, C. (2016). Habiter les villes-monde. (Non/Virtuels/Nouveaux) Lieux et relations sociales. Studi di Sociologia, 4: 303-313.
  3. Bauman Z. (2014). La vita tra reale e virtuale. Milano: EGEA.
  4. Bauman Z. (2000). Missing Community. Cambridge: Polity Press. (trad. it.: Voglia di Comu-nità. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2001).
  5. Bauman Z. (2010). Lo spettro dei barbari. Adesso e allora. Milano-Roma: Bevivino.
  6. Blokland T. (2017). Community as urban practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  7. Blokland T., Savage M. (2008). Networked urbanism. Social capital in the city. Ashgate: Aldeshot and Burlington.
  8. Blokland T., van Eijk G. (2010). Do people who like diversity practice diversity in neigh-bourhood life? Neighbourhood use and the social network of ‘diversity seekers’ in a mixed neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Study, 36(2): 313-32., DOI: 10.1080/13691830903387436
  9. Bourdieu P. (1980). Le capital social. -Notes provisoire. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales. 31: 2-3.
  10. Bourdieu P., Wacquant L.J.D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: Univer-sity of Chicago Press.
  11. Broadbent S. (2012). Internet, lavoro, vita privata. Come le nuove tecnologie cambiano il nostro mondo. Bologna: il Mulino.
  12. Caplan G., Killilea M. (1976). Support systems and mutual help. New York: Grune & Stratton.
  13. Castells M., (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture, vol. I: The rise of the network society; (trad. it. La nascita della società in rete. Milano: Università Bocco-ni, 2002).
  14. Castells M. (2000). Toward a sociology of the network Society. Contemporary Sociology. 29(5): 693-699., DOI: 10.2307/2655234
  15. Castrignanò M. (2012). Comunità, capitale sociale, quartiere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  16. Castriganò M., Morelli N. (2019). Le social street come forma di ordinaria azione civica: prospettive di ricerca. Studi di sociologia, (4): 397-412., DOI: 10.26350/000309_000078
  17. Coleman J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  18. Concilio G., De Bonis L., Molinari F. (2018). Innovazione place-based: il caso delle social street. Territorio, 87(4): 154-161., DOI: 10.3280/TR2018-08702
  19. Corbetta P. (1999). Metodologia e tecnica della ricerca sociale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  20. Crespi F. (2004). Identità e riconoscimento, nella sociologia contemporanea. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  21. Dubé L., Robey D. (2008). Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Information Sys-tems Journal, 19: 3-30.
  22. Durkheim E. (1893). De la division du travail social. Paris: Alcan; (trad. it. La divisione del lavoro sociale. Milano: Comunità, 1962).
  23. Donati PP. Colozzi I. (2006). Il paradigma relazionale nelle scienze sociali. Le prospettive sociologiche. Bologna: il Mulino.
  24. Ellison N.B., Steinfield C.W., Lampe C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook Friends: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4): 1143-1168.
  25. Garfinkel A. (1963). A conception of and experiments with ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O.J. Harvey. Motivation and social interaction. New York: Ronald Press: 187-238; (trad. it. La fiducia. Roma: Armando, 2004).
  26. Giddens A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, Polity Press (trad. it. La costitu-zione della società. Milano: Comunità, 1990).
  27. Giddens A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press. (trad. it. Le conseguenze della modernità. Bologna: il Mulino, 1994).
  28. Gottlieb B.H. (a cura di) (1991). Social networks and social support. Beverly Hills: Sage
  29. Grossetti (2007). Are French networks different? Social Networks. 29(3): 391-404.
  30. Gurevitch Z. (1988). The other side of dialogue: on making the other strange and the experience of otherness. American Journal of Sociology, 93(5): 1179-1199., DOI: 10.1086/228868
  31. Granovetter M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.
  32. Hall A., Wellman B. (1985). Social networks and social support. In S. Cohen & S.L. Syme (eds). Social support and health. Cambridge MA: Academic Press, 1985: 23-41.
  33. Hampton K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. PEW Internet and American Life Project. -- https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2011/06/16/social-networking-sites-and-our-lives/ (accesso 12/05/ 2020).
  34. Jurgenson N. (2011a). Digital dualism versus augmented reality. The Society Pages, 24.
  35. http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/02/24/digital-dualism-versus-augmented-reality/ (accesso 16/05/2020).
  36. Jurgenson N. (2011b). Augmented Friendship Illustrated by PEW Data. -- https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/06/16/augmented-friendship-illustrated-by-pew-data/ (accesso 12/05/2020).
  37. Jurgenson N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet, 4(1): 83-91.
  38. Lane J. (2019). The digital street. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Lilly S., Lightfoot G., Amaral P. (2004), Representing organization: Knowledge, manage-ment, and the information age, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  40. Lin N., Cook K., Burt R.S. (2017). Social capital theory and research. London & New York: Routledge.
  41. Metitieri F. (2003). La comunità virtuale. Milano. FrancoAngeli.
  42. McMillan D.W., Chavis D.M. (1986). Sense of community: A Definition and theory. Jour-nal of Community Psychology. 14(1): 6-23., DOI: 10.1002/1520-6629
  43. Mitchell J.C. (Ed). (1969). Social networks in urban situations. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
  44. Morelli N. (2019). Creating urban sociality in Middle-Class Neighborhoods in Milan and Bologna: A study on the social street phenomenon. City & Community, 18(3): 834-852.
  45. Parsons T. (1937). The Structure of social action, New York: McGraw-Hill; (trad. it. La struttura dell’azione sociale). Bologna: il Mulino, 1987.
  46. Pasqualini C. (2018). Vicini e connessi. Rapporto sulle Social Street a Milano. Milano: Feltrinelli. Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse end revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. (trad. it. Capitale sociale e individualismo. Bologna: il Mulino, 2004).
  47. Putnam R.D., Feldestein L.M. (2003). Better togheter. Restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  48. Raine L., Wellman B. (2012). Networked. The new social opertaing system. Cambridge Ma: the MIT Press; (trad. it. Networked. Il nuovo sistema operativo sociale. Milano: Guerini, 2012).
  49. Renninger K.A., Shumar W. (Eds). (2004). Building virtual communities. learning and change in cyberspace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Rosa H. (2005). Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne, Frankfurt AM: Suhrkamp Verlag. (trad. it. Accelerazione e alienazione. Per una teoria critica del tempo nella tarda modernitá. Torino: Einaudi, 2015).
  51. Sampson R.J. (2011). Neighborhood effects, causal mechanisms, and the social structure of the city. In P. Demeulenaere (Ed). (2011). Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press: 227-250.
  52. Sampson R.J. (2012). Great American City: The enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  53. Sampson R.J., Schachner J., Mare R.D. (2017). Urban income inequality and the Great Re-cession in Sunbelt form: disentangling individual and neighborhood-level change in Los Angeles. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3: 102-128., DOI: 10.7758/RFS.2017.3.2.05
  54. Sarason S.B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. Jossey-Bass: London.
  55. Steinfield C., Ellison N., Lampe C. (2008). Social Capital, Selfesteem, and Use of Online Social Network Sites: A longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psy-chology. 29(6): 434-445.
  56. Stutzman S. (2006). An Evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communi-ties. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 3(1): 10-18.
  57. Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Lipsia, Fues; (trad. it. Comunità e Socie-tà. Milano: Comunità, 1963).
  58. Tronca L. (a cura di). (2012). Personal network analysis. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  59. Turkle S. (2012). Alone together. New York, Basic Books; (trad. it. Insieme ma soli, Torino, Codice, 2019).
  60. Turkle S. (2016). Reclaiming conversation. New York, Penguin Books. (trad. it. La conver-sazione necessaria. Torino: Einaudi, 2016).
  61. Walker K.M., MacBride A., Vachon M.L.S. (1977). Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement. Social Sciences and Medicine. 11(1): 35-41., DOI: 10.1016/0037-7856(77)90143-3
  62. Wellman B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5): 1201-1231.
  63. Wellman B. (1981). Applying network analysis to the study of support. In B.H Gottlieb (a cura di). Social networks and social support. London, Beverly Hills: Sage: 171-201.
  64. Wellman B. Giulia M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don’t ride alone. In M.A. Smith, & P. Kollock (Eds). Communities in Cyberspace London: Routledge: 167-194.
  65. Wellman B. (2001). The rise of networked individualism. In L. Keeble (Eds). Community Networks Online. London: Taylor & Francis. Wellman B., Quan-Haase A., Boase J., Chen W., Hampton K., Díaz I., Miyata K. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Comput-er-Mediated Communication, 8(3), JCMC834.
  66. Wellman B., Wortley S. (1990). Differente strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 558-588., DOI: 10.1086/229572

Ivana Matteucci, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 125/2021, pp. 97-115, DOI:10.3280/SUR2021-125006

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche