Click here to download

In the Scheme. Italian Academic Women between Teaching Duties and Research
Author/s: Alessandra Minello, Concetta Russo 
Year:  2021 Issue: 160 Language: Italian 
Pages:  22 Pg. 88-109 FullText PDF:  262 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2021-160005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The academic labor is divided between researching, teaching and fulfilling admin-istrative tasks. After the Gelmini reform, research has gain a relevant weight for career advancement. According to the literature, women are more inclined to take on teaching and administrative tasks, due to a gender scheme which considers them as more suited to these tasks. They are less likely to reach top positions and achieve them at a slower pace. In this paper we explore the role of teaching tasks in the trajectories of a group of Italian female academics, investigating the paths of adaptation/resistance to the new rules of competition. Through fifteen qualita-tive interviews it emerges teaching is an anchoring element: our interviewees per-ceive the direct relationship with students as indispensable to the achievement of professional satisfaction, or they consider the investment in this area as a potential gateway to an academic career. Some have experienced pressing demands for ful-filling both teaching and administrative tasks.
Keywords: Gender, Academia, Research, Teaching

  1. Armano E., Murgia A. (2013). The precariousness of young knowledge workers: a subject-oriented approach. Global Discourse, 3(3-4): 486-501., DOI: 10.1080/23269995.2013.86531
  2. Babcock L., Recalde M.P. and Vesterlund L. (2017). Gender differences in the allocation of low-promotability tasks: The role of backlash. American Economic Review, 107(5): 131-35.
  3. Bellas M.L. (1999). Emotional Labor in academia: The case of professors. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1): 96-110., DOI: 10.1177/00027162995610010
  4. Benschop Y., Brouns M. (2003). Crumbling ivory towers: academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work and Organization, 10(2): 194-212.
  5. Berlant L.G. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  6. Boffo S., Moscati R. (2008), Evaluation in the Italian Higher Education System: many tribes, many territories... many godfathers. European Journal of Education 33(8): 349-360.
  7. Bozzon R., Murgia A. and Villa P. (2017). Precariousness and gender asymmetries among early career researchers: a focus on stem fields in the Italian academia. Polis, 31(1): 127-158., DOI: 10.1424/8608
  8. Bozzon R., Murgia A. and Poggio B. (2019). Gender and precarious careers in academia and research: Macro, meso and micro perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
  9. Clark S. (1986). The academic profession and career: Perspectives and problems. Teaching Sociology, 14: 24-34. -- Stable URL:
  10. Colarusso S., Giancola O. (2020). Università e nuove forme di valutazione. Strategie individuali, produzione scientifica, effetti istituzionali. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice.
  11. Davis D.E., Astin H.S. (1990). Life cycle, career cycle, and gender stratification in academe: Expelling myths and exposing truths. In: Lie S., O’Leary V., editors, Storming the tower: Women in the academic world. Londra: Kogan Page.
  12. Facchini C., Sacconi L. e Fia M. (2019). La governance delle università italiane dopo la Riforma Gelmini: un'indagine empirica sui processi decisionali. EconomEtica Working Papers, 68.
  13. Ferlie E., Musselin C. e Andresani G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education, 56: 325-348.
  14. Fox M.F. (1990). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65(4): 293-305., DOI: 10.2307/211277
  15. Gaiaschi C., Musumeci R. (2020). Just a Matter of Time? Women’s Career Advancement in Neo-Liberal Academia. An Analysis of Recruitment Trends in Italian Universities. Social sciences, 9(9): 163.
  16. Goastellec G., Pekari N. (2013). Gender Differences and Inequalities in Academia: Findings in Europe. In: Teichler U., Höhle E., editors, The work situation of the academic profession in Europe: Findings of a survey in twelve countries. Dordrecht: Springer.
  17. Goode J., Bagilhole B. (1998). Gendering the management of change in higher education: a case study. Gender, Work & Organization, 5(3): 148-164., DOI: 10.1111/1468-0432.0005
  18. Hochschild A. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3): 551-575., DOI: 10.1086/22704
  19. Hochschild A. (2003). The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  20. Kantola J. (2008). ‘Why do all women disappear?’ Gendering processes in a political science department. Gender, Work and Organization, 15(2): 202-225.
  21. Ladd E.C. (1979). The work experiences of American college professors. Current Issues in Higher Education, 22: 135-154.
  22. Light D. (1974). The structure of academic professions. Sociology of Education, 47: 2-28.
  23. Marini G., Meschitti V. (2018). The trench warfare of gender discrimination: evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. Scientometrics, 115: 989-1006.
  24. Miller C., Roksa J. (2020). Balancing research and service in academia: Gender, race, and laboratory tasks. Gender & Society 34(1): 131-152., DOI: 10.1177/089124321986791
  25. Minello A., Martucci S. and Manzo L.K.C. (2021). The pandemic and the academic mothers: present hardships and future perspectives. European Societies, 23: 582-593., DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.180969
  26. Miur (2018). Il personale docente e non docente nel sistema universitario italiano – a.a 2016/2017. -- Testo disponibile dal sito:
  27. Moscati R. (2008). La cultura accademica e le nuove funzioni dell’università. In: Moscati R., Vaira M., a cura di, L’università di fronte al cambiamento. Realizzazioni, problemi, prospettive. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Moscati R. (2001). Italian University Professors in Transition. Higher Education, 41(1/2): 103-129., DOI: 10.1023/A:102676682975
  29. Myers K.R., Tham W.Y., Yin Y., Cohodes N., Thursby J.G., Thursby M.C., Schiffer P., Walsh J.T., Lakhani K.R. and Wang D. (2020). Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature Human Behaviour, 4: 880-883.
  30. Normand R. (2016). The changing epistemic governance of European education. The fabrication of the homo academicus Europeanus?. Dordrecht: Springer.
  31. Palomba R., Menniti, A. (2001). Minerva’s Daughters. Roma: Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali.
  32. Parker L.D. (2002). It’s been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5-6): 603-619.
  33. Parsons T., Platt G. (1968). Considerations of the American academic system. Minerva, 6: 497-523., DOI: 10.1007/BF0109654
  34. Picardi I. (2019). La porta di cristallo: un nuovo indice per rilevare l’impatto di genere della riforma Gelmini sull’accesso alla professione accademica. Quaderni di Sociologia, 80: 87-111.
  35. Picardi I. (2020). Labirinti di cristallo. Strutture di genere nella ricerca e nell’accademia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  36. Poggio B. (2006). Editorial: outline of a theory of gender practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 13(3): 225-233.
  37. Puljak L, Sharif W.D. (2009). Postdocs’ perceptions of work environment and career prospects at a US academic institution. Research Evaluation, 18(5): 411-415., DOI: 10.3152/095820209X48306
  38. Raffaetà R. (2020). Perdite e stato di liminalità: un’autoetnografia tra precarietà riproduttiva e precarietà lavorativa. In: Mattalucci C., Raffaetà R., a cura di, Generare tra la vita e la morte: Aborto e morte perinatale in una prospettiva multidisciplinare. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  39. Rebora G., Turri M. (2011). Critical factors in the use of evaluation in italian universities. Higher Education, 61(5): 531-544.
  40. Santos G.G., Cabral-Cardoso C. (2008). Work–family culture in academia: a gendered view of work–family conflict and coping strategies. Gender in Management, 23(6): 442-457., DOI: 10.1108/1754241081089755
  41. Schiebinger L., Henderson A.D. and Gilmartin S.K. (2008). Dual-career academic couples: What universities need to know. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  42. Taylor S.E. (1981). A Categorization Approach to Stereotyping. In: Hamilton D.L., editor, Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
  43. Vaira M. (2003). Higher education reform in Italy: An institutional analysis and a first appraisal. 1996-2001. Higher Education Policy, 16: 179-203.
  44. Valian V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3): 198-213.
  45. Williams J.C. (2005). The glass ceiling and the maternal wall in academia. New Directions for Higher Education, 130: 91-105.
  46. Wilson F. (1996). Research note: Organizational theory: Blind and deaf to gender? Organization Studies. 17(5): 825-842., DOI: 10.1177/01708406960170050
  47. Winslow S. (2010). Gender inequality and time allocations among academic faculty. Gender & Society, 24(6): 769-793., DOI: 10.1177/089124321038672
  48. Woodward I. (2007). Understanding Material Culture. New York: Sage.

Alessandra Minello, Concetta Russo, In the Scheme. Italian Academic Women between Teaching Duties and Research in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 160/2021, pp. 88-109, DOI:10.3280/SL2021-160005


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content