Clicca qui per scaricare

Conoscersi, ma da lontano: Una review sul fenomeno del dating online nella popolazione eterosessuale
Autori/Curatori: Rosario Valentino Simone Giordano 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: 2  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  19 P. 47-65 Dimensione file:  214 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RSC2021-002003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

Il presente lavoro mira a trattare alcuni aspetti relativi all’utilizzo delle piatta-forme di dating online da parte della popolazione eterosessuale. Dopo avere spie-gato, nell’introduzione, il loro funzionamento generale, si procede all’analisi dei più importanti tratti di personalità legati all’utilizzo di questi servizi. Vengono successi-vamente trattate alcune strategie per la creazione del proprio profilo. Si affrontano poi alcuni dei più comuni rischi legati all’utilizzo dei sistemi di dating, come il cat-fishing o la pratica di avere rapporti sessuali non protetti con partner incontrati on-line. In conclusione, sono riportati i limiti del lavoro ed eventuali prospettive future di ricerca su alcuni aspetti del fenomeno ancora poco conosciuti.

Keywords: dating online, tratti di personalità, catfishing, sesso non protetto, MST, eterosessuali

  1. Birnholtz J., Fitzpatrick C., Hande M., Brubaker J.R. (2014). Identity, identification and identifiability: The language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services, 3-12.
  2. Botnen E.O. (2017). Associations between picture-based mobile dating app use, sociosexuality, self-perceived mate value and self-esteem (Tesi di Master, NTNU). -- Testo disponibile al sito: =1&isAllowed=y (data di consultazione: 10/04/2020)
  3. Botnen E.O., Bendixen M., Grøntvedt T.V., Kennair L.E.O. (2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131: 67-73.
  4. Cabecinha M., Merce C.H., Gravningen K., Aicken C., Jones K.G., Tanton C., Kaye W., Sonnenberg P., Field N. (2017). Finding sexual partners online: Prevalence and associations with sexual behaviour, STI diagnoses and other sexual health outcomes in the British population. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 93(8): 572-582.
  5. Chan L.S. (2017). Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-seeking, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the integrative model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72: 246-258.
  6. Choi E.P., Wong J.Y., Lo H.H., Wong W., Chio J.H., Fong D.Y. (2016). The association between smartphone dating applications and college students’ casual sex encounters and condom use. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 9: 38-41.
  7. Clement J. (2019). Most popular online dating apps in the United States as of September 2019, by audience size. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (data di consultazione: 18/05/2020)
  8. Dinh R., Gildersleve P., Yasseri T. (2018). Computational courtship: Understanding the evolution of online dating through large-scale data analysis. arXiv preprint. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (data di consultazione: 16/05/2020)
  9. Dunlop J. (2018). App-ily ever after-self-presentation and perception of others on the dating app Tinder. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 6185. -- Testo disponibile al sito: =7185&context=etd (data di consultazione: 12/05/2020).
  10. Gatter K., Hodkinson K. (2016). On the differences between Tinder TM versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent Psychology, 3(1)., DOI: 10.1080/23311908.2016.116241
  11. Griffin M. (2018). Predictors of mobile dating application use among college students (Tesi di dottorato, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte). -- Testo disponibile al sito: 3A720/datastream/PDF/download/citation.pdf (data di consultazione: 12/05/2020)
  12. Guadagno R.E., Okdie B.M., Kruse S.A. (2012). Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2): 642-647.
  13. Hancock J.T., Toma C., Ellison N. (2007). The truth about lying in online dating profiles. CHI ‘07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 449-452., DOI: 10.1145/1240624.124069
  14. Huang E.T.Y., Williams H., Hocking J.S., Lim M.S. (2016). Safe sex messages within dating and entertainment smartphone apps: A review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(4): e124.
  15. Jonason P.K., Valentine K.A., Li N.P., Harbeson C.L. (2011). Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6): 759-763.
  16. Jonason P., Bulyk R. (2019). Who uses Tinder?: The Dark Triad traits, attachment, and mate value. Studia Psychologica: Theoria et Praxis, 19(1): 5-15.
  17. Kim M., Kwon K.N., Lee M. (2009). Psychological characteristics of Internet dating service users: The effect of self-esteem, involvement, and sociability on the use of Internet dating services. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4): 445-449.
  18. LeFebvre L.E. (2018). Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(9): 1205-1229.
  19. Levy J., Markell D., Cerf M. (2019). Polar similars: Using massive mobile dating data to predict dating preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 2010.
  20. Lo S.K., Hsieh A.Y., Chiu Y.P. (2013). Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4): 1755-1762.
  21. March E., Grieve R., Marrington J., Jonason P.K. (2017). Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 110: 139-143.
  22. Masson M., Lamoureux J., de Guise E. (2020). Self-reported risk-taking and sensation-seeking behavior predict helmet wear amongst Canadian ski and snowboard instructors. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 52(2): 121-130.
  23. Mosley M.A., Lancaster M., Parker M.L., Campbell K. (2020). Adult attachment and online dating deception: A theory modernized. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 35(2): 227-243., DOI: 10.1080/14681994.2020.171457
  24. Ong D., Wang J. (2015). Income attraction: An online dating field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 111: 13-22.
  25. Orosz G., Benyo M., Berkes B., Nikoletti E., Gál È., Tóth-Király I., Bőthe B. (2018). The personality, motivational, and need-based background of problematic Tinder use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(2): 301-316., DOI: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.2
  26. Paulhus D.L., Williams K.M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6): 556-563., DOI: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-
  27. Pernokis D. (2018). Dating life experiences: An exploratory study of the interrelationships between personality, online dating and subjective well-being. Undergraduate honor theses, 73. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (data di consultazione: 15/05/2020)
  28. Rosenfeld M.J., Thomas R.J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4): 523-547.
  29. Sevi B. (2019). The dark side of Tinder: The Dark Triad of personality as correlates of Tinder use. Journal of Individual Differences, 40(4): 242-246.
  30. Siegel K., Lekas H.M., Onaga M., Verni R., Gunn H. (2017). The strategies of heterosexuals from large metropolitan areas for assessing the risks of exposure to HIV or other sexually transmitted infections from partners met online. AIDS patient care and STDs, 31(4): 182-195.
  31. Siegel K., Meunier È., Lekas H.M. (2017). Accounts for unprotected sex with partners met online from heterosexual men and women from large US Metropolitan Areas. AIDS patient care and STDs, 31(7): 315-328.
  32. Timmermans E., De Caluwé E. (2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110: 74-79.
  33. Toma C.L., Hancock J.T. (2010). Reading between the lines: Linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ‘10. the 2010 ACM conference, 5-8., DOI: 10.1145/1718918.171892
  34. Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(6): 849-852.
  35. Ward J. (2017). What are you doing on Tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11): 1644-1659., DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.125241
  36. Zytko D., Grandhi S.A., Jones Q. (2014). Impression management struggles in online dating. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP ‘14. Presentato al the 18th International Conference, 53-62., DOI: 10.1145/2660398.266041

Rosario Valentino Simone Giordano, in "RIVISTA DI SESSUOLOGIA CLINICA" 2/2021, pp. 47-65, DOI:10.3280/RSC2021-002003


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche