La Student Measure of Culturally Responsive Teaching scale: adattamento e validazione per il contesto universitario italiano

Titolo Rivista EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Autori/Curatori Nicolina Bosco, Loretta Fabbri, Mario Giampaolo
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/1 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 16 P. 39-54 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa1-2022oa13935
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L’articolo presenta le prime evidenze sull’adattamento e la validazione italiana dello Student Measure of Culturally Responsive Teaching volto a misurare le percezioni delle studentesse e degli studenti universitari sulle pratiche didattiche attente alla dimensione culturale in aula. Tale strumento è stato somministrato ad un campione di 336 studentesse e studenti iscritti all’Università di Siena. I dati raccolti hanno permesso di condurre l’analisi fattoriale esplorativa dello strumento, confermando la struttura trifattoriale. La consistenza interna dello Student Measure of Culturally Responsive Teaching e dei fattori emergenti è stata misurata attraverso l’alpha di Cronbach i cui risultati suggeriscono che la versione italiana di tale strumento presenta una buona consistenza interna ed un buon livello di affidabilità anche rispetto alle sue componenti.;

Keywords:; culturally responsive teaching; misure; validazione; università multiculturali; popolazione studentesca

  1. Au, K. (2009). Isn’t culturally responsive instruction just good teaching?. Social Education, 73.4, 179-183.
  2. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ 2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 296-298.
  3. Bosco, N., Giampaolo, M., & Orefice, C. (2020). Noi e loro. Un’indagine esplorativa sulle rappresentazioni degli insegnanti in contesti scolastici multiculturali. Educational Reflective Practices, 1, 132-145, DOI: 10.3280/ERP2020-001007.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can “thematic analysis” offer health and well-being researchers? International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 9, DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152.
  5. Castaneda, C. R. (2004). Teaching and learning in diverse classrooms. Routledge-Falmer.
  6. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research, 1.2, 245-276.
  7. Chang, M. J., Denson, N., Sáenz, V., & Misa, K. (2006). The educational benefits of sustaining cross-racial interaction among undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 77.3, 430-455, DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2006.0018.
  8. Coryell, J. E., Cinque, M., Fedeli, M., Lapina Salazar, A., & Tino, C. (2021). University Teaching in Global Times: Perspectives of Italian University Faculty on Teaching International Graduate Students. Journal of Studies in International Education, DOI: 10.1177/1028315321990749
  9. Dickson, G. L., Chun, H., & Fernandez, I. T. (2016). The development and initial validation of the student measure of culturally responsive teaching. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 41.3, 141-154.
  10. Fabbri, L. (2007). Comunità di pratiche e apprendimento riflessivo. Per una formazione situata. Carocci.
  11. Fabbri, L. & Melacarne, C. (2020). Learning and de-learning in everyday life. A case study of an Italian multiethnic district. Educational Reflective Practices, 1, 18-54, DOI: 10.3280/ERP2020-001002.
  12. Fabbri, L., & Romano, A. (2017). Metodi per l’apprendimento trasformativo. Carocci.
  13. Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum inquiry, 43.1, 48-70, DOI: 10.1111/curi.12002.
  14. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers college press.
  15. Ginsberg, M. & Wlodkowski, R. (2009). Diversity and Motivation: Culturally Responsive Teaching in College. Jossey-Bass.
  16. Guy, T. C. (1999). Culture as Context for Adult Education: The Need for Culturally Relevant Adult Education. New directions for adult and continuing education, 82, 5-18.
  17. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Teachers College Press, U.S.A.
  18. Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.) (2009). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Taylor and Francis e-library.
  19. Hu, S., & Kuh, G. (2003). Diversity experiences and college student learning and personal development. Journal of College Student Development, 44.3, 320-334.
  20. Huang, Y. (2019). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of culturally responsive teaching and their sense of belonging and academic self-efficacy in higher education (retrieved on February 2021 from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Undergraduate-Students%E2%80%99-Perceptions-of-Culturally-Huang/f0896baec68cd4699c0964b7c32e67745efa85ce).
  21. James, C. E., & Wood, M. (2005). Multicultural education in Canada: Opportunities, limitations and contradictions. In C.E. James (Ed.). Possibilities and limitations: Multicultural policies and programs in Canada (pp. 93-107). Fernwood.
  22. Jones, E. B. (2004). Culturally relevant strategies for the classroom. In A.M. Johns & M. K. Sipp (Eds.). Diversity in college classrooms: Practices for today’s campuses (pp. 51-72). University of Michigan Press.
  23. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415.
  24. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
  25. Kramlich, D. & Romano, A. (2020). Leveraging (the potential of) the multiethnic classroom: Using the constructs of cultural humility and safety to provide belonging for Cross Cultural Kid (CCK) refugees. Educational Reflective Practices, 1, 146-178, DOI: 10.3280/ERP2020-001008.
  26. Guo, S., & Jamal, Z. (2007). Nurturing cultural diversity in higher education: a critical review of selected models. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37.3, 27-49.
  27. Orefice, C., Betti, M. & Bosco, N. (2019). Processi di inclusione e di esclusione nelle scuole multiculturali. Un’indagine preliminare nel territorio toscano. Comparative Cultural Studies - European and Latin American Perspectives, 4.8, 83‐92.
  28. Rhodes, C. M. (2017). A validation study of the Culturally Responsive Teaching Survey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5.1, 45-53, DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050106.
  29. Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and teacher education, 23.7, 1086-1101.
  30. Sperber, A. D., Devellis, R. F., & Boehlecke, B. (1994). Cross-cultural translation: methodology and validation. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 25.4, 501-524.
  31. Tyupa, S. (2011). A theoretical framework for back-translation as a quality assessment tool. New Voices in Translation Studies, 7.1, 35-46.
  32. Walker, R., & McPhee, R. (2022). Transforming First Nations Individual and Community Realities: Reflections on a Decolonizing Higher Education Project. In A. Nicolaides, S. Eschenbacher, P. T. Buergelt, Y. Gilpin-Jackson, M. Welch, & M. Misawa (a cura di), The Palgrave handbook of learning for transformation (pp. 254-277). Palgrave Macmillan
  33. Yanaprasart, P., & Lüdi, G. (2018). Diversity and multilingual challenges in academic settings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21.7, 825-840, DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2017.1308311.

  • Fostering interculturally responsive educators for a sustainable society Nicolina Bosco, Carlo Orefice, Loretta Fabbri, Mario Giampaolo, in EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY 2/2022 pp.227
    DOI: 10.3280/ess2-2022oa14768

Nicolina Bosco, Loretta Fabbri, Mario Giampaolo, La Student Measure of Culturally Responsive Teaching scale: adattamento e validazione per il contesto universitario italiano in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2022, pp 39-54, DOI: 10.3280/exioa1-2022oa13935