Click here to download

Major retailing vs. specialised shop: a study on Italian beef consumer preferences
Author/s: Leonardo Casini, Nicola Marinelli, Gabriele Scozzafava 
Year:  2013 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  25 Pg. 157-181 FullText PDF:  112 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ECAG2013-001008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The evolution of consumer profiles highlights, for food products and specifically for beef, a growing attention to a number of specific features related to food quality and safety, and environmental and animal welfare issues. Because of this, it is more and more important to understand the consumer’s choice dynamics in order to develop differentiated marketing, commercial and communication strategies which also make use of different distribution channels. This study was conceived with the aim of analysing the different motives and purchase behaviours of beef consumers in the two main distribution channels: Modern Distribution (md) and specialised shops (butcher shops). The research is based on an internet administered questionnaire to a representative sample of 1500 beef consumers. Within the questionnaire a Visual Choice Experiment was proposed and its results were analysed using a Multinomial Logit Model. The results show different consumer characteristics in the two distribution channels which were analyzed, highlighting how the same product attributes have different meanings and relevance. Such results may supply strategic information for packaging, pricing and general commercialisation strategies to be implemented by the different agents in the distribution sector.
Keywords: Beef, consumer behaviour, choice experiment, distribution, marketing Strategies
Jel Code: Q13, C90

  1. Alfnes, F. (2004). Stated Preferences for Imported and Hormone-Treated Beef: Application of a Mixed Logit Model. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(1), 19-37., DOI: 10.1093/erae/31.1.19
  2. Antonelli, G. (Ed.) (2006). Marketing agroalimentare. Specificità e temi di analisi. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  3. Banterle, A., & Stranieri, S. (2008). Information, Labelling and Vertical Coordination: an Analysis of the Italian Meat Supply Networks. Agribusiness, 24(3), 320- 331., DOI: 10.1002/agr.20169
  4. Gao, Z., & Schroeder, T.C. (2009). Effects of Label Information on Consumer Willingness- to-Pay for Food Attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(3), 795-809., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01259.x
  5. Gao, Z., Schroeder, T.C., & Yu, X. (2010). Consumer Willingness to Pay for Cue Attribute: The Value Beyond Its Own. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 22, 108-124., DOI: 10.1080/08974430903372898
  6. Grunert, K.G. (2006). Future Trends and Consumer Lifestyles with Regard to Meat Consumption. Meat Science, 74(1), 149-160., DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.01
  7. Gunderson, M.A., Lusk, J.L., & Norwood, F.B. (2009). Getting Something from Nothing: an Investigation of Beef Demand Expansion and Substitution. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(1), 68-87., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.01426.x
  8. Hess, S., & Rose, J. (2009). Some lessons in stated choice survey design. In European Transport Conference,
  9. Lagerkvist, C.J., Carlsson, F., & Viske, D. (2006). Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare & Biotech: a Choice Experiment. AgBioForum, 9, 51-58.
  10. Loureiro, M.L. & McCluskey, J.J. (2000). Assessing Consumer Response to Protected Geographical Identification Labeling. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 16(3), 309-320.
  11. Loureiro, M.L. & Umberger, W.J. (2003). Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin Labeling. Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 28, 287-301.
  12. Loureiro, M.L., & Umberger, W.J. (2005). Assessing Consumer preferences for Country of Origin Labelling. Journal of Agriculture & Applied Economics, (37), 49-63.
  13. Louviere, J., Hensher, D., & Swait, J. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511753831
  14. Lusk, J.L., & Anderson, J.D. (2004). Effects of Country-of-Origin Labeling on Meat Producers and Consumers. Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 29(2), 185-205.
  15. Schnettler, B., Vidal, R., Silva, R., Vallejos, L., & Sepùlveda, N. (2009). Consumer Willingness to Pay for Beef Meat in a Developing Country: The Effect of Information Regarding Country of Origin, Price and Animal Handling Prior to Slaughter. Food Quality & Preference, 20, 156-165., DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.07.006
  16. Street, D.J., & Burgess, L. (2007). The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods. Wiley-Interscience., DOI: 10.1002/9780470148563
  17. Tonsor, G.T. (2011). Consumer Inferences of Food Safety and Quality. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(2), 213-235., DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbr011
  18. Tonsor, G.T., & Olynk, N. (2011). Impacts of Animal Well-Being and Welfare Media on Meat Demand. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 59-72., DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00266.x
  19. Umberger, W., & Mueller, S. (2010). Is Presentation Everything? Using Visual Presentation of Attributes in Discrete Choice Experiments to Measure the Relative Importance of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Beef Attributes. In Agricultural & Applied Economics Association, Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado.

Leonardo Casini, Nicola Marinelli, Gabriele Scozzafava, Major retailing vs. specialised shop: a study on Italian beef consumer preferences in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 1/2013, pp. 157-181, DOI:10.3280/ECAG2013-001008


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content