Clicca qui per scaricare

La dogmatica giuridica come scienza empirica irriducibile alla sociologia del diritto. Salvare la tesi weberiana della distinzione trascendendola
Titolo Rivista:  SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Autori/Curatori: Edoardo Fittipaldi
Anno di pubblicazione: 2017 Fascicolo: 1 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 22 P. 55-76 Dimensione file: 475 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SD2017-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più, clicca qui e qui





  1. Weber, Max, 1913[1985]. Über einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie. In Johannes Winckelmann (Hrsg.) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  2. —, 1921-21[1976]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (Johannes Winckelmann Hrsg.). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Sie-beck).
  3. Zermelo, Ernst., 1904. Neuer Beweis, dass jede Menge Wohlordnung werden kann (Aus einem an Herrn Hilbert gerichteten Briefe). Mathematische Annalen, 59: 514-16.
  4. Albert, Hans, 1978. Traktat über rationale Praxis. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  5. —, 1987. Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  6. —, 1991. Traktat über kritische Vernunft. 5a edizione. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  7. —, 1994. Pragmatismus und kritischer Rationalismus. Zur Rolle pragmatischer Tendenzen im modernen Denken. In Kurt Salamum (ed.) Kritischer Rationa-lismus und Pragmatismus. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
  8. —, 2000. Kritischer Rationalismus. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  9. Berkeley, George, 1970[1734]. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. 2nd edition. Indianapolis: & New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
  10. Davies, E. Brian, 2004. A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism, --http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1681/1/pluralism16.pdf (visitato l’1 febbraio 2017).
  11. —, 2005a. Whither Mathematics? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 52, 11: 1350-1356.
  12. —, 2005b. A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism. 13 (3): 252-276.
  13. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2003. Scienza del diritto e razionalismo critico. Il programma epistemologico di Hans Albert per scienza e la sociologia del diritto. Milano: Giuffrè.
  14. —, 2015a. Love, Anankasticity, and Human Rights: The Perspective of a Pet-rażyckian Continental Legal Realism. In Piotr Szymaniec (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality and the Protection of the Fundamental rights in the European States. Wałbrzych: Wydawnictwo Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej im. Angelusa Silesiusa w Wałbrzychu.
  15. —, 2015b. Contradictions as Empirical Incompatibilities: Bridging Psychology of Ethical Emotions with Normative Dogmatics. In Stefano Colloca & Paolo Di Lucia (eds.) L’impossibilità normativa. Milan: LED.
  16. —, 2016a. Jerzy Lande. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philos-ophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  17. —, 2016b. Introduction: Continental Legal Realism. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  18. Hart, Herbert L.A., 1957[1983]. Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence. In Her-bert L.A. Hart, Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  19. Kelsen, Hans, 1941. The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review, 55, 1: 44-70.
  20. Lakatos, Imre, 1962[1978]. Infinite Regress and Foundations of Mathematics. In Imre Lakatos (John Worrall & Gregory Currie eds.) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Lakatos, Imre, 1978. What Does a Mathematical Proof Prove? In Imre Lakatos (John Worrall & Gregory Currie eds.) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Leiter, Brian, 2007. Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Olivecrona, Karl, 1948. Is a Sociological Explanation of Law Possible? Theoria, 14: 167-207.
  24. —, 1971. Law as Fact. 2a edizione. London: Stevens & Sons.
  25. Palombella G., 2001. Arguments in Favour of a Functional Theory of Fundamental Rights. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 14, 3: 299-326.
  26. —, 2007. From Human Rights to Fundamental Rights. Consequences of a concep-tual distinction. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 93, 3: 396-42.
  27. Pattaro, Enrico, 2005. The Law and the Right. A Reappraisal of the Reality that Ought to Be. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  28. —, 2016. Axel Hägerström at the Origins of the Uppsala School. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer
  29. Priest, Graham, 1987. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Dordrecht etc.: Martinus Nijhoff.
  30. Rosser, John Barkley, 1953. Logic for Mathematicians. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
  31. Sacco, Rodolfo, 1991. Legal Formants. A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39, 1: 1-34 & 39, 2: 343-401.
  32. Taylor, John R., 2003. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edoardo Fittipaldi, La dogmatica giuridica come scienza empirica irriducibile alla sociologia del diritto. Salvare la tesi weberiana della distinzione trascendendola in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2017, pp. 55-76, DOI:10.3280/SD2017-001004

     


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche
Acquista qui

Informazioni sulla rivista

Sottoscrivi il FEED
per conoscere subito
i contenuti dell'ultimo fascicolo di questa Rivista

English Version

Download credit

Pubblicità