Click here to download

Translating means-end research into advertising strategy using the meccas model
Journal Title: ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE 
Author/s: Daniel Eberhard 
Year:  2017 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  24 Pg. 333-356 FullText PDF:  292 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ECAG2017-003003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This paper illustrates the translation of actual research data of a meansend analysis into concrete advertising strategies using the so called "means-end conceptualization of the components of advertising strategy" - commonly referred to as "meccas" model. In this case, an underlying study examined buying motives of male German recreational athletes with regards to anabolic supplements using the means-end approach. By applying the meccas model, i.e. translating the different layers of the cumulated means-end chains of this study into elements of advertising, six print-advertising strategies were developed in cooperation with a professional graphic studio. Practical applications of the meccas model with regards to its original intent of developing advertising strategies have been conducted very rarely in a scientific context. This case study will pose an illustrative example for researchers and marketers alike and also lay basis for further scrutiny of means-end theory in general.
Keywords: Means-end chains, meccas, laddering, advertising
Jel Code: M31, M37

  1. Atkinson, M. (2007). Playing With Fire: Masculinity, Health and Sports Supplements. Sociology of Sport Journal, 24(2), 165-186.
  2. Audenaert, A. & Steenkamp, J.M. (1997). Means-end chain theory and laddering in agricultural marketing research. Proceedings of the 49th European Association of Agricultural Economists (eaae) Seminar, 19-21 February 1997, Bonn, Germany, 217-230., 10.1007/978-1-4615-6273-3_11DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6273-3_11
  3. Belch, G.E. & Belch, M.A. (2001). Advertising and Promotion: An integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. Boston, Massachusetts: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Blythe, J. (2008). Consumer Behaviour. Los Angeles, California: Sage.
  5. DeLorme, D.E., Huh, J., Reid, L.N. & An, S. (2012). Dietary supplement advertising in the US: A review. International Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 547-577.
  6. Eberhard, D. & Fantapié Altobelli, C. (2014). Buying Motives for Anabolic Supplements – An Analysis among German Recreational Athletes. Sport and Art, 2(5), 75-84.
  7. Esch, F.-R. (2004). Strategie und Technik der Markenführung. Munich, Germany: Vahlen., 10.15358/9783800648573DOI: 10.15358/9783800648573
  8. Gengler, C.E. & Reynolds, T.J. (1995). Consumer Understanding and Advertising Strategy: Analysis and Strategic Translation of Laddering Data. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(4), 19-33.
  9. Ghura, D. & Schrimper, R.A. (1992). Newspaper Advertising of Apples in North Carolina: Characteristics and Comparisons across Cities and Time. 1989 Commodity Advertising and Promotion Conference Paper, February 1989, Ames, Iowa, 3-23.
  10. Gutman, J. & Reynolds, T.J. (1979). An Investigation of the Levels of Cognitive Abstraction utilized by Consumers in Product Differentiation. In: Eighney, J. (Ed.), Attitude Research under the Sun. Chicago, Illinois: American Marketing Association.
  11. Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72., 10.2307/3203341DOI: 10.2307/3203341
  12. Gutman, J. (1991). Exploring the Nature of Linkages between Consequences and Values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 143-148., 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90048-3DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90048-3
  13. Grunert, K.G., Beckmann, S.C. & Sørensen, E. (1995). Means-End Chains and Laddering: An Inventory of Problems and an Agenda for Research. Center for Market Surveillance Working Paper, no. 34, November. Aarhus, Denmark: The Aarhus School of Business.
  14. Jaeger, S.R., & MacFie, H.J.H. (2001). Incorporating “Health” into Promotional Messages for Apples: A Means-End Theory Approach. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 6(4), 27-52.
  15. Kelly, G.A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. London, United Kingdom: Routledge., 10.4324/9780203405970DOI: 10.4324/9780203405970
  16. Kloss, I. (2007), Werbung. Munich, Germany: Vahlen., 10.1515/9783486812428DOI: 10.1515/9783486812428
  17. Kroeber-Riel, W. & Esch, F.-R. (1993). Strategie und Technik der Werbung. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
  18. Meffert, H. (2008). Marketing. Berlin, Germany: Springer., 10.1007/987-3-8349-9584-1DOI: 10.1007/987-3-8349-9584-1
  19. Mottram, D.R. (1988). Supplement use in Sport. In: Mottram, D.R. (Ed.), Drugs in Sport. London, United Kingdom: Routledge., 10.4324/9780203471890DOI: 10.4324/9780203471890
  20. Olson, J.C. & Reynolds, T.J. (1983). Understanding Consumers’ Cognitive Structures: Implications for Advertising Strategy. In: Percy, L. & Woodside, A. (Eds.), Advertising and Consumer Psychology. Lanham, New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield.
  21. Olson, J.C. & Reynolds, T.J. (2001). The Means-End Approach to Understanding Customer Decision Making. In: Reynolds, T.J. & Olson, J.C. (Eds.), Understanding Customer Decision Making. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Reynolds, T.J. & Craddock, A.B. (1988). The Application of the meccas model to the development and assessment of advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(2), 43-54.
  23. Reynolds, T.J. & Gutman, J. (1984). Advertising is Image Management. Journal of Advertising Research, 2(1), 27-37.
  24. Reynolds, T.J. & Gutman, J. (1988). Laddering theory, method, analysis & interpretation. Journal of Advertising Research, 28(1), 11-31.
  25. Reynolds, T.J. & Rochon, J.P. (1991). Means-End Based Advertising Research: Copy Testing Is Not Strategy Assessment. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 131-142., 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90047-2DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90047-2
  26. Reynolds, T.J., Dethloff, C. & Westberg, S.J. (2001a). Advancements in Laddering. In: Reynolds, T.J. & Olson, J.C. (Eds.), Understanding Customer Decision Making. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  27. Reynolds, T.J., Withlark, D.B. & Wirthlin, R.B. (2001b). Effectively translating indepth Consumer Understanding into Communications Strategy and Advertising Practice. In: Reynolds, T.J. & Olson, J.C. (Eds.). Understanding Customer Decision Making. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  28. Reynolds, T.J., Olson, J.C. & Rochon, J.P. (2009). A Strategic Approach to Measuring Advertising Effectiveness. In: Wells, W.D. (Ed.), Measuring advertising effectiveness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., 10.4324/9781315806099DOI: 10.4324/9781315806099
  29. Rossiter, J.R. & Percy, L. (1999). The A-b-e Model of Benefit Focus in Advertising. Australian Graduate School of Management Working Paper Series, 99(2), 1-49.
  30. Sampson, P. (1972). Using the Repertory grid test. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(1), 78-81., 10.2307/3149614DOI: 10.2307/3149614
  31. Schiffmann, L.G. & Kanuk, L.L. (2009). Consumer Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
  32. Schreiber, G. & Schrattenecker, G. (1995). Werbung. Stuttgart, Germany: UTB.
  33. Soh, H., Reid, L.N. & King, K.W. (2007). Trust In Different Advertising Media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(3), 455-476., 10.1177/107769900708400304DOI: 10.1177/107769900708400304
  34. Weinberger, M.G. & Gulas, C.S. (1992). The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising, 21(4), 35-39., 10.1080/00913367.1992.10673384DOI: 10.1080/00913367.1992.10673384

Daniel Eberhard, in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 3/2017, pp. 333-356, DOI:10.3280/ECAG2017-003003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content