Considerations on Giuseppe Civitarese’s paper "On the concept of intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis"
Journal title PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE
Author/s Filippo Maria Ferro, Giuseppe Riefolo
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2023/3
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 399-412 File size 71 KB
DOI 10.3280/PU2023-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
In dialogue with the paper by Civitarese (2023), some reflections are suggested. Inter- subjectivity shifts the focus of psychoanalytic interest from the subject to the “intersubject”. Psy- choanalytic interest, therefore, moves from a study of phenomena toward a continuously unstable and fluid process. Such a process identifies fields and no more tòpoi in which it can organize itself. Our reflection seeks to emphasize the suggestions of Civitarese and, above all, is oriented toward underlining the three levels of intersubjectivity as proposed by Infant Research, prelimi- nary to the more radical positions of Stolorow’s group, and then of Jessica Benjamin and of Ogden. Intersubjectivity necessarily identifies a third type of unconscious, which is not only dy- namic and pre-reflexive, but above all not validated. Finally, enactments, by disengaging action from acting-out, assume a function of creative evolution in the therapeutic process.
Keywords: Intersubjectivity; Unconscious; Psychoanalytic field; Enactment; Analytic neutrality
- Intersoggettività: questa sconosciuta. Controreplica a Civitarese Mauro Fornaro, in PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 3/2023 pp.443
DOI: 10.3280/PU2023-003006 - Il valore dell'intertestualità per il progresso della psicoanalisi. Replica ai commenti di F.M. Ferro & G. Riefolo e di M. Fornaro al saggio "Sul concetto di intersoggettività in psicoanalisi" Giuseppe Civitarese, in PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 3/2023 pp.423
DOI: 10.3280/PU2023-003005 - Essere o non essere Habermas. Una risposta alla controreplica di Mauro Fornaro Giuseppe Civitarese, in PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 3/2023 pp.449
DOI: 10.3280/PU2023-003007
Filippo Maria Ferro, Giuseppe Riefolo, Considerazioni sull’articolo di Giuseppe Civitarese "Sul concetto di intersoggettività in psicoanalisi" in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2023, pp 399-412, DOI: 10.3280/PU2023-003003