Defining Urban Design. Some historiographical remarks
Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Patrizia Bonifazio, Federico Deambrosis
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2018/87
Language Italian Pages 8 P. 19-26 File size 1151 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2018-087003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The term, ‘urban design’, has been used over the last decades with increasing frequency by a more and more extended and varied pool of actors, widening the range of its meanings. Such an expansion today makes the definition of the term not obvious at all. Even in the historiographical field, some recent works adopted highly inclusive perspectives that blurred the thresholds between urban design and other design practices. Proceeding from these observations, the following lines schematically retrace the Italian and international developments in order to reflect on some issues that are considered nodal for the definition of the ‘territory’ of urban design.
Keywords: Bibliography; cronologies; biographies
Patrizia Bonifazio, Federico Deambrosis, Defining Urban Design, alcune riflessioni storiografiche in "TERRITORIO" 87/2018, pp 19-26, DOI: 10.3280/TR2018-087003