Workplace safety and regulation: from policy to situated game rules

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Silvia Doria
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/135 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 167-181 File size 113 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2014-135010
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper proposes a reflection on the theme of safety in the workplace and its regulation through ethnographic observation of some urban sites. This contribution is part of a wider research. Following a Practice-based Studies perspective (Gherardi, 2000), the research focused on the practices of safety under construction, both as construction industry and as the process by which the daily safety is put into practice and re-built in the relationships and interactions involving different actors. These actors, in fact, are characterized by a specific professional vision (Goodwin, 1994) of what is or is not safe in the local context in which they work. Starting from these considerations, the author aims to show that in the case of workplace safety regulation "failure/betrayal" spaces - in the relationship between different institutional actors at different levels of regulation (ILO, European Union, Italian Governments for example) - coexist with spaces of alternative, creative and collective creation of situated game rules (in a specific workplace) that allow to work safely.

Keywords: Workplace safety, regulation, construction site, situated game rules, situated practices, ethnography

  1. Atkinson P., Coffey A., Delamont S., Lofland J. and Lofland L., eds. (2001). Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  2. Blackler F., Crump N., McDonald S. (2003). Organizing process in complex activity networks. In: Nicolini D., Gherardi S., Yanow D., eds., Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-based Approach. New York: M.E Sharpe, pp. 126-150.
  3. Callon M. (1980). Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not: the sociology of translation. In: Knorr-Cetina K., Krohn R., Whitley R., eds., The social Process of Scientific Investigation. Boston: Reidel, pp.: 197-219.
  4. Callon M. (1986). The sociology of an Actor-Network. In: Callon M., Law J., Rip A., eds., Mapping the Dynamic of Science and Technology. London: McMillan.
  5. Collinson D. (1992). Managing the Shopfloor: Subjectivity, Masculinity and Workplace Culture. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  6. Conein B., Jacopin E. (1994). Action située et cognition: le savoir en place. Sociologie du travail, XXXVI, 4: 475-500.
  7. Czarniawska B. (2007). Shadowing, and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
  8. Czarniawska B., Hernes T., eds. (2005). Actor-Network Theory and Organizing. Sweden: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
  9. Czarniawska B., Joerges B. (1995). Venti di cambiamento organizzativo: come le idee si traducono in oggetti e azioni. In: Bacharach S.B., Gagliardi P., Mundell B., a cura di, Il pensiero organizzativo europeo. Milano: Guerini e Associati, pp. 213-255.
  10. Doria S. (2011). Che genere di etnografia! Il cantiere non è un posto per donne. In: K. Krippendorff, G. La Rocca, a cura di, Ricerca qualitativa e giovani studiosi. Atti del Convegno Internazionale RiQGioS-2011. Palermo: Social
  11. Books. Doria S. (2013a). Cantieri e sicurezza: diario di una giornata. In: La Rosa M., Pallareti U., a cura di, Lavoro e ricerca sociologica. Un confronto fra giovani ricercatori italiani. Sociologia del lavoro, Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 79-92.
  12. Doria S. (2013b). La sicurezza in cantiere: negoziare per costruire. Studi organizzativi, 1: 32-55. DOI: 10.3280/SO2013-001002
  13. Gherardi S. (2000). Practice-based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations. Organization, 7/2: 211-223. DOI: 10.1177/135050840072001
  14. Gherardi S. (2006). Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
  15. Garfinkel H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  16. Gherardi S., Lippi A. (2000). Tradurre le riforme in pratica. Le strategie della traslazione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  17. Gherardi S., Nicolini D., Odella F. (1997a). Dal rischio alla sicurezza: il contributo sociologico alla costruzione di organizzazioni affidabili. Quaderni di sociologia, 13: 79-108.
  18. Gherardi S., Nicolini D., Odella F. (1997b). La cultura della sicurezza sui luoghi di lavoro. Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 162: 15-30.
  19. Giuliani M. (1989). Regolazione senza regole. Il caso italiano e le possibili interpretazioni. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 36/4:
  20. 3-43.
  21. Giuliani M. (1998). Politica regolativa. In: Capano G., Giuliani M., a cura di, Dizionario delle politiche pubbliche. Roma: Carocci, pp. 329-336.
  22. Goffman E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Garden City.
  23. Goodwin C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 3: 606-633 (trad. it. Visioni professionali. In: Goodwin C., Il senso del vedere. Roma: Meltemi, 2003).
  24. Grassani E. (2006). Cultura e sicurezza sul lavoro. Qualità dei processi formativi e valutazione dell’apprendimento. Milano: Editoriale Delfino.
  25. Kazepov Y., Carbone D. (2007). Che cos’è il welfare state. Roma: Carocci.
  26. La Spina A. (1998). Strumenti regolativi. In: Capano G., Giuliani M., a cura di, Dizionario delle politiche pubbliche. Roma: Carocci, pp.386-392.
  27. Latour B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (trad. it. La scienza in azione. Torino: Edizioni di Comunità, 1992).
  28. Law J. (1994). Organizing Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
  29. Mongili A. (2007). Tecnologia e società. Roma: Carocci.
  30. Nicolini D. (2001). Il tessuto interorganizzativo della sicurezza: una visione prossimale, Studi organizzativi, 2-3: 93-117.
  31. Polanyi M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (trad. it. La conoscenza personale. Verso una filosofia post-critica. Milano: Rusconi, 1990).
  32. Reynaud J.-D. (1988). Les régulations dans les organisations: régulation de contrôle et régulation autonome. Revue française de sociologie, 29-1: 5-18.
  33. Savona E.U., Di Nicola A., Vettori B., a cura di (2008). Gli infortuni sul lavoro. Dall’analisi delle cause alla loro prevenzione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  34. Sclavi M. (1989). Ad una spanna da terra. Milano: Feltrinelli. Star S.L., Griesemer J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and coherence:
  35. amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science, 19: 387-420.
  36. Suchman L. (1987). Plans and Situated Action: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Suchman L. (2000). Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-building. Organization, 7/2: 311-327.
  38. Strati A. (2000). Estetica, conoscenza tacita e apprendimento organizzativo. Studi organizzativi, 2: 157-177.

Silvia Doria, Sicurezza sul lavoro e regolazione: dalle policy alle regole del gioco situate in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 135/2014, pp 167-181, DOI: 10.3280/SL2014-135010