Deliberation and Conflict: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis
Journal title PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO
Author/s Gianfranco Pomatto, Stefania Ravazzi
Publishing Year 2012 Issue 2012/2
Language Italian Pages 27 P. 79-105 File size 414 KB
DOI 10.3280/PACO2012-002004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The article aims at analyzing the impact of deliberation on the dynamics of the conflicts in the policy making processes. We shall argue whether and how deliberation succeeds in stopping the typical escalation of the conflicts, lowering protests, generating more open-minded institutional decisions, reducing stereotypes and developing a new constructive approach in decision making. The analysis is based on the comparison of three recent cases of deliberative processes dealing with conflictual issues: a deliberative process on the hypothesis to write a bill regulating the use and power of the living will; a public debate on a new highway stretch in the city of Genova; a citizens’ jury on the building of a small plant to dispose of industrial waste in the small tuscan town of Castelfranco.
Keywords: Deliberation, conflict management, citizens jury, debat publique
- Interprétations agonistiques, dialogiques et élitistes : participation et conflit dans trois cas en Italie Gianfranco Pomatto, in Participations /2016 pp.35
DOI: 10.3917/parti.013.0035
Gianfranco Pomatto, Stefania Ravazzi, Deliberazione e conflitto: evidenze da un’analisi comparata in "PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO" 2/2012, pp 79-105, DOI: 10.3280/PACO2012-002004