Cinema and human sciences. Intersubjectivity and the emerging level in the close horizon of postmodernism

Journal title PSICOBIETTIVO
Author/s Caterina Selavggi
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2013/3 Language Italian
Pages 12 P. 167-178 File size 125 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSOB2013-003011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Author focuses on the importance of the intersubjective elements in the cinema Director’s capacity in creating film situations in which behaviors themselves express intersubjective implications. Cinema Directors such as Gianni Amelio and Matteo Garrone are example of what Daniel Stern called "Now moments", phenomena of shared consciousness and experience, in which not only the words, but the global bodily perception becomes a way for intersubjectivity. This encourages the "emerging level", considered as the experience of arising novelties, which is crucial in all the current researches about mind functioning, including the neuroscientific ones (see the "mirror neurons" discovered by Rizzolatti and Gallese). All these considerations give value to the epistemology of complexity with particular reference to Gregory Bateson’s work. Even postmodern cinema directors (Tarantino) are great exemples of Prigogine’s systemic instability.

Keywords: Cinema; Intersubjectivity; Relations; Complexity; Non-Verbal Communication; Mirror-Neurons.

  1. Bateson G. (1972) Verso un’ecologia della mente, Adelphi, Milano
  2. Bauman Z. (2011) Il buio del postmoderno, Aliberti, Roma
  3. Bocchi G., Ceruti M. (1995) La sfida della complessità, Feltrinelli, Milano
  4. Eco U. (1995) Interpretazione e sovrainterpretazione. Un dibattito con J. Culler, C. Booke-Rosee R. Rorty, a cura di S. Collini, Bompiani, Milano
  5. Ferraris M. (2010) Ricostruire la decostruzione, Bompiani, Milano
  6. Freud S. (1987) (1915) Pulsioni e loro destini, in OSF, vol. VIII, Bollati
  7. Boringhieri, Torino
  8. Gallese V., Migone P., Eagle M. (2006) “La simulazione incarnata: i neuroni specchio. Le basi neurofisiologiche dell’intersoggettività e alcune implicazioni per la psicoanalisi”, Psicoterapia e scienze umane, 40, 3: 543-580
  9. Husserl E. (1988) Meditazioni cartesiane, Bompiani, Milano
  10. Jameson F. (2007) Postmodernismo, Fazi, Roma
  11. Jullier L. (2006) Il cinema postmoderno, Kaplan, Torino
  12. Kant I. (1969) (1780) Critica della ragion pura, vol. I, Laterza, Roma-Bari
  13. Lacan J. (2004) Dizionario di psicoanalisi, a cura di R. Chemana, B. Vandermersch
  14. Lyotard J.F. (1981) La condizione postmoderna, Feltrinelli, Milano
  15. Prigogine I., Stengers I. (1981) La nuova alleanza, Einaudi, Torino
  16. Searle J.R. (1978) “Per una tassonomia degli atti illocutori”, in Sbisà M. (a cura di), Gli atti linguistici, Feltrinelli, Milano
  17. Selvaggi C. (2012) La relazione postmoderna, FrancoAngeli, Milano
  18. Stern D. (1987) Il mondo interpersonale del bambino, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino
  19. Stern D. (2005) Il momento presente, Raffaello Cortina, Milano
  20. Watzlawick P., Weakland J. (1978), La prospettiva relazionale, Roma, Astrolabio
  21. Zagarrio V. (2010) Gli invisibili, Kaplan, Torino

Caterina Selavggi, Cinema e scienze umane. L’intersoggettività: il livello emergente nell’orizzonte chiuso postmoderno in "PSICOBIETTIVO" 3/2013, pp 167-178, DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2013-003011