"Total institution", Prison and Health. The Inmate as a "Social Disabled"

Journal title RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE
Author/s Ranieri de Maria
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2015/4 Language Italian
Pages 37 P. 5-41 File size 185 KB
DOI 10.3280/SA2015-004001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In contemporary legal systems, imprisonment is considered the principal form of punishment, if not the exclusive one. However, the way it is practiced in Italy, detention is unsuccessful in rehabilitating inmates. Instead, it is a willful expression of punishing an antisocial behavior with suffering, and this probably explains the lack of attention to health of inmates and prison overcrowding. By failing to rehabilitate, imprisonment cannot legitimize itself as a tool for correction, revealing what it is in actuality: a form of social exclusion carried out by total institutions. This implies that imprisonment weakens the physical and mental integrity of the prisoner, who then comes to be considered "socially disabled", that is, a person whose normal operating capacity has been impaired by structural factors, and not by physical disabilities; and whose health can't be treated by the conventional on-demand health system tools, but instead according to a model of healthcare initiative, which however does not seem likely to be implemented soon.

Keywords: Punishment, inmates, prison, health, social exclusion, social disability

  1. Aebi M.F., Delgrande N. (2013). SPACE I – Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2011. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
  2. Associazione Antigone (2015a). XI Rapporto nazionale sulle condizioni di detenzione. Oltre i tre metri quadri. Torino: Edizioni Gruppo Abele.
  3. Associazione Antigone (2015b). Rapporto Online sulle condizioni di detenzione nelle carceri italiane. Disponibile all’indirizzo web: http://www.associazioneantigone.it/osservatorio/ rapportoonline/rapportoon.htm (28/11/2015).
  4. Armstrong S., McNeill F. (2012). Reducing Reoffending: Review of Selected Countries. The Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research, SCCJR Research Report No: 04/2012, disponibile all’indirizzo web http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ Reducing-Reoffending-FINAL-Dec-2012.pdf (28/11/2015).
  5. Aureli F., Cozzolino R., Cordischi C., Scucchi S. (1992). Kin-oriented redirection among Japanese macaques: an expression of a revenge system? Animal Behaviour, 44: 283. DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(92)90034-7DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb14047.x
  6. Bahnson C.B. (1969). Psychophysiological complementarity in malignancies: Past work and future vistase. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 164: 319.
  7. Bayer C.P., Klasen F., Adam H. (2007). Association of trauma and PTSD symptoms with openness to reconciliation and feelings of revenge among former Ugandan and Congolese child soldiers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 5: 555. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.5.555
  8. Bettiol G. (1986). Diritto penale, 12a ed. Padova: CEDAM.
  9. Bongiorno A., Trapani G. (2004). Desensibilizzazione attraverso l’esposizione all’immagine corporea digitalizzata (DEICD). Assessment e trattamento del disturbo da dismorfismo corporeo nell’anoressia nervosa. Atti del IX Corso Nazionale di Aggiornamento su “I disturbi dell’Alimentazione in età evolutiva. Anoressia, Bulimia, Obesità”.
  10. Bongiorno A., Trapani G. et al. (2006). Tirannia e schiavitù del corpo: paradossi del pensiero anoressico, Italian Journal of Psychopathology, 12, 1, suppl., 198.
  11. Bruhn A. (2013). Gender Relations and Division of Labour among Prison Officers in Swedish Male Prisons. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 14: 2, 115. DOI: 10.1080/14043858.2013.845353
  12. Buracchi T. (2004). Origini ed evoluzione del carcere moderno. Tesi di laurea, disponibile all’indirizzo web http://www.altrodiritto.unifi.it/ricerche/asylum/buracchi/ (28/11/2015).
  13. Clutton-Brock T.H., Parker G.A. (1995). Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 373, 6511: 209. DOI: 10.1038/373209a0
  14. Commissione europea (2011). Rafforzare la fiducia reciproca nello spazio giudiziario europeo – Libro verde sull’applicazione della normativa dell’UE sulla giustizia penale nel settore della detenzione. Bruxelles. Testo disponibile all’indirizzo web http://eur-lex.europa. eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0327:FIN:IT:PDF (29/11/2015).
  15. Compare A., Germani E., Grossi E., Iommelli P., Del Forno D. (2012). I processi cognitivo-emotivi coinvolti nei disturbi da somatizzazione. In Compare A., Grossi E., a cura di, Stress e disturbi da somatizzazione. Milano: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2080-1
  16. Consiglio d’Europa (2006). Raccomandazione R (2006)2 del Comitato dei Ministri agli Stati membri sulle Regole penitenziarie europee. Disponibile all’indirizzo web: http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/STANDARDSETTING/PRISONS/EPR/Regole%20Penitenziarie%20Europee%20ITALIANO.pdf (28/11/2015).
  17. Cruickshank R. (1953). Epidemiology of some skin infections. British Medical Journal, 1, 4801: 55. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.4801.55
  18. Curcio R., Petrelli S., Valentino N. (1990). Nel bosco di Bistorco. Roma: Sensibili alle foglie.
  19. Curcio R. (1997). La soglia. Milano: Tropea.
  20. Del Forno D., Compare A., Grossi E., Scuotto A., Battimiello V., Caiazza A. (2012). Le patologie legate allo stress: Un’introduzione generale. In Compare A., Grossi E., a cura di, Stress e disturbi da somatizzazione. Milano: Springer-Verlag, p. 85. DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2080-1_6
  21. de Maria R. (2007). Rischio clinico, criticità nella cura della salute e negoziazione relazionale. In: de Maria R. (a cura di), Rischio clinico e negoziazione della salute. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  22. de Maria R. (2012). Corpo e individuo nel Welfare State: pubblici poteri e dignità umana. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 2: 63. DOI: 10.3280/SA2012-002004
  23. de Maria (2013). Sostenibilità e riforma del Sistema Sanitario Nazionale, tra modelli etici e scarsità di risorse. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 4: 5. DOI: 10.3280/SA2013-004001
  24. ECDC (2015). Sexually transmitted infections in Europe 2013. Stockolm: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Disponibile all’indirizzo web: http://ecdc.europa.eu/ en/publications/Publications/sexual-transmitted-infections-europe-surveillance-report-2013.pdf (29/11/2015).
  25. Federal Bureau of Prisons (2013). Preventive Health Care, Clinical Practice Guidelines. Disponibile all’indirizzo web: http://www.bop. gov/news/PDFs/phc.pdf (29/11/2015).
  26. Foucault M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it.: Sorvegliare e punire. Torino: Einaudi, 1976).
  27. Foucault M. (1998). Archivio Foucault 3. Interventi, colloqui, interviste. 1978-1985. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  28. Foucault M. (2005). Antologia. L’impazienza della libertà. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  29. Galimberti U. (1983). Il corpo. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  30. Gallo E., Ruggiero V. (1989). Il carcere immateriale. La detenzione come fabbrica di handicap. Torino: Sonda.
  31. Goffman E. (1968). ASYLUMS. Le istituzioni totali: i meccanismi dell’esclusione e della violenza. Torino: Enaudi.
  32. Gonin, D. (1991). La santé incarcérée: Médecine et conditions de vie en détention. Paris: l'Archipel (trad. it. Il corpo incarcerato. Torino: Gruppo Abele, 1994).
  33. Silk J.B. (1992). The patterning of intervention among male bonnet macaques: reciprocity, revenge, and loyalty. Current Anthropology, 33, 3: 318. DOI: 10.1086/204073
  34. Guagliardo V. (1997). Dei dolori e delle pene. Roma: Sensibili alle foglie. Disponibile all’indirizzo web http://www.ristretti.it/areestudio/cultura/libri/dei_dolori_delle_pene.pdf (27/11/2015).
  35. Hoover J.P., Robinson S.K. (2007). Retaliatory mafia behavior by a parasitic cowbird favors host acceptance of parasitic eggs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 11: 4479. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609710104
  36. Horney K. (1949). The value of vindictiveness. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 8: 312. DOI: 10.1007/BF01871591
  37. Istituto Superiore di Sanità (2014). Notiziario. 26, 9, suppl. 1.
  38. Jacoby S. (1983). Wild justice: The evolution of revenge. New York: Harper and Row.
  39. Jensen K., Call J., Tomasello M. (2007). Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 32: 13046. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705555104
  40. Kristoffersen R., ed. (2010). Correctional Statistics of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, 2004-2008. Oslo: Correctional Service of Norway Staff Academy.
  41. Kroenke K., Mangelsdorff A.D. (1989). Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. The American Journal of Medicine, 86, 3: 262. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90293-3
  42. Lazarus R.S. (1993). Coping theory and research: past, present and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55(3): 234-47.
  43. Liszt F. Von (1962). La teoria dello scopo nel diritto penale. Milano: Giuffrè.
  44. McAlexander L.N., McAlexander J.H. (2011). Prison – The Key to Stay Free. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.
  45. McCullough M.E., Kurzban R., Tabak B.A. (2013). Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 01: 1. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X11002160
  46. Ministero della Giustizia (2011). Intervento della guardasigilli Paola Severino alla conferenza stampa su carcere e recidiva. Giustizia Newsonline, https://goo.gl/YU28gB (28/11/2015).
  47. Ministero della Giustizia (2015). Statistiche dell’amministrazione della giustizia. https://www. giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_14.wp (29/11/2015).
  48. Murphy J.G. (2003). Getting even: Forgiveness and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Musher D.M. (2003). How Contagious Are Common Respiratory Tract Infections? New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 13: 1256. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra021771
  50. Orth U., Berking M., Walker N., Meier L.L., Znoj H. (2008). Forgiveness and psychological adjustment following interpersonal transgressions: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 2: 365. DOI: 10.1016/J.Jrp.2007.07.003
  51. Orwell G. (1983). 1984. Milano: Mondandori.
  52. Pancheri P. (1980). Stress, emozioni malattia: introduzione alla medicina psicosomatica. Milano: Mondandori.
  53. Parkes C.M. (1993). Psychiatric problems following bereavement by murder or manslaughter. Bereavement Care, 12, 1: 2. DOI: 10.1080/02682629308657301
  54. Ryan R.M., Huta V., Deci E.L. (2008). Living well: A Self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9: 139. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
  55. Sartre J.P. (1943). L’être et le néant: essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard.
  56. Schumann K., Ross M. (2010). The benefits, costs, and paradox of revenge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 12: 1193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00322.x
  57. Selye H. (1936). A Syndrome produced by Diverse Nocuous Agents. Nature, 138: 32-32. DOI: 10.1038/138032a0
  58. Skardhamar T., Telle K. (2012). Post-release employment and recidivism in Norway. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 4: 629. DOI 10.1007/s10940-012-9166-x.
  59. Sommer R. (1959). Patients Who Grow Old in a Mental Hospital. Geriatrics, XIV: 586.
  60. Stuckless N., Ford B.D., Vitelli R. (1995). Vengeance, anger and irrational beliefs in inmates: A caveat regarding social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 1: 1-6, DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)00134-E
  61. Summerfield D. (2002). Effects of war: moral knowledge, revenge, reconciliation, and medicalised concepts of “recovery”. British Medical Journal, 325, 7372: 1105. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1105
  62. Terrill R.J. (2009). Chapter III – Sweden. In World Criminal Justice Systems (Seventh Edition), ed. Terrill R.J., Boston: Anderson Publishing. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-59345-612-2.50007-3
  63. Tessitore G. (2002). L’utopia penitenziale borbonica. Dalle pene corporali a quelle detentive. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  64. Timio M., Verdecchia P., Venanzi S., Gentili S., Ronconi M., Francucci B., Bichisao E. (1988). Age and blood pressure changes. A 20-year follow-up study in nuns in a secluded order. Hypertension, 12, 4: 457. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.12.4.457
  65. Wells W.F., Wells M.W., Mudd S. (1939). Infection of Air: Bacteriologic and Epidemiologic Factors. American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 29, 8: 863. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.29.8.863
  66. World Prison Brief, an online database comprising information on prisons and the use of imprisonment around the world. Disponibile all’indirizzo web: http://www.prisonstudies. org/ (28/11/2015).

Ranieri de Maria, "Istituzione totale" carcere e salute. Il detenuto come "disabile sociale" in "RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE" 4/2015, pp 5-41, DOI: 10.3280/SA2015-004001