Psychology profession, clinical psychology, psychotherapy. Specificities and boundaries

Journal title RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
Author/s Gianluca Castelnuovo, Santo Di Nuovo, Vittorio Lingiardi, Fabio Madeddu, Sergio Salvatore
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2023/1 Language English
Pages 19 P. 7-25 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rpc1-2023oa16357
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In the Italian context, the psychology profession is regulated by a particular legal framework, which establishes that (a) a set of expert functions (e.g., psychological diagnosis, rehabilitation) are exclusively reserved to the psychology profession (b) psychotherapy is defined a second-order function reserved to psychologists (and practitioners) having a 4-year specialization after the master degree in psychology. This specific institutional framework raises the necessity of a threefold differentiation. First, the need to set clear scientific boundaries between professional psychology and other non-psychological forms of professional/expert practice (e.g., counselor, mental coach). Second, the need to clarify the specificity of the psychology practices operating in the clinical field with respect to those operating in other fields of intervention (e.g., school, community). Third, the need to model the articulation between the clinical psychologist and the psychotherapist. The paper provides a model to operate such a differentiation. Though motivated by and focused on the peculiarity of the Italian context, the current paper offers considerations that may transcend that context and be of general interest

Keywords: ; Psychology profession; Clinical psychology ; Psychotherapy

  1. American Psychological Association (2013). Riconoscimento dell’efficacia della psicoterapia. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 47(3), 407-422.
  2. Barkham, M., Lutz, W., & Castonguay, L.G. (Eds.) (2021). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 7th edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Llewelyn, S., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2017). Clinical Psychology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Norcross, J.C., & Lambert, M.J. (Eds.) (2019). Psychotherapy Relationships that Work, vol. 1: Evidence-Based Therapist Contributions, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Wampold, B.E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. models, methods, and findings. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Westen, D., Morrison, K., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2005). Lo statuto empirico delle psicoterapie validate empiricamente: Assunti, risultati e pubblicazione delle ricerche. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 39(1), 7-90.

  • Trajectories of support intervention in clinical psychology Maria Francesca Freda, Ersilia Auriemma, Cristiano Scandurra, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 2/2024 pp.95
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc2-2023oa16675
  • Models of practice and training in psychotherapy: cross-national perspectives from Italy and Canada Victoria Klimkowski, Sofia McRae, Alexia Blick, Laurence Beaulieu, J. Reese S. Handley, Anara A. Hopley, Caroline A. Hyde, Devika M. Jain, Sylvia Kolodziejczyk, Josiane Laliberté, Alexa Lévesque, Lara M. Masri, Anya M. Monet, Reagan S. Nediu, Rachel Valihrach, Giorgio Tasca, in Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome /2024
    DOI: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.732

Gianluca Castelnuovo, Santo Di Nuovo, Vittorio Lingiardi, Fabio Madeddu, Sergio Salvatore, Psychology profession, clinical psychology, psychotherapy. Specificities and boundaries in "RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA" 1/2023, pp 7-25, DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2023oa16357